Ver. 5.-.Are we better than our fathers~ I. "FATHERS" Il\lPLIES BUCOESSIVENESS. Changes are constant. Not a whole generation together, but men go, as they come, one by one. Seems common to all existences. Necessary also. If all lived on, there would not be room for the ever-increasing multitudes. Part of God's great plan for the education of the race. II. "FATHERS" IlllPLIES INTEBDEPENDENOE. There is a close relationship between fathers and children. Physically, mentally, and even morally, we are to a large degree what others have made us. " How shall a man escape from his ancestors, or draw off from his veins the black drop which he drew from his father's or his mother's life?" (Emerson). "''Tis law as steadfast as the throne of Ze11B, Our days are heritors of days gone by." (1Eschylus.) And as we have been influenced by the past, so we shall influence the future. Our children not only receive a certain impress from their birth, but are moulded for good or evil by the teaching and example of their parents, and by the environment of their ~~~ I IIL " F ATHEBS" DIJ'LIEB RESPONSIBILITY. "Be not as your fathers." There should be reflection and choice of the good. Whether we are better or worse is a difficult question. The term "fathers" is indefinite. We should fix some point for comparison. But where? Our immediate fathers, or those of earlier times ? Besides, difficult to get evidence for a fair comparison. History defective. Tradition unreliable. The "fathers " stand out like hills enshrouded in mist, or as stars that take a glory from being far. Besides, who are to judge? Ourselves. Then risk of partiality. We naturally lean to the party to which we belong. Suppose you take the old. They are apt to side with the past. Their day is over. Their vigour is gone. They dwell on what has been done. Rarely will you find an old man who does not say, "The former days were better" (Eccles. vii. 10). Suppose you take the young. They side with the present. 'I'he world is all before them. 'fhey are eager for the strife. "Yearning for the large excitement that the coming years would yield." But in auy case, our judgment is lia,ble to be affected by circumstances. Our own state, the love of society, the spirit of the age, influence us largely (cf. Elijah, 1 Kings xix. 4). Are we "better than our fathers 1 There is no question but we ought to be. Progress is the law. We have the higher advantages. The great thoughts and the great deeds of others should inspire us. We are the "heirs of all the ages." Jn some respects we are certainly better. As to food, clothing, habitations, means of education, political and social rights, intercourse with other nations, and so forth, there has been an immense advance. But what availeth this, if morally and spiritually we stand, not higher, but lower than our fathers? "Christ is our Hope." Individually we are bound to strive afLer a better life, and thus we can best influence society. There may be much in our past that is bad; but it is past; and let us take hope. If there are sins, they are forgiven. If there are bad habits, they have been broken off. If there OR, t. 1-21.] THE BOOK OF ZECHARIAH. 11
nre failures, they he.ve been retrieved. We can look on. Stirred with a holy ambition, eustnined by precious promises, animated by noble examples, we can press on to the brighter nnd better days to come. Our standard should be, not the conventional stnndo.rd of the Church or the day, but the perfect law of Christ (Matt. v. 20-48).-F.