(5.) It may be lawful where the church is wholly negligent in its duty, and persists in that negligence, after admonition, in providing, according to their abilities, for the outward necessity of their pastor and his family. But this case cannot be determined without the consideration of many particular circumstances.
(6.) Where all or many of these causes concur, so as that a man cannot cheerfully and comfortably go on in the discharge of his office, especially if he be pressed in point of conscience, through the church's noncompliance with their duty with respect unto any of the institu- tions of Christ, and if the edification of the church, which is at pre- sent obstructed, may be provided for, in their own judgment, after a due manner, there is no such grievous yoke laid by the Lord Christ on the necks of any of his servants but that such a person may peace- ably lay down his office in such a church, and either abide in a pri- vate station, or take the care of another church, wherein he may discharge his office (being yet of ability) imto his own comfort and their edification.
OF THE OFFICE OF TEACHERS IN THE CHURCH. 97
CHAPTER VL
Of the office of teachers in the church, or an inqiury into the state, condition, and work of those called teachers in the Scripture.
The Lord Christ hath given unto his church "pastors and teachers," Eph. iv. 11. He hath " set in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers," 1 Cor. xii. 28. In the church that was at Antioch there were " prophets and teachers," Acts xiii. 1; and their work is both described and assigned unto them, as we shall see after- ward.
But the thoughts of learned men about those who in the Scripture are called teachers are very various, nor is the determination of their state and condition easy or obvious, as we shall find in our inquiry.
If there were originally a distinct office of teachers in the church, it was lost for many ages; but yet there was always a shadow or appearance of it retained, first in public catechists, and then in doc- tors or professors of theology in the schools belonging unto any church. But this, as unto the title of doctor or teacher, is but a late invention; for the occasion of it rose about the year of Christ 1135. Lotharius the emperor having found in Italy a copy of the Roman civil law, and being greatly taken with it, he ordained that it should be publicly read and expounded in the schools. This he began, by the direction of Imerius his chancellor, at Bononia; and to give encou- ragement unto this employment, they ordained that those who were the public professors of it should be solemnly created doctors ; of whom Bulgarus Hugolinus, with others, were the first. Not long after, this rite of creating doctors was borrowed of the lawyers by divines who publicly taught divinity in their schools; and this imitation first took place in Bononia, Paris, and Oxford. But this name is since grown a title of honour to sundry sorts of persons, whether unto any good use or purpose or no I know not ; but it is in use, and not worth con- tending about, especially if, as vmto some of them, it be fairly recon- cilable unto that of our Saviour, Matt, xxiii. 8.
But the custom of having in the church teachers that did publicly explain and vindicate the principles of religion is far more ancient, and of known usage in the primitive churches. Such was the prac- tice of the church of Alexandria in their school, wherein the famous Pantaenus, Origen, and Clemens, were teachers ; an imitation whereof has been continued in all ages of the church.
And, indeed, the continuation of such a peculiar work and employ- ment, to be discharged in manner of an office, is an evidence that originally there was such a distinct office in the church ; for although in the Roman church they had instituted sundry orders of sacred officers, borrowed from the Jews or Gentiles, which have no resem-
VOL. XVI. 7
98 TRUE NATURE OF A GOSPEL CHURCH.
Llance unto any thing mentioned in the Scripture, yet sundry things abused and corrupted by them in churcli-oiSficers took their occasional rise from what is so mentioned.
There are four opinions concerning those who are called by this name in the New Testament: —
1. Some say that no office at all is denoted by it, it being only a general appellation of those that taught others, whether constantly or occasionally. Such were the prophets in the church of Corinth, that spake occasionally and in their turns, 1 Cor. xiv. ; which is that which all might do who had ability for it, verses 5, 24, 25.
2. Some say it is only another name for the same office with that of a pastor, and so not [intended] to denote any distinct office ; of which mind Jerome seems to be, Eph. iv.
8. Others allow that it was a distinct office, wliereunto some were called and set apart in the church, but it was only to teach (and that in a peculiar manner) the principles of religion, but had no interest in the rule of the church or the administration of the sacred mysteries. So the pastor in the church was to rule, and teach, and administer the sacred mysteries; the teacher to teach or instruct only, but not to rule nor dispense the sacraments; and the ruling elder to rule only, and neither to teach nor administer sacraments; — which hath the appearance of order, both useful and beautiful.