Vaughan, Robert Alfred: Hours with the Mystics. London. 2vols. 8d edition. 1879.
Westcott, Brooke Foss: Commentary on the Gospel of John. Speaker’s Commentary. New York, 1880.
Wetstein, John J.: Novum Testamentum Greecum, with various readings and commentary. 2 vols. Amsterdam, 1751.
A.V. Authorized Version.
Apoc. Apocalypse.
Cit. Cited.
= Equivalent to.
Expn. Explanation.
Lit. Literally.
Rev. Revised Version of the New Testament.
Rev. O. T. Revised Version of the Old Testament,
Sept. Septuagint Version of the Old Testament.
Sqq. Following.
Synop. Synoptists.
Tex. Rec. Received Text.
Tynd. Tyndale’s Version of the New Testament.
Vulg. Vulgate or Latin Translation of the New Testament.
Wyc. Wycliffe’s Version of the New Testament.
The phrase “only here in New Testament” refers to Greek words only,
Tr life of John covers a period from near the beginning of the first century to the beginning of the second. He was a native of Galilee, and, according to tradition, of the town of Bethsaida, which was on the western shore of the Lake, not far from Capernaum and Chorazin. His father was Zebedee. His mother, Salome (Mark xvi. 1; Matt. xx. 20), was among the women who supported the Lord with their substance (Luke viii. 3), and attended Him to His crucifixion (Mark xv. 40). The family was not without worldly means. Zebedee was a fisherman, and had hired servants in his employ (Mark i. 20). Salome ministered to Jesus, and John seems to have had his own house (John xix. 27). He was, apparently, one of the dis- ciples of John the Baptist ; and while engaged in his father’s craft, was found and called by Jesus (Matt. iv. 21; Mark i. 19). Of the two mentioned in John i. 35, only one, Andrew, is named (John i. 40); the other is commonly supposed to have been John, who suppresses his own name, as in other instances where he refers to himself (John xiv. 23; xviii. 15; xix. 26; Xx, 9,14, 85° 3x1:720).*
As soon as Jesus was made known to him, he became His enthusiastic disciple. His peculiar intimacy with our Lord is
* That he names himself in the Apocalypse, and not in the Gospel, is suffi- ciently explained by the fact that the Gospel is historical, intended to bring Christ into prominence and to keep the writer out of view. The Apocalypse, on the other hand, is prophetic, and the name of the author is required as a voucher for the revelations granted him. Compare Dan. vii. 15; viil. 27.