Ver. 18 (B.C. 190).--Antiochus therefore "_sets his face in another direction_," and tries to conquer the islands and coasts of Asia Minor. But a captain--the Roman general, Lucius Cornelius Scipio Asiaticus--puts an end to the insolent scorn with which he had spoken of the Romans, and pays him back with equal scorn,[688] utterly defeating him in the great Battle of Magnesia (B.C. 190), and forcing him to ignominious terms.
Ver. 19 (B.C. 175).--Antiochus next turns his attention ("_sets his face_") to strengthen the fortresses of his own land in the east and west; but making an attempt to recruit his dissipated wealth by the plunder of the Temple of Belus in Elymais, "_stumbles and falls, and is not found_."
THIRD SECTION (vv. 20-27).--Events under Seleucus Philopator down to the first attempts of Antiochus Epiphanes against Egypt (B.C. 170).
Ver. 20.--Seleucus Philopator (B.C. 187-176) had a character the reverse of his father's. He was no restless seeker for glory, but desired wealth and quietness.[689] Among the Jews, however, he had a very evil reputation, for he sent an _exactor_--a mere tax-collector, Heliodorus--"_to pass through the glory of the kingdom_."[690] He only reigned twelve years, and then was "broken"--_i.e._, murdered by Heliodorus, neither in anger nor in battle, but by poison administered by this "tax-collector." The versions all vary, but I feel little doubt that Dr. Joël is right when he sees in the curious phrase _nogesh heder malkooth_, "one that shall cause a raiser of taxes to pass over the kingdom"--of which neither Theodotion nor the Vulgate can make anything--a cryptographic allusion to the name _Heliodorus_;[691] and possibly the predicted fate may (by a change of subject) also refer to the fact that Heliodorus was checked, not by force, but by the vision in the Temple (2 Macc. v. 18, iii. 24-29). We find from 2 Macc. iv. 1 that Simeon, the governor of the Temple, charged Onias with a trick to terrify Heliodorus. This is a very probable view of what occurred.[692]
Ver. 21.--Seleucus Philopator died B.C. 175 without an heir. This made room for a contemptible person, a reprobate, who had no real claim to royal dignity,[693] being only a younger son of Antiochus the Great. He came by surprise, "_in time of security_," and obtained the kingdom by flatteries.[694]
Ver. 22.--Yet "_the overflowing wings of Egypt_" (or "the arms of a flood") "_were swept away before him and broken; yea, and even a covenanted or allied prince_." Some explain this of his nephew Ptolemy Philometor, others of Onias III., "the prince of the covenant"--_i.e._, the princely high priest, whom Antiochus displaced in favour of his brother, the apostate Joshua, who Græcised his name into Jason, as his brother Onias did in calling himself Menelaus.[695]
Ver. 23.--This mean king should prosper by deceit which he practised on all connected with him;[696] and though at first he had but few adherents, he should creep into power.
Ver. 24.--"_In time of security shall he come, even upon the fattest places of the province._" By this may be meant his invasions of Galilee and Lower Egypt. Acting unlike any of his royal predecessors, he shall lavishly scatter his gains and his booty among needy followers,[697] and shall plot to seize Pelusium, Naucratis, Alexandria, and other strongholds of Egypt for a time.
Ver. 25.--After this (B.C. 171) he shall, with a "_great army_," seriously undertake his first invasion of Egypt, and shall be met by his nephew Ptolemy Philometor with another immense army. In spite of this, the young Egyptian King shall fail through the treachery of his own courtiers. He shall be outwitted and treacherously undermined by his uncle Antiochus. Yes! even while his army is fighting, and many are being slain, the very men who "_eat of his dainties_," even his favourite and trusted courtiers Eulæus and Lenæus, will be devising his ruin, and his army shall be swept away.