sow wheat and yet reap thorns. The contradiction is ouly on the surface; it suggests inquiry, and the further the inquiry is continued, the more it is seon what serious truth is contained in the prophet's statement. Consider, then, the statement in two aspects I. As SliOWING THAT MEN DO NOT REAP WHAT THEY RAVE BOWN. 'l'hey BOW wheat, It is surely not to a mere semblance of wheat-sowing that tho prophet here refers. It is true that men sow unconsciously the seeds of misery, of a bitter and shameful harvest, the gathering of which they cannot escape. It is true that the men who con• sult present pleasure and the present appearances of things are every day sowing evil seed, without having the least suspicion that they are sowing at all. It is even true that men may be so led away by errors of education, or habits received by mere tra• dition, as to go on all life through in what they suppose to be right, but which never- theless is utterly wrong. All this, however, is rather to he classed under the sowing of tares which are like wheat. The prophet is here dealing with the sowing of some- thing really good, and something capable of truly satisfactory results. The truth he would indicate is more fully set forth in our Lord's parable of the four different kinds of seed. The seed which the sower went forth to sow was all good seed. The seed ,1 hich fell in the good ground was not one whit better than what foll by the wayside. "\"f c see, therefore, that a large part of good seed is not reaped. Just according to the o.rea comprised by the terms " trodden ground," "stony ground," and " thorny ground," is I-here force in the statement that wheat bas been sown, and yet wheat not reaped. The prophet's reference is to the great, unquestionable, and peculiar privileges of farael. The Lord had not dealt with any nation as he had dealt with Israel. Other nation~ had found rising up amongst them men of genius and worldly wisdom and originating power ; but no other nation of antiquity shows in its history any man like a Moses, a i::lamnel, or a David, or even the very least of the prophets. We look upon Israel, therefore, as representative of all who have enjoyed abundance of religious privileges, of those whose early days have been in the midst of religious instructions and associations. Yet out of this very class the worldliest of the worldly have come. For all the truth that bas been bountifully sown not one stalk of result is to be seen. Mark that what i~ to be first noticed is the negation of good results. Is it not a sad thing that one should have to read first of all of so much Divine truth coming down from heaven, so many glorious revelations, so many angelic visits, so many inspired prophets and witnesses, and then, on the other hand, of so little manifest result in regenerated aml :µurifi.cd human lives? II. As SHOWING Tll.A.T MEN REAP WHAT THEY HAVE NOT SOWN. Thorns, of course, could not be reaped unless thorns were planted, but no one would deliberately plant thorns. That would be to say, at the very beginning of one's possibilities of choice, "E.il, be thou my good." But the heart of ruan, rich, deep, inexhaustible ground as it is, has come under a curse of which Gen. iii. 18 is but a shadowy suggestion. 'l'he vicious willingness of the ground to bring forth thorns and thistles every husbandman knows full well. Ch. iv. 3 needs to be borne in mind: "Sow not among thorns." Men shrink from the toil anu suffering needful to uproot the false and the injurious, and still more difficult do they find the watchfulness and determination which would pre• vent thorns from getting hold at all; and yet it is perfectly certain that thorns, allowed to continue, will in time destroy anything like abiding fruit from the good seed. Note the important difference between the tares and the thorns. The wheat and tho tares gruw together till the harvest; then the tares are easily separated and burnt. 'l'he perfected wheat is as easily separated and garnered. Dut the thorns choke the wheat, all<l there is never any real gathering at all. Wheat that does not reach maturity is worth nothing as wheat. It cannot be put into the garner. Hence the keeping down uf the thorns is every whit as important as the puslling forward of the wheat. If tha n(;gative conditions are neglected, the positive conditions are nullified. Israel was now, as we see, sunk in the filthiest abominations of idolatry. But it bad come to this through a luu;.,,; ueglect of the most earnest warnings. Note in particular Numb. xx:xiii. 55, "II ye will uot drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come tu pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, nnd thorn~ iu your sides." The idolatry of Israel was a far worse thing than the idolatry of tho h"!lthen; just as a neglected garden overrun with weeds and briars is worse than a weedy and briery corner of the wilderness (Lev. xx:vi. 16; Deut, x:x:viii. 38-40; Micah vi.15; Ha~. i.6).-Y. err. xm. 1-27.] THE BOOK OF THE PROPHET JEREMIAH. 33,3
Thomas Kelly Cheyne [1841-1915] • SECTION 332
The Pulpit Commentary — Jeremiah — Volume 1 — Section 332
← The Pulpit Commentary — Jeremiah — Volume 1
Public domain historical Pulpit Commentary. Source page identifies the volume as Public Domain; text extracted from its historical PDF.