A Brighter Day Begins with His Word.

James Hastings • SECTION 565

Section 565

← Dictionary of the Apostolic Church — Volume 1

Literature. — E. von Dobschiitz, Christian Life in the Primi- tive Church, Eng. tr., 1904 ; A. Harnack, Die Mission und Ausbreitung des Christentums in den ersten drei Jahrhun- derten'^, 1906, i. 127-171 (Eng. tr., Mission and Expansion^, 1908, i. 147-198). Cf. also the Literature at the end of the art. Communion. E. VON DOBSCHUTZ.

FESTUS. — No information is forthcoming con- cerning Porcius Festus, who succeeded Felix in the procuratorship of Judaea, other than that supplied by Ac 24^'^ 26*^ and by Josephus, A^it. XX. viii. 9f., ix. 1, and BJ IL xiv. 1. According to Josephus, Festus set himself with vigour and success to restore order to his province, which he found distracted with sedition and overrun by bands of robbers. ' He caught the greatest part of the robbers, and destroyed a great many of them.' More particularly it is added that he ' sent forces, both horsemen and footmen, to fall upon those that had been seduced by a certain impostor, who pro- mised them deliverance and freedom from the miseries they were under, if they would but follow him as far as the wilderness. Accordingly, those forces that were sent destroyed both him that had deluded them and those that were his followers also.' The only other incident in the administra- tion of Festus which Josephus relates shows him, in association with King Agrippa II., withstanding 'the chief men of Jerusalem' (Ant. XX. viii. 11), and permitting an appeal to Caesar — an interesting combination in view of the narrative in Acts. The circumstances, as stated by Josephus, were these : Agrippa had made an addition to his palace at Jerusalem, which enabled him to observe from his dining-hall what was done in the Temple. There- upon ' the chief men of Jerusalem ' erected a wall to obstruct the view from the palace. Festus sup- ported Agripjia in demanding the removal of this wall, but yielded to the request of the Jews that the whole matter might be referred to Nero, who upheld the appeal and reversed the judgment of his procurator.

Josephus evidently regards Festus as a wise and righteous official, affording an agreeable contrast to Albinus, his successor, of whom he says that ' there was not any sort of wickedness that could

FEVER

FIRE

407

be named but he had a hand in it' [BJ II. xiv. 1).

Turning to the Book of Acts, we find that there, while justice is done to the promptness with which Festus addressed himself to his duties and to the lip-homage he was ready to pay to ' the custom of the Romans,' he appears in a less favourable light, and the outstanding fact meets us of the estimate which St. Paul formed of him. St. Paul preferred to take his chance with Nero to leaving his cause to be disposed of by this fussy, plausible official. •I appeal unto Caesar,' is the lasting condemna- tion of Festus. He was persuaded that the Apostle was innocent of the ' many and grievous charges ' brought against him, yet he was quite prepared to sacrifice him, if thereby he 'could gain favour with the Jews ' ; hence the preposterous proposal of a re-trial at Jerusalem. The noble use which St. Paul made shortly after of the opportunity given him by Festus to speak for himself before Agrippa and Berenice should not blind us to the callousness of the man who planned that scene with all its pomp and circumstance, and deliberately exploited a prisoner in bonds for the entertainment of his Herodian guests. Festus died after holding his office for a brief term — ' scarcely two vears ' (Schurer, HJP I. ii. [1890] 185). See art. Dates for discussion of the chronology of the procuratorship of Festus.

Literature. — S. Buss, Roman Law and History in the NT, 1901, p. 390; C. H. Turner, 'Eusebius' Chronology of Felix and Festus ' in JThSt iii. [1001-02] 120; G. H. Morrison, The Footsteps of the Flock, 1904, p. 362 ; M. Jones, St. Paxil the Orator, l9io, p. 212 ; A. Maclaren, Expositions : ' Acts, ch. xiii.-end,' 1907, p. 322. G. P. GoULD.

FEYER.— In the single passage (Ac 28^) in which the word occurs, it is associated with dysentery iq.v.). Fever is a rise in bodily temperature above the normal of 98 '4° F. It may be caused bj- physio- logical conditions — a mechanical interference with the nervous system which prevents heat-elimina- tion, as in sunstroke. It is also a symptom of the reaction of the body to infection by micro-organisms or other poisons by which the heat-regulation apparatus is disturbed. The effects of this are evident in further derangements in the digestive glands, the liver and kidneys, the alimentary canal, the nervous organism, and the blood. The name is given to many diseases of which fever is the leading symptom, as e.g. typhoid fever. At a time when it was not possible to explain diseases by reference to a single cause, it was very natural to describe the derangement by two or more of the principal symptoms, as in the instance under con- sideration. C. A. Beckwith.

FIELD OF BLOOD.— See Akeldama.

FIG, FIG-TREE {(rvKT], cvkov, SXw^os).— Apart from the three references in the Gospels (Mt 7^^, Mk 11'^ Lk e^'*), figs are mentioned only twice in the NT (Ja 3'-, Rev 6^^) In James the ordinary words ffvKri, ' fig-tree,' and avKov, ' fig,' are used, but in Rev. oKwdos is the word emploj-ed to denote the fruit. The latter term designates a fig which grows during the winter under the leaves, but seldom ripens.

Public-domain historical reference work (1915–1916); OCR text from Internet Archive. Historical scholarship and terminology reflect its era; OCR may contain errors. Verify quotations and current scholarly claims independently.

Project Gutenberg source record →