Vera. 1-3.-Self-respect in mourning. Mourning customs have significance, as testifying to the ideas of God, of human worth, and of immortality, held by those who practise them. Those here forbidden were degrading in their own nature, and em- bodied the false idea that God is pleased with the self-inflicted miseries of his creatures. They are condemned- I. .As DISHONOURING TO THE CREATOR. God, the Crea.tor of the body, cannot take delight in seeing it abused. This proposition seems self-evident. The idea. above referred to, and which lies at the root of so many false religions, viz. that it is pleasing to the Deity to see his creatures torturing and defacing themselves, is a libel on the Divine character. The body is rather to be reverenced as one of the noblest of God's works. It is to be studiously preserved and cared for. Religion, with reason, enjoins, "Do thyself no harm" (.Acts xvi. 28). II. .As INCONISISTENT WITH SELF·RESPECT. There is a propriety and decorum becoming in beings who possess reason. Wild and excessive grief, indicating the absence of power of self-control, lowers us beneath the dignity of rational existences. Neglect of the person, and, still more, wanton self-injury, in grief, betokens a like absence of proper self-respect. Least of all is such conduct excusable in those who claim the dignity of being God's children. They, of all others, ought to set an example of propriety and seemliness in behaviour. They are "an holy people," and must study to deport themselves worthily of their high calling. The priests of Baal (1 Kings xviii. 28) behaved like maniacs. Davicl aud Job behaved like religious men (2 Sam. :ill. 20; Job i. 20, 21). III. As IMPLYING THE AnSENCE OF RELIGIOUS CONSOLATIONS. 'fhe early Jews were not without these (Heh. xi. 13, 14). We in the Christian age have them still more abundantly. Therefore must we not sorrow "as those which have no hope" (1 Thess. iv. 13).-J. 0.
Vers. 3-21.-0lean and unclean. The distinction of clean and unclean appears to have rested- I. ON NATURAL GROUNDS. It is based to some extent on natural preferences and repugmmces-a.n index, often, to deeper correlations. We instinctively recognize 244 THE BOOK OF DEUTERONOMY. [oil, XIV, 1-29.