The Pulpit Commentary — Acts — Volume 1 — Section 216

also needs the entire devotion of men's time and talents and influence. If apostles needed to step aside from common cares to keep their efficiency for spiritual work, much more do the modem clergy in this busy and anxious age, It should seriously be considered how far the modern ministry has_ become weakened, especially in spiritual power and prophet_-like eneri(y, by becoming cro:"ded with worldly cares, so that private soul-culture 1s neglected and prayer-preparations are crowded out. Only from the "secret place of the Most High" can Christian teachers come forth in power. "While they are musing the fire bums;" and then they can "speak with their tongues."-R, T. Vers. 5-8.-Stephen, the protr>-martyr. Very little is known of his history. Anrl, except for the sake of introducing Saul of Tarsllll, and indicating the influence that Stephen's teachings and martyrdom exerted upon him, it is difficult for us to trace why the brief record of his work and death are preserved for us by St. Luke. We judge that he was a Hellenist, by his name ; but it is not known from what country he came. He is represented by Epiphanius as one of the seventy disciples chosen by Christ. Others think that he was one of St. Peter's converts on the day of Pentecost. Dr. Dykes fixes on the point most demanding our attention when he says, "The elevation of Stephen to official rank bad this for one of its results, that the spiritual and intellectual gifts with which God had endowed this man found at once a wider and more public sphere. Stephen was more than an almoner. He was a deep student of the Old Testament, a theologian of unusual insight, a powerful reasoner and an advanced Christian. In him, too, we find that promise fulfilled which had hitherto been fulfilled to Peter, the promise of such wisdom in speech as no adversary could gainsay. His manner of speech, however, was unlike that of Peter. Peter was a witness, and preached by witness-bearing. Stephen was a student, and preached by exposition and controversy." We dwell on the mission of Stephen as suggested by the terms of the above passages. I. HE WAS A MAN OF FAITH. It is twice noticed that he was "full of faith "-an expression which may be taken to mean: 1. That he was unusually open and receptive to the Christian truth and grace; for some manuscripts read, "full of grace." 2. Or that he was unusually zealous and active in proclaiming Christ. Faith is sometimes the equivalent of piety, sometimes of activity. The man of faith is, from one point of view, the man of piety; from another point of view he is the man of activity, ,;vho readily overcomes hindrances, and, relying on Divine help, goes on in his work, con- secrating himself wholly to it. Faith is too often thought of as a cherished sentiment; it is for Christians the inspiration of practical life and duty. They should be earnest in service, and find the earnestness maintained by their trust. Faith evidently kept very near to Stephen the vision of the exalted and living Christ. 11. STEPHEN AB A MAN OF POWER. This was shown in (1) the influence of his personal character ; (2) in his indomitable energy and perseverance; (3) in his stores of scriptural knowledge; (4) in his intellectual gifts; (5) in his unanswerable argu- ments; (6) in his ability to add miraculous attestations. Men could not resist the " wisdom and the Spirit by which he spake." III. STEPHEN AS A MAN MOVED BY THE HoLY GHOST. Not simply endowed with intellectual gifts, but under special constrainings of the Holy Ghost; called to a special work, and suitably enriched and inspired for that work. Where there h1 a full conse- cration or heart, and an entire openness of life, there the Holy Spirit will come, making the man his agent, and assuring to bis labours full success. IV. STEPHEN AB A MAN BEFORE RIB TIME. Only gradually did the true relations between Judaism and Christianity dawn upon the apostles. But Stephen saw them, and boldly announced them, putting them on men's thoughts, if he might not win for them a present acceptance. Perhaps, as a Hellenist, he had not so great prejudices to overcome as had the Palestinian Jews. Stephen paid the penalty which usually comes to those whose thoughts and teachings are in advance of their age. His enemies were quite right. From their point of view he was a most dangerons man-no one of the Christian band was so dangerous. But he was one of the noblest of men. He is a. sublime example. His brief life is an abiding witness. Bei~ dead, he speaks with a martyr's voice, bidding us do noble things for Cbriat, and trust him to give ua strength for the doing.-R. T.  211 TBB AOTB or THE APOSTLES. [on. VL 1-11s.