it is strange to apprehend how he came to imagine that I said he did it not as our mediator, but as a private man. That which, possibly, might cast his thoughts into this disorder was, that he knew not that Christ was made a private man as mediator ; which yet the Scripture is sufficiently express in. [As] for the following objections, that the Lord Christ was neither " husband nor wife, father nor tradesman," etc. (wherein yet possibly he is out in his account), I have frequently smiled at it when I have met with it in the Socinians, who are perking with it at every turn; but here it ought to be admired. But yet, without troubling those bugbears the schoolmen, he may be pleased to take notice, that the grace of duty and obedience in all relations is the same, — the relations admirdstering only an external occasion unto its peculiar exercise; and what our Lord Jesus Christ did in the ful- filling of all righteousness in the circumstances and relations wherein he stood, may be imputed to us for our righteousness in all our rela- tions, every act of duty and sin in them respecting the same law and principle. And hereon all his following exceptions for sundry pages, wherein he seems much to have pleased himself, do fall to nothing, as being resolved into his own mistakes, if he doth not prevaricate against his science and conscience ; for the sum of them all he gives us in these words, p. 204, " That Christ did those things as media- tor which did not belong to the laws of his mediation;" which, in what sense he did so, is fully explained in my discourse. And I am apt to guess, that either he is deceived or doth design to deceive, in expressing it by the " laws of his mediation ;" which may comprise all the laws which as mediator he was subject unto. And so it is most tnie, that he did nothing as mediator but what belonged unto the laws of his mediation; but most false, that I have affirmed that he did : for I did distinguish between that peculiar law which required the public acts of his mediation, and those other laws which, as me- diator, he was made subject unto. And if he neither doth nor will understand these things when he is told them, and they are proved unto him beyond what he can contradict, I know no reason why I should trouble myself with one that contends with his own mormos, though he never so lewdly or loudly call my name upon them. And whereas I know myself sufficiently subject unto mistakes and slips, so when I actually fall into them, as I shall not desire this man's for- giveness, but leave him to exercise the utmost of his severity, so I despise his ridiculous attempts to represent contradictions in my dis- course, p. 306; all pretences whereunto are taken from his own igno- rance, or feigned in his imagination. Of the like nature are all his ensuing cavils. I desire no more of any reader, but to peruse the places in my discourse which he carpeth at, and if he be a person of ordinary tmderstanding in these things, I declare that I will stand to
353 A VINDICATION CF
his censure and judgment, without giving him the least farther inti- mation of the sense and intendment of wliat I have written, or vin- dication of its truth. Thus, whereas I had plainly declared that the way whereby the Lord Christ, in his own person, became obnoxious and subject unto the law of creation, was by his own voluntary an- tecedent choice, otherwise than it is with those who are inevitably subject unto it by natural generation under it; as also, that the hypo- statical union, in the first instant whereof the human nature was fitted for glory, might have exempted him from the obligation of any out- ward law whatever, — whence it appears that his consequential obedi- ence, though necessary to himself, when he had sul^mitted himself unto the law (as, " Lo, I come to do thy will, O God"), was de- signedly for us ; — he miserably perplexeth himself to abuse his credu- lous readers with an apprehension that I had talked, like himself, at such a rate of nonsense as any one in his wits must needs despise. The meaning and sum of my discourse he would have to be this, p. 308, " That Christ had not been bound to live like a man, had he not been a man," with I know not what futilous cavils of the like nature; when all that I insisted on was the reason why Christ would be a man, and live like a man; which was, that we might receive the benefit and profit of his obedience, as he was our mediator. So in the close of the same wise harangue, from my saying, " That the Lord Christ, by virtue of the hypostatical union, might be exempted, as it were, and lifted above the law, which yet he willingly submitted unto, and in the same instant wherein he was made of a woman, was made also under the law, whence obedience unto it became necessary unto him," — the man feigns I know not what contradictions in his fancy, whereof there is not the least appearance in the words imto any one who understands the matter expressed in them. And that the assumption of the human nature into union with the Son of God, with submission unto the law thereon to be performed in that nature, are distinct parts of the himiiliation of Christ, I shall prove when more serious occasion is administered unto me.