Ans. 1. If any such places be found, yet it is confessed that it is an unusual sense of the word, and a thousand places of that kind will not enforce it to be so taken in another place, unless the cir- cumstances of it and matter whereabout it treateth enforce that sense, and will not bear that which is pi-oper.
2. Mr Goodwin doth not make it good by the instances he pro- duceth that the word is tied up in any place to denote precisely only the being of a thing, without relation to its abiding and continuance. Of the one, John xiv. 1 7, "But ye knoAv him, because he abideth with you, and shall be in you," saith he, " The latter clause, ' Shall be in you,' will be found a mere tautology if the other phrase, ' Abideth with you,' importeth a perpetual residence or in-being." But that this phrase, " Abideth with you," importeth the same with the phrase in the foregoing verse, where it is clearly expounded by the addition of the term " For ever" (" That he may abide with you for ever"), I suppose cannot be questioned. Nor, —
5. Is there any the least appearance of a tautology in the words, his remaining Avith believers being the thing promised, and his in- being the manner of his abode with them. Also 1 John iii. 14,
XV.] THE SINS OF BELIEVERS CONSIDERED. 577
Mivti Iv rOj '^avdrtfi, doth not simply denote an estate or condition, but an estate or condition in its nature, without the interposition of al- mighty grace, abiding and permanent; so that neither have we yet any instance of resti'aining the significancy of the word, as pretended, produced ; nor, if any place could be so, would it in the least enforce that acceptation of the word in this place contended about. Where- fore Mr Goodwin, as I said, addeth an argument to evince that the word must necessarily be taken in the sense by him insisted on in this place ; which is indeed a course to the purpose, if his argument prove so in any measure; it is this: "Because such a signification of it would render the sense altogether inconsistent with the scope of the apostle, wdiich is to exhort Christians unto righteousness and love of the brethren. Now, it is contrary to common sense itself to signify unto those whom we persuade to any duty any such thing as imports an absolute certainty or necessity of their doing it, whether they take care or use any means for the doing of it or no ; and a clear case it is that the certainty of a perpetual remaining of the seed of God in those that are born of him importeth a like certainty of their per- petual performance of that duty whereunto they are exhorted."
Ans. If this be all, it might have been spared. The argument consisteth of two parts: — 1. An aspersion of the infinite wisdom of God with a procedure contrary to all reason and common sense. 2. A begging of the thing in question betwixt its author and its ad- versaries. That there is any thing at all in the text, even according to our interpretation of it, that importeth an absolute necessity of men's doing any thing, whether they take care to use the means of doing it or no, the reader must judge. The abiding of the seed is that, we say, which shall effectually cause them in whom it is to use the means of not sinning, that eventually they may not do so; and that a certainty of the use of means is imported is no argument to prove that their necessity of persevering is proved, whether they use means or no. To take care to use means is amongst the means appointed to be used; and this they shall do upon the account of the abiding seed. That, indeed, which is opposed is, that God can- not promise to work eftectually in us by the use of means, for the ac- complishment of an appointed end, but that withal he rendereth use- less and vain all his exhortations to us to use those means. This is Mr Goodwin's argument from the place itself, to enforce that im- proper acceptation of the words " Kemaineth in us."
What remaineth of Mr Goodwin's long discourse upon this text of Scripture is but a fencing with himself, and raising of objections and answering of them suitably to his own principles, wherein we are not in the least concerned. There is not any thing from the be- ginning to the end of it that tendeth to impeach our interpretation of the place, or impede the progress of our argument, but only a
VOL. XL S7
578 DOCTRINE OF THE SAINTS' PERSEVERANCE. [CHAP.
flourish set up on Lis own exposition ; which if he were desired to give in briefly, and in terms of a plain, downright significancy, I am verily persuaded he would be hardly put to it to let us know what his mind and conceptions of this place of Scripture are. But of this subject, and in answer to his fifth argument, with the chapter, this is the issue.
CHAPTER XVI.
THE BEARING OF THE DOCTRINE OF THE SAINTS' APOSTASY ON THEIR CONSOLATION.