Whiston’s work (p. 450) is _An Essay towards restoring the True Text of the O. T. and for vindicating the Citations made thence in the N. T._, 1722, pp. 93 ff. (not seen). Besides those mentioned on p. 452 (see n. 1293) as supporting the unity of Zechariah there ought to be named De Wette, Umbreit, von Hoffmann, Ebrard, etc. Kuiper’s work (p. 458) is _Zacharia_ 9-14, Utrecht, 1894 (not seen). Nowack’s conclusions are: ix.—xi. 3 date from the Greek period (we cannot date them more exactly, unless ix. 8 refers to Ptolemy’s capture of Jerusalem in 320); xi., xiii. 7-9, are post-exilic; xii.—xiii. 6 long after Exile; xiv. long after Exile, later than “Malachi.”
[1279] Except in the passage ix. 10-12, which seems strangely out of place in the rest of ix.—xiv.
[1280] _Works_, 4th ed. 1677, pp. 786 ff. (1632), 834. Mede died 1638.
[1281] Matt. xxvii. 9.
[1282] _Demonstration of the Messias_, 1700.
[1283] _An Attempt towards an Improved Version of the Twelve Minor Prophets_, 1785 (not seen). See also Wright on Archbishop Seeker.
[1284] _Die Weissagungen, welche bei den Schriften des Proph. Sacharja beygebogen sind, übersetzt_, etc., Hamburg (not seen).
[1285] _Einleitung in A. u. N. T._ (not seen).
[1286] Isa. viii. 2. See above, p. 265.
[1287] ix. 1.
[1288] See above, Chap. XXXI.
[1289] x. 10.
[1290] ix. 10, 13, etc.
[1291] _Dan. u. Sacharja._
[1292] Page 503.
[1293] See Addenda, p. 462.
[1294] _Einl._ in the beginning of the century.
[1295] _Neue Exeg. krit. Aehrenlese z. A. T._, 1864.
[1296] _Einl._, 1882, p. 709.
[1297] _Z.A.T.W._, 1881, 1882. See further proof of the late character of language and style, and of the unity, by Eckardt, _Z.A.T.W._, 1893, pp. 76 ff.
[1298] § 81, n. 3, 10. See p. 457, end of note 1310.
[1299] _Jewish Quart. Review_, 1889.
[1300] _Einl._⁴
[1301] _A. T. Litt._
[1302] _Untersuchung über die Komposition u. Abfassungszeit von Zach._ 9-14, etc. Halle, 1891 (not seen).
[1303] 1892: quoted by Wildeboer.
[1304] 1893: quoted by Wildeboer.
[1305] _Doctrine of the Prophets_, 438 ff., in which the English reader will find a singularly lucid and fair treatment of the question. See, too, Wright.
[1306] Page 472, Note A.
[1307] Kautzsch—the Greek period.
[1308] Above, pp. 451 f.
[1309] Robinson, pp. 76 ff.
[1310] _Z.A.T.W._, 1893, 76 ff. See also the summaries of linguistic evidence given by Robinson. Kuenen finds in ix.—xi. the following pre-exilic elements: ix. 1-5, 8-10, 13_a_ (?); x. 1 f., 10 f.; xi. 4-14 or 17.
[1311] Kuenen.
[1312] See above, p. 453, n. 1297.
[1313] See also Robinson.
[1314] _Jewish Quarterly Review_, 1889, p. 81.
[1315] As Robinson, _e.g._, does.
[1316] E.g. _holy land_, ii. 16, and _Mount of Olives_, xiv. 4.
[1317] _Op. cit._, 103-109: cf. Driver, _Introd._⁶, 354.
[1318] _Introd._⁶, p. 354.
[1319] ix. 13.
[1320] ix. 1 f.
[1321] x. 11. See above, p. 451.
[1322] See above, pp. 331 ff., for proof of the original anonymity of the Book of “Malachi.”
[1323] Above, p. 331.