OF ORIGINAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 83
spouslble to the justice of God, they labour to draw down our first parents, even from the instant of their forming, into the same condition wherein we are engaged by reason of corrupted nature. But, truly, I fear they will scarce obtain so prosperous an issue of their endeavour as Mohammed had when he promised the people he would call a mountain unto him; which miracle when they assembled to behold, but the mountain would not stir for all his calling, he replied, " If the mountain will not come to Mohammed, Mohammed will go to the mountain," and away he packed towards it. For we shall find that our Arminians can neither themselves climb the high mountain of innocency, nor yet call it down into the valley of sin and corruption wherein they are lodged. We have seen already how vain and frustrate was their former attempt : let us now take a view of their aspiring insolence, in making the pure creatures of God, holy and undefiled with any sin, to be invested with the same wretchedness and perverseness of nature with ourselves.
It is not my intention to enter into any curious discourse concern- ing the state and grace of Adam before his fall, but only to give a faithfid assent to what God himself affirmed of all the works of his hands, — they were exceeding good. No evil, no deformity, or any- thing tending thereunto, did immediately issue from that Fountain of goodness and wisdom; and therefore, doubtless, man, the most excellent work of his hands, the greatest glory of his Creator, was then without spot or blemish, endued with all those perfections his nature and state of obedience was capable of And careful we must be of casting any aspersions of defect on him that we will not with equal boldness ascribe to the image of God.
Nothing doth more manifest the deviation of our nature from its first institution, and declare the corruption wherewith we are pol- luted, than that propensity which is in us to every thing that is evil; that inclination of the flesh which lusteth always against the Spirit; that lust and concupiscence which fomenteth, conceiveth, hatcheth, bringeth foi'th, and nourislieth sin; that perpetual proneness that is in unregenerate nature to every thing that is contrary to the pure and holy law of God. Now, because neither Scripture nor experience will sufter Christians quite to deny this pravity of our nature, this averseness from all good and propensity to sin, the Arminians ex- tenuate as much as they are able, affirming that it is no great matter, no more than Adam was subject unto in the state of innocency. But, what ! did God create in Adam a proneness unto evil ? was that a part of his glorious image in whose likeness he was framed ? Yea, saith Corvinus, ^ " By reason of his creation, man had an affection to
1 " Ex ratione creationis homo habebat affectum ad ea qute Tetabantur." — Corv. ad Molin., cap. vi. sect. 1.
84 A DISPLAY OF ARMINIANISM.
what was forbidden by the law." But yet this seems injustice, that ^ " God should give a man a law to keep, and put upon his nature a repugnancy to that law ; " as one of them affirmed at the synod of Dort. "No/' saith the former author; ^"man had not been fit to have had a law given unto him, had he not been endued with a pro- pension and natural inclination to that which is forbidden by the law," But why is this so necessary in men rather than angels? No doubt there was a law, a nile for their obedience, given unto them at their first creation, which some transgressed, when others kept it inviolate. Had they also a propensity to sin concreated with their nature? had they a natural affection put upon them by God to that which was forbidden by the law? Let them only who will be wise beyond the word of God affix such injustice on the righteous Judge of all the earth. But so it seems it must be. ^" There was an inclination in man to sin before the fall, though not altogether so vehement and inordinate as it is now," saith Arminius. Hitherto we have thought that the original righteousness wherein Adam was created had com- prehended the integrity and perfection of the whole man; not only that whereby the body was obedient unto the soul, and all the affec- tions subservient to the rule of reason for the performance of all natu- ral actions, but also a light, uprightness, and holiness of grace in the mind and will, whereby he was enabled to yield obedience unto God for the attaining of that supernatural end whereunto he was created. No; but ■*" original righteousness," say our new doctors, "was no- thing but a bridle to help to keep man's inordinate concupiscence within bounds:" so that the faculties of our souls were never endued with any proper innate holiness of their own. ^" In the spiritual death of sin there are no spiritual gifts properly wanting m the will, because they were never there," say the six collocutors at the Hague.
The sum is, man was created with a natui'e not only weak and im- perfect, unaljle l)y its native strength and endowments to attain that supernatural end for which he was made, and which he was com- manded to seek, but depraved also with a love and desire of things repugnant to the will of God, by reason of an inbred inclination to Binning. It doth not properly belong to this place to show how they extenuate those gifts also with which they cannot deny but that he