Gnom. on Gal. v. 8. — Rom. ii. 12, boo/ yap uvo/awc ^i.e . ovz sv vqj&ujJ r./Aciprov , dvo,aug \i.e. ou d/a i /o/aou] zai dmXoZvrai. — Eph. i. 3, EvXoyrjr'og 6 0sbg — 6 svXoy/jffag rifidg sv waGy svXoyia — It is in a different sense that God hath blessed us, and that we bless Him. — 1 Pet. iii. 1, ha xa / sinvsg
dns/bovG/ rti Xoyuj [i.e. the GospeI\ avsu Xoyov [i.e. speaking] zspbri-
OijGovrcci . See the Gnom. See Glassius, L. c. p. 2003.
ANTHYPOPHORA is part of a refutation by anticipation, when those things are refuted which may seem possible to be said in opposition to our opinion [the refutation of an adversary’s sup- posed objection]. See Gnom. on Heb. ii. 8. See below examples under the title Occupatio.
This Anthypophora, which answers to a foreseen objection , differs from the other of the same name, which refutes an objec- tion, brought forward by an adversary, by means of the opposition of a contrary sentiment expressed [Glassius’ Philol. S. L. V. Tract, ii. ch. vii. p. 2048].
ANTIPHRASIS [as Franc. Sanctius teaches in Minerva, L. iv. ch. xvi. p. 820, etc., where he for the most part explodes the Gram- marians’ notion of Antiphrasis] is a certain form of Irony, when we speak in such a way as to deny what ought to have been affirmed. But commonly an expression is universally so called, which signifies the contrary of what is put down : as 1 Cor. viii. 10, ou%l 37 Gws/br,Gig
o/zodofiTidiiGsrai sig ro ra s/bwXo&vra sad/s/v — shall be edified , literally;
whereas what is meant is, shall be impelled or instigated [to do some- thing bad]. Comp. Bauer’s Philol. Th. p. ch. xiv. 3, p. 303. — Acts xxvii. 8, with which comp. ver. 12. The Gnom. on the passages quoted (Comp. Hegelmaier’s Admonition concerning Antiphrasis, in the notes on Hofmann’s Demonstration of the Gospels, Tom. i. p. 17, note e).
ANTITHETA are, when contraries are opposed to contraries : which is done in a threefold manner , either so as that single words are opposed to single words , or pairs to pairs , or sentences to sentences [Ernesti Init. Rhet. § 351, pp. 171, 172] : for instance — Luke ii. 14, do^oc sv vAwroTg 0goD, zai Inri yr\g — sv avOpuKo/g : v . Gnom. — Rom. viii. 5, 0/ yap zeera, Gupza ovrsg , ra rr\g Gctpzog (ppovouG/v’ 0/ ds zaru cmD/O&a, ra rov rtvsbiLurog. — Ch. XV. 12, sGrai 37 p/£a rov Istftfa/, zai 6 av/ffra- (Asvog apxs/v sQ vbbv [Heb. DJ a banner], A root is at the lowest point : a banner rises to the highest. Gnom. on this passage, and on 2 Cor. iv. 17.
ANTONOMASIA is, when, instead of a proper name, a common name [an appellative], and this by the way of excellence, is employed, as in Acts iii. 14, u/AS/g S's rov ay/ov zai d/za/ov (i.e. JESUS) ipvijGaods. Comp. ch. vii. 52, xxii. 14. — Eph. i. 6, h ru> jjyacnj^ev^. — 2 Tim. i.