The Pulpit Commentary — Ecclesiastes — Section 231

under the rule of B tyrant; but it is for us to decide whether higher blessings than that of tranquillity are not to be striven for, The great cautiousness with which he speaks is not unreasonable when we remember how ready men are to make use of passages of Scripture to justify even questionable conduct, and how many errors have sprung from an ignorant and self-willed misinterpretation of isolated texts. The advice, then, given is" to keep the king's commandment" out of regard to the oath of allegiance taken to him or imposed by him. No hasty or ill-advised breach of such an oath is justifiable. It would seem that this passage was in St. Paul's mind, though he docs not directly quote from it, when he says, "Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience' sake" (Rom. xiii. 5). .As is well known, both the words of the Preacher, and the teaching of St. Paul in the thirteenth chapter of Romans, have been taken as laying down the rule of passive obedience for all subjects in all circumstances. However cruel the despot, the duty of subjects to obey him implicitly, and to make no attempt to deprive him of bis power, ha.s been held by many to be clearly laid down by the Word of God. . And great stress has been laid upon the fact that the ruler of the civilized world, when St. Paul wrote the Epistle to the Romans, was Nero, one of the most infamous and cruel tyrants who ever wore the purple. In our own country during the seventeenth century, when the question of the prerogative of the sovereign and the righls and duties of subjects engaged the attention of all, these portions of Scripture were often interpreted to teach that the king's will was by right, and by the authority of God's Word, above all charters and statutes and acts of parliament, and that no misuse of his power could justify rebellion against him. But those who took up this ground forgot or ignored the fact that kings have duties towards their subjects, that coronation oaths bind thelll to keep the laws; and that St. Paul, in the very same place in which he commands subjects to obey, describes the kind of rule which has an absolute claim upon their allegiance. "For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil .... Do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: for he is the minister of God to thee for good . . . a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil." It must surely be evident to all whose minds have not been blinded by a. grotesque and monstrous theory, that a ruler who isa terror to good worb, who rewards vice and punishes virtue, and uses the sword of justice to enforce his own selfish and cruel purposes, cannot claim from subjects the obedience which the apostle commands them to render to one of the very opposite character. But though passive obedience to tyrannical government cannot be commended on any higher ground than that of prudence, there can be no doubt that in ordinary circumstances the faithfulness of subjects to their rulers is a religious duty. .And so we find in many passages of Scripture blame attached to those who thought that rebellion against the authority even of heathen kings, to whom the chosen people might be in subjection, was justifiable (Isa. xxviii. 15; xxx. 1; Ezek. xvii. 15; Jer. xxvii. 12; cf. Matt. xxii. 21). If. A PRUDENT oou11sE. (Vers. 3, i, 5a.) In these verses the Preacher" seeks to dissuade his readers from casting off their allegiance to the king, or taking part with the enemies of the monarch under any hasty impulse whatever." "Do not lightly forsake the post of duty, join in no conspiracy against the king's throne or life," the words might bo paraphrased. His power is absolute; he is abuve courts of law, anJ. therefore any action against him must be attended with great risk. Of course, as I have said, the course recommended is a prudential one, and there are circumstances in which many will think that the oppressiveness of a tyrannical government bas reached a pitch justifying rebellion against it. But those who seek tranquillity will bear a great deal, and not be eager to enter on any such undertaking. In ordinary circum- stances, those who obey the king's commandment will experience no evil thing (5a), cases being left out of view in which the king requires obedience to decrees contrary to the Divine laws (Dan. iii., vi.); while tho risk of failure in attempts to overthrow his power, and the anarchy and crime that generally attentl insurrection against constitutetl authority, are calculated to make the wise man pause before he resolves to become a rebel. The advice given by tho Preacher is so carefully stated, and based on such reasonable grounds, that perhaps one should not term it servile. And this impression is atreng1hened by a consideration of what is implied rather than expressed in the latter re.rt of ver. 5. There is hope of a beueficial change even for those who submit in silence to tho worst evils of despotism. It is to be found in the conviction of thero  ECCLESIASTES; OR, THE PREACHER. [oiI. vin, 1-11. ----------------------------- being a power higher than that of earthly sovereign8, which will in its own time mete out punishment to all transgressors. 'l'he wise man's heart "discerneth both time and judgment;" he will wait patiently for the" time and sea.son of judgment which God hath put in his own power" (Lam. iii. 26; eh. iii. 1, 11, 17). Evil-doing cannot escap~ punishment; however exalted in ,tation the offender may be, the time will come round when his deeds will be ,,eighed in an unerring balance, and receive the chastisement they deserve. His high-handed disregard of equity and mercy may prevail up to a certain point, but retribution will come when the measure of his iniquity has been tilled up. And the knowledge that this is so will help to console and strengthen the wise in the dark and evil day.-J. W.