Real circumstances alone could account for the devotion of a considerable portion of this document to such a theme as i8 here treated. 'l'he solicitude and indignation of the apostle are highly characteristic ; whilst the insight afforded into the moral -state of the Corinthian congregation is obviously one which only unmistakable facts can justify and explain. Moral lessons of high value may be deduced from the .apostle's treatment of a distressing subject. I. WE OBSERVE THE DEBASED MORAL SENTIMENTS AND PRACTICES WITH WHICH -CHRISTIANITY HAD 'l'O CONTEND. we need not go to the moralists, the satirists, the poets of classical literature, in order to form a judgment as to the corruptions which J>revailed among the nations previously to the promulgation of Christianity. The Ne1v Testament,· especially St. Paul's writings, are a sufficient witness. We have the opportunity of learning, through our travellers and missionaries, how largely the state of the heathen world at the present time corresponds with that of pre-Christian ;paganism. 1. 'l'he passage before us furnishes an example of fornication, which was scarcely thought to be a vice, and indeed was a religious observance among the voluptuous society of Corinth. 2. But the case was one of aggravated adultery and incest, which the moralists of antiquity admitted to be crimes, but which it surprises us to find, even in an individual case, in one of the early Christian communities. £uch, however, was the moral condition for which our Divine religion brought a remedy. IJ. WE REMARK THE LAXITY ON THE PART OF A CHRISTIAN COMMIP-ilTY WHICH COULD TOLERATE BUCH OFFENCES AGAINST MORALITY. 1. The Church at Corinth allowed the offender to remain unreproved in their midst, as though nothing had happened which called for especial notice and vigorous and immediate action. 2. They did not even mourn, did not distress themselves, did not make the event an occasion of humiliation ai;d mourning; which showed a sad insensibility to the evil. 3. So far from this, at the very time when their fellowship was so disgraced, they were "puffed up," boasting themselves of their spiritual gifts and intellectual distinction I Ill. WE GRATEFULLY NOTE THE PROTEST OF THE INSPIRED APOSTLE AGAINST THE CONDUCT BOTH OF THE OFFENDER AND OF THOSE WHO TOLERATED HIM. It may occur to svme readers of the Epistle to ask-Is not the very fact that such sin existed and was suffered in the bosom of a Christian society 11. proof that Christianity had little real, moral, beneficent power in the world? Wherein was this Church at Corinth better than any heathen society? Could a worse state of things exist without than that which admittedly existed within? The answer to this objection is obvious and sufficient, and is very instructive to us. 1. The conduct or the offender was in direct violation of the laws upon which the society to which he nominally belonged \Vas built. Purity was, as much as justice or benevolence, a fundamental law of the Christian kingdom. 2. This conduct was also in flagrant contrast and antagonism to the spirit and life of the Divine Founder or that religion which was professedly received by these Cori[lthio.n Christians. Jes\18 was the model of pu1ity of heart, and his life and character were sinless, holy, blameless. 3. The inaction and tolerance which were blamable in the congregation were inconsistent with their well-known duty. 'fhe Christian Church is not a club, whose members are at liberty to receive and reject whomsocnr they choose. It is a society of which Christ is the Head and Lord, and is bound to receive those who possess his Spirit, and to reject those who openly and unmistakably grieve and outrage that Spirit. The members of the Church were termed "the holy," or "~ints;" ao<l although all were and still are in character far short of the designation they bear, there can be no question as to the inconsistency of a life of incest with a Christian profession. 4. '.Ilhe case called for the stern interference of the apostle, as an authority over the Churches. His language was intended to quicken the conscience, to enlighten the judgment, to call forth the action, of those who were very negligent and culpable. It was a new thing in heathendom that such a stand should be made as that which was on this occasion made by the apostle of the Gentiles. 5. Further, the action or the Church, when brought to a proper state of mind, was such as to show that one great end of the existence of Christian societies was the promotion of moral purity. The excision of the members was necessary to the preservation of the health of the body. 6. The ultimate repentance and restoratio[l of the offender is a proof to us that the ,Christian Church was designed to promote, not only the purity of the pure, but the 176 THE FIRST EPISTLE 'l'O THE COHINTHIANS. [cu. v. 1-13.
recovery of the lapsed. In this the Church showed herself to be penetrated wit!~ the compassionate Spirit of her Divine Master and Head.-T.