The Pulpit Commentary — Mark — Volume 1 — Section 346

HOMILIES BY VARIOUS AUTHORS. Vera. 1-15.-(Cf. on eh. vi. 32-41.)-M. Vers. 11-13.-Seelcing for a sign. Christ knew at once what this meant. He "knew what was in man," and refused to comwit himself to the pretended inquirer~- We have a more difficult course to pursue. I. THE CHARACTER OF THE DEMAND DEPENDS UPON CIROUMSTANCES. It may be made in an honest, inquiring spirit, or in order to injure religion. In the former case too much consideration can hardly be given to it, as it is the indispensable preliminary to rational conviction, and the gospel offers evidence for its claims, 'l'he spi1it in which the inquiry is made may be determined by: 1. The character of those who inqui-re. Bad men may be genuine inquirers, but it is well to know their antecedents. Christ could read the underlying design of the Jews. It may reasonably be expected that inquirers should give some proof of their sincerity, especially if already furnished with mauy evidences. 2. 'l'he kind of sign asked fur. Here it was "a sign from heaven," i.e. differing from the miracles and previous manifestations of Christ. This implied that they were insufficient, and indirectly pronounced judgment upon the previous words and works of Christ. A question may sometimes reveal a. more thorough scepticism than a dogmatic denial. Whilst apparent liberty is given as to what particular sign might be produced, there is really a tone of dictation and unseemly assumption. II. SucH A DEMAND EXPOSES THE REPRESENTATIVES OF CHRISTIANITY TO STRONG TEMPTATION. They are invited to critici.ze God's methods of revelation, and to despise the "means of grace." A position full of unbelief and presumption may insensibly be assumed, such as that of Moses at the rock: "Must we fetch you water out of this rock?" (Numb. xx. 10). 'l'hey may be induced to attempt to "force the hand" of God. The crime of such a proceeding could only be equalled by its folly. A.s if those who are insensible to the cross of Christ could be converted by a. thunderbolt or a merely supernatural spectacle I It is for Christ's servants in times of popular excite- ment to preach the old truths, and to appeal to every man's conscience in the sight of God. The improbability of sensationalism producing belief is a grow-ing one. "If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, if one rise from the dead" (Luke xvi. 31). So we may now add, "If they believe not One who has Jisen from the dead, neither will they believe, though he were to be manifested to them in heaven itself," IIL EVEN WERE IT DESIBED IT W0tJLD BE REFUSED. "This generation" represents all who ask in a similar spirit, 1. Because th• evidence for Christianity is spiritual, not carnal; moral, and nut material. 2. Because the patent, outstanding facts of the gospel are sufficient: (1) For the conversion of sinners; and (2) for the confirmation and edifying of saints. 3. Because it is part of the punishment appointed to such inquirers that they shall ask and not receive, and seek and not find. 4. Because it may become a means <if turning attention back to the ev-idence that has been despised or ignored. It is high time our philosophical inquirers began to inquire why their researches have produced no fruits in evidence or conviction as yet, Why is it that whilst t.he evidence for the gospel is at least equal to that for any other matters of history, it is yet disbelieved when they are accepted? Is not the reason a moral rnthei than an intellectual one ?-M. 3.J.4 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST, MARK. [cu. vw. 1-3&