And the reason of my writing at all, is owing to a book newly published¹ in defence of bishop _Warburton_, in which your lordship, is charged with a multitude of contradictions, and inconsistencies relating to this point.
¹ Free and candid examination of the bishop of London’s sermons, &c.
It is not my design to enter here as an assistant to your lordship. For this is quite needless.
My intention is, as mentioned in the title page. And because bishop _Warburton_ has owned this writer, as a most able defender of his scheme. I have taken occasion to shew, that it is a scheme so contrary to scripture, and the truth of things, as no art of words, or stretch of genius, however powerful in paradox, can ever be able to support.
The author of this book, as bishop _Warburton_ assures us,¹ is too modest to make his name known to the world; a quality, which from the reading of his book, one would not suspect to be so predominate in him.――But though modesty has forced him to conceal his name, yet he has given us some information of his character. He begins; “I, who am a bare looker-on, and absolutely disengaged from all that biass of affection, which is so wont to warp the followers of an old system, or the inventers of a new, have done my best to examine this question with all impartiality.”²
¹ Preface to critical enquiry, &c.
² Examination p. 2.
Had one of the antient writers of _Greece_ said this of himself, how positive, might a modern critic have been, from the decisive words, a _bare looker-on_, that he had never wrote upon the same subject before? And that therefore, any book of that kind ascribed to him, must infallibly be false and spurious. And yet, to the confusion of criticism, this author, who unasked, and of his own free motion, declares, that he begins this work as a bare looker-on, has for more than ten years before he made this declaration, been sweating in the thickest dust, and heat of Doctor _Warburton_’s most ardent contention for novelties.¹
¹ Critical enquiry, &c. published 1746.
I have the Doctor’s own words for this, both for the novelties, and this gentleman’s wonderful zeal, and skill shewn in the defence of them, so many years ago.
“Notwithstanding, says the Doctor, all that can be said, much clamour will ever attend novelties, though never so strongly proved.――But truth seldom thrives the worse, for unreasonable opposition; and it would seem (N. B.) _not to be far from its establishment_, when such writers, as the following, appear in its defence――He hath established what he undertook to defend, with such extent of learning, and force of good argument, that I dare become responsible for all he says; and am willing, that those of my opinions here debated, may stand, or fall, by the strength, or the invalidity of this defence.”¹
¹ Preface to the critical enquiry, p. 10.
This compliment, so very hearty, as well as elegant, puts me in mind of another, which the learned Doctor made some time since, to the whole clergy of this nation; “a body of men, says he, the most learned, virtuous, and truly Christian, that ever adorned a church, or state.”¹
¹ D. L. Vol. 2. Preface, p. 6.
These two compliments are of so very high a strain, that were it not for the gravity of the Doctor’s character, and the seriousness of the subject, the reader might have thought himself obliged to understand them both ironically. But if the Doctor meant no more by this, than to buy a peace with the clergy, it must however be said, that he gave more for the purchase of it, than a man of a scrupulous conscience would have given.
However the compliment paid to this modest gentleman (who to be sure will, now never be able to let the world know his name) seems to have been comfortably received in secret, by the ample return he has made the Doctor for it, in his new book. Where, speaking of a part of the Doctor’s performance, he says, “For this answer, I must refer the reader to the _D. L._ where he will find the subject handled with that force, solidity, and precision of argument, which so eminently distinguish the author from all his cotemporaries.”
I shall now only just observe, that the compliment made by the bishop to the clergy, has here very much abatement made to it, by his great ally. For as matters now stand, if this very clergy, good, learned, and Christian, beyond any thing ever heard of in the world before, should one and all unite in opposing the bishop, all that they could possibly get by their pains, would be only to shew, how eminently he stands distinguished by force, solidity, and precision of argument from all his cotemporaries.
But no more of this. Bishop _Warburton_ grounds his scheme, upon the doctrine of the Old and the New Testament. But seeing he affirms that to be of the greatest weight, which is taken from the New Testament, and this author also begins there, I shall do so likewise.