But in rude ages it is eminently desirable that savage spirits should contemplate as a dead certainty getting as much as they give.1 Let us notice one or two points. I. Tm!: LAW OF RETALIATION, ADMINISTERED IN A JUllICIAL BPmIT, WAS IN TH!ll INTERESTS oF JUSTICE AND ORDER. Its principle is a sound one. 'l'he criminal is to get exactly what he gave. It is only in this way that the nature of a crime can be d:iven home to a rud~ and tyrannical nature. If he has been cruel to a neighbour, let him taste the effect himself of the same amount of cruelty. A man who victimizes his neighbours will cease doing so if he finds that he is to be victimized in exactly the same fashion by public law. In fact, he comes to consider his own case as bound up most intimately with his neighbours', and, instead of indulging in cruelty he by his better conduct ensures his personal peace. ' And a distinct corollary of this law of retaliation is the penalty of murder (vers. 17 21). If a man deliberately puts his brother out of life, it is an injury which admits of no repair, and so death becomes its just penalty. . II. THE LAW OF RETALIATION IS IN ONE RESPECT A PREPARATION FOR TIIE GOLDEN RULE. For the golden rule runs parallel to it. It is, so to speak, its glorious issue. "Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye eveD so to them: for this is the Law and the prophets" (Matt. vii. 12). Yes, this very law of retaliation suggests to every thoughtful mind whether it would not be better to try the opposite plan, and do to others, not what we should be afraid they would do to us, but wLat we would like them to do to us. In other words, let us wisely win the good services of others, if we are to receive what we give, by doing all to them and for them that we would welcome ourselves. And indeed, the reason why the golden rule does not prevail as widely as it might, is because immediate justice is not now executed as in the case of a law of retaliation it is. The return of kindness is often impeded by ingratitude, and men may do good to others for a long lifetime without receiving much thanks. But such an arrangement gives a field for faith and courage, such as a government of instantaneous justice could not secure. In truth, we should become mere mercenaries if the golden rule involved instantaneous returns. Now, however, we must rely on the wide range of providence, and believe that in the end it will prove wisest and best to have treated our neighbour as we would like to be treated ourselves. IIL IN CULTIVATING THE SPIBIT OF LOVE TOWARDS EVEN OUB ENEMIES, WE ARE BUT FOLLOWING THE FOOTSTEPS OF OUB FATHER IN BEAVEN. For while re-enforcing the courage of his people in rude ages by commanding retaliation, he was himself at the same time making his sun to shine on the evil and on the good, and sending rain upon the just and on the unjust (Matt. v. 45). He was not dealing with men after their sins, nor rewarding them according to their iniquities (Pa. ciii. 10). Not only in Nature, with its dignified refusal to be a respecter of persons, but also in his sacrificial worship, was God dealing with his enemies so as to make them his friends. He was pursuing even then the policy of overcoming evil by good (Rom. xii. 21). Such laws as retaliation, resting on inexorable justice, did something to check sin; but only love and goodness can overcome it. Hence the spirit of the old dispensation, while hostile to sin, as the outcome of a holy God must be, had an undertone of love and mercy. God, in fact, was practising all the time his own golden rule. He was doing by men what he wanted men to do by him. In some cases this succeeded, for this is the substance of the Divine appeal in the gospel of Christ, as it was the undertone of the preliminary law; in some cases it failed through the waywardness of men. Still, the golden rule is the spirit of the Divine administration, and will be till the present dis- pensation is finished. Then must the great Governor deal with the impenitent in the way of strictest justice, since they will not yield to his dying love. The rhythm of the aues will be maintained; if the wrath of man is not turned to praise by the exercise of lo~e, it must be restrained by the exercise of the cool and deliberate infliction of deserved wrath.-R. M. E. Vere. 10-23.-Shelomitli's ,on. Here a narrative ls introduced into the midst of a code of laws; but this is done as a preamble to enactments of whose publication tha case was the occasion. We notice- ! et Canon Mozley's 'Ruling Idou.s In Eu.rly Ages,' pp. 180-221. CB, XXIV, 10-23.] THE BOOK OF LEVITICUS. 389
Frederick Meyrick [1827-1906] • SECTION 423
The Pulpit Commentary — Leviticus — Section 423
← The Pulpit Commentary — Leviticus
Public domain historical Pulpit Commentary. Source page identifies the volume as Public Domain; text extracted from its historical PDF.