help we gain from the remembrance that we have confessed Christ our Lord, and pledged ourselves to do his work before "all the congregation," "before many witnesses."-C. Vers. 6-9, 14.-The human and Divine pri'esthood-contrast. The setting apart of Aaron for his life-work, ~he hil:\h priesthood of Israel, naturally suggests to us the entrance of our Great High Priest on the work which his Father gave him to do_ Between Aaron and Christ there are many points of resemblance (see below); there are also significant contrasts. Respecting "the High Priest of our profession" (Heb... iii. 2), it is not the case that there was- I. APPOINTMENT TO OFFICE IN VIRTUE OF HUMAN BIBTH. Aaron was chosen to the office of hi~h priest, partly in virtue of his descent from Levi (perhaps partly in virtue of his brotherhood to Moses). His personal qualities were not such as to make him, the most suitable man for the office, independently of considerations of lineal descent. and human relationship. Jesus Christ did not owe his position as our High Priest to- his human birth. He was not, indeed, of the tribe of Levi, but of Judah, "after the flesh." And though, through his mother, he was a son of David, in the matter oi human descent, this was not in any way material to his ascent to royal power. Hia- right of office came not thence. II. h!:PosrnG INAUGURAL CEREMONY. The scene described in this chapter was striking, :imposing, memorable ; it would long be borne in mind, never, indeed, for- gotten by those who witnessed it. It formed part of the national history. Imagina- tion on our part readily places before us the solemn and suggestive ceremonies which riveted the eyes of the congregation of Israel. Through no such solemnities did One greater t~an Aaron think well to pass as he entered on his work. It is said that his contemporaries expected the Messiah to descead amongst them from the heavens while they were worshippiag in the temple. This he distinctly refused to do (Matt. iv. 5--7). The ceremony of the baptism by John was simple in the extreme. Long chapters of Old Testament Scripture (Exodus and Leviticus) are occupied in narrating the inaugural ceremonies of the human priesthood ; five verses suffice to chronicle those of the Divine (Matt. iii. 13-17). 'l'he profounder work of the Lord from heaven was more fittingly commenced by that quiet scene on the banks of Jordan. Ill. OUTWARD AND VISIDLE DISTINCTION. (Vers. 7-9.) The appearance of Aaron ancl of his successors in their pontifical attire, as described in this chapter, with rich and coloured garments about them, and the mitre on their head glitteriag with golden diadem, must have been impressive and imposing enough in the eyes of the people. How striking the contrast with him who was the carpenter's Son of Nazareth, who shunned all ostentation and parade (Matt. xii. 19), who had "no beauty" (of out- ward appearance) "that we should desire him" (Isa. liii. 2), who attracted disciples to his feet, and sinners to his side, only by the wisdom of his words, and the grace of his spirit and the beauty of his life I IV. NEED OF PURIFICATION, "Moses brought Aaron and his sons, and washed them with water" (ver. 6). It was needful that they should go through a ceremony which, signified the putting away of" all filthiness of the flesh and spirit" (2 Cor. viL 1). No need of this in the case of the holy Saviour. Whatever his baptism sigaified, it did not mean this. He was "a High Priest, holy, harmless, undefiled," requiring no cleansiag streams whatever (Heb. vii. 26; eee John xiv. 30). V. NEED OF PABDON. "And he brought the bullock for the sin offering: and Aaron,'" etc. (ver. H). Before the human high priest could be admitted to the altar, his own sin must be forgiven. Christ entered on his work, not neediag to present any oblation. With him, as he was, the Divine Father was "well pleased" (Matt. iii. 17). In entering on any work to which we may be called of God, we must remember tha~ (1) we have need to purify ourselves of the sin-stains that are left on the soul; (2) w. have need to seek for pardon for a faulty past before we go forth to a new future; (a;. we may be careless of outward distinctioas, considering the lowliness of our Lord.-C. Vera. 7-9.-The human and Divine prlesthood-wmparison. Between the priesthoo! of Aaron and that of the Lord Jesus Christ there are not only points of contrast (se, above) but also of resemblancll. 'l'he "holy garments" in which the human prieat fflW' <llL Vlll, 1-36.] 'l'HE BOOK OF LEVITICUS. 133
Frederick Meyrick [1827-1906] • SECTION 172
The Pulpit Commentary — Leviticus — Section 172
← The Pulpit Commentary — Leviticus
Public domain historical Pulpit Commentary. Source page identifies the volume as Public Domain; text extracted from its historical PDF.