[394] See above, pp. 125 f.
[395] See above, pp. 125 f. Nowack (1897) agrees that Cornill’s and others’ conclusion that vv. 9-20 are not Habakkuk’s is too sweeping. He takes the first, second and fourth of the taunt-songs as authentic, but assigns the third (vv. 12-14) and the fifth (18-20) to another hand. He deems the refrain, 8_b_ and 17_b_, to be a gloss, and puts 19 before 18. Driver, _Introd._, 6th ed., holds to the authenticity of all the verses.
[396] The text reads, _For also wine is treacherous_, under which we might be tempted to suspect some such original as, _As wine is treacherous, so_ (next line) _the proud fellow_, etc. (or, as Davidson suggests, _Like wine is the treacherous dealer_), were it not that the word _wine_ appears neither in the Greek nor in the Syrian version. Wellhausen suggests that היין, _wine_, is a corruption of הוי, with which the verse, like vv. 6_b_, 9, 12, 15, 19, may have originally begun, but according to 6_a_ the taunt-songs, opening with הוי, start first in 6_b_. Bredenkamp proposes וְאֶפֶס כְּאַיִן.
[397] The text is ינוה, a verb not elsewhere found in the Old Testament, and conjectured by our translators to mean _keepeth at home_, because the noun allied to it means _homestead_ or _resting-place_. The Syriac gives _is not satisfied_, and Wellhausen proposes to read ירוה with that sense. See Davidson’s note on the verse.
[398] A.V. _thick clay_, which is reached by breaking up the word עבטיט, _pledge_ or _debt_, into עב, _thick cloud_, and טיט, _clay_.
[399] Literally _thy biters_, נשכיך, but נשך, _biting_, is _interest_ or _usury_, and the Hiphil of נשך is _to exact interest_.
[400] LXX. sing., Heb. pl.
[401] These words occur again in ver. 17. Wellhausen thinks they suit neither here nor there. But they suit all the taunt-songs, and some suppose that they formed the refrain to each of these.
[402] Dynasty or people?
[403] So LXX.; Heb. _cutting off_.
[404] The grammatical construction is obscure, if the text be correct. There is no mistaking the meaning.
[405]Heb. כפיס, not elsewhere found in the O.T., is in Rabbinic Hebrew both _cross-beam_ and _lath_.
[406] Micah iii. 10.
[407] Jer. xxii. 13.
[408] Literally _fire_.
[409] Jer. li. 58: which original?
[410] After Wellhausen’s suggestion to read מסף חמתו instead of the text מספח חמתך, _adding_, or _mixing_, _thy wrath_.
[411] So LXX. Q.; Heb. _their_.
[412] Read הרעל (cf. Nahum ii. 4; Zech. xii. 2). The text is הערל, not found elsewhere, which has been conjectured to mean _uncover the foreskin_. And there is some ground for this, as parallel to _his nakedness_ in the previous clause. Wellhausen also removes the first clause to the end of the verse: _Drink also thou and reel; there comes to thee the cup in Jehovah’s right hand, and thou wilt glut thyself with shame instead of honour._
[413] So R.V. for קיקלון, which A.V. has taken as two words—קי for which cf. Jer. xxv. 27, where however the text is probably corrupt, and קלון. With this confusion cf. above, ver. 6, עבטיט.
[414] Read with LXX. יחתך for יחיתן of the text.
[415] See above, ver. 8.
[416] תָּפוּשׂ?