_Answ._ No: unless it be when he telleth the lender truly of his case, and he is willing to run the hazard; else it is mere thievery covered with the cheat of borrowing; for the borrower desireth that of another, which he would not lend him, if he expected it not again; and to take a man's money or goods against his will is robbery.
_Object._ But I am in great necessity.
_Answ._ Begging in necessity is lawful; but stealing or cheating is not, though you call it borrowing.
_Object._ But it is a shame to beg.
_Answ._ The sin of thievish borrowing is worse than shame.
_Object._ But none will give me if I beg.
_Answ._ If they will give but to save your life at the present, you must take it, though they give you not what you would have: the poorest beggar's life is better than the thief's.
_Object._ But I hope God may enable me to pay hereafter.
_Answ._ If you have no rational way to manifest the soundness of that hope to another, it is but to pretend faith and hope for thievery and deceit.
_Object._ God hath promised, that those that fear him shall want no good thing. And therefore I hope I may be able to repay it.
_Answ._ If you want not, why do you borrow? If you have enough to keep you alive by begging, God maketh good all his promises to you; yea, or if you die by famine. For he only promiseth you that which is best; which for aught you know may be beggary or death. God breaketh not promise with his servants who die in common famine, no more than with them who die in plagues or wars. Make not God the patron of sin; yea, and your faith a pretence for your distrust. If you trust God, use no sinful means; if you trust him not, this pleading of his promise is hypocrisy.
_Quest._ II. May a tradesman drive a trade with borrowed money, when his success, and so his repayment, is utterly an uncertain thing?
_Answ._ There are some trades where the gain is so exceeding probable, next to certain, as may warrant the borrowing of money to manage them, when there is no rational probability of failing in the payment. And there are some tradesmen, who have estates of their own, sufficient to repay all the money which they borrow. But otherwise, when the money is rationally hazardous, the borrower is bound in conscience to acquaint the lender fully with the hazard, that he may not have it against his will. Otherwise he liveth in constant deceit or thievery. And if he do happen to repay it, it excuseth not his sin.
_Quest._ III. If a borrower be utterly unable to pay, and so break while he hath something, may he not retain somewhat for his food or raiment?
_Answ._ No: unless it be in order to set up again in hope to repay his debts: for all that he hath being other men's, he may not take so much as bread to his mouth, out of that which is theirs, without their consent.
_Quest._ IV. But if a man have bound himself to his wife's friends upon marriage to settle so much upon her or her children, and this obligation was antecedent to his debts, may he not secure that to his wife or children, without any injury to his creditors?
_Answ._ The law of the land must much decide this controversy. If the propriety be actually before transferred to wife or children, it is theirs, and cannot be taken from them; but if it were done after by a deed of gift to defraud the creditors, then that deed of gift is invalid, till debts be paid. If it be but an obligation and no collation of propriety, the law must determine who is to be first paid; and whether the wife be supposed to run the hazard of gaining or losing with the husband: and though the laws of several countries herein differ, and some give the wife more propriety than others do, yet must they in each place be conscientiously observed, as being the rule of such propriety. But we must see that there be no fraudulent intent in the transaction.
_Quest._ V. May not a tradesman retain somewhat to set up again, if his creditors be willing to compound for a certain part of the debt?
_Answ._ If he truly acquaint them with his whole estate, and they voluntarily allow him part to himself, either in charity, or in hope hereafter to be satisfied, this is no unlawful course; but if he hide part from them, and make them believe that the rest is all, this is but a thievish procurement of their composition or consent.
_Quest._ VI. May a borrower lawfully break his day of promised payment, in case of necessity?