I. THe TRIBUNAL. Jesus bas already been led before the crafty and unrighteous Annas. He is now led into the presence of the high priest, the Caiaphas (son-in-law to Annas) who has declared that it was good that one man should perish for the people; which meant, that it was better that the innocent Jesus should die, rather than that the ruler’s influence with the people shculd be imperilled by the prevalence of the spirituai teaching of the Prophet of Nazareth. With Caiaphas are associated, first informally, and then in something like legal fashion, the chief priests, elders, and scribes. It appears that these are mainly of the Sadducees, of the party who aimed at political power. The tribunal before which Jesus is arraigned is composed of the Sanhedrim, so far as it may be said to exist at this time. It is observable, accordingly, that the accusers of Jesus are his judges. These are the men who sent down spies into Galilee, to lay in wait and tempt Jesus, and catch him in his speech. ‘These are the men whe instigated the cavillers who, in the public places of Jerusalem, opposed the teaching of the Lord with foolish questions, uncandid criticisms, unfounded calumnies. These are the men who, after the raising of Lazarus, plotted against the mighty One, and resolved that they would have his life. These are the men who themselves sent out the band that apprehended Jesus in the garden. He appears, therefore, at the bar of those who have watched and pursued him with eager malice, who have persecuted him with unscrupulous hatred, and who have now got him within their toils. Such was the court before which Jesus appeared. From a tribunal like this there was no prospect, no
248 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MARK. [ex. xrv. 1—72.
expectation, no possibility, of justice. This Jesus had long foreseen, and for the conse- quences Jesus was perfectly prepared.
Il. Tue eviwence. When the judges condescend to become the accusers, it is no wonder that they seek evidence against the accused. In such circumstances Jesus must be obviously, undeniably innocent, if no charge can be substantiated against him. False witnesses appear; but so flagrantly inconsistent are their unfounded accusations, that even such a court, so prejudiced, cannot condemn upon testimony so mutually destructive. At length, however, false witnesses stand up, who distort a memorable saying of Christ into what may be construed as a disparagement of the national temple which all Jews regard with pride. Jesus, speaking of the temple of his body, had said, “‘ Destroy this temple, and in three days I will rear it again.” This saying is misrepresented, and made to appear the utterance of an intention to destroy the sacred and noble edifice. Even so, however, the witnesses agree nat. If this is the worst charge that can be brought against Jesus, and if even this cannot be substantiated ; if no remembered words can be twisted so as to give some colour for condemnation before a tribunal so constituted and so prejudiced; then this is certain, that the ministry of Jesus must have been discharged with amazing wisdom and discretion. At the same time, the sin of the Lord’s enemies appears the more enormous and the more inexcusable. Jesus was not condemned upon any evidence, any testimony, against him.
III. THe APPEAL AND ADJURATION. 1. The president of the court, stung with dis- appointment, springs from his seat, indignant at the silence and calmness of the accused ; and, with most unjudicial unfairness, interposes, and endeavours to provoke Jesus inte language which may inculpate himself. But he is met with a dignified demeanour and with continued silence. 2. This effort being in vain, the high priest adjures the accused, and requires him to say whether or not he persists in the claims which he has made in the course of his ministry to be the Messiah, and the Son of the Blessed. Let him say “‘ No,” and he is for ever discredited and powerless; let him say “ Yes,” and then his admission may be construed into a claim which may be represented to the Roman procurator as a treasonable assumption of royal power. The intention of the judge in this proceeding was evil; but an opportunity was thus given for the great Accused publicly to put himself right with the court and with the world.
IV. THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND DECLARATION. Our Lord does not think it worth while to refute witnesses who have refuted themselves and one another. But now that the ruler of the people puts him upon his oath, and requires of him a plain answer to a plain question, Jesus breaks his silence. 1. He acknowledges what he has often asserted before, that no claim can be too high for him to make with truth. If he is to die— and upon that he has resolved—Jesus will die, witnessing to the truth and for the truth. He is the foretold Deliverer, the anointed King, the only Son of the Blessed and Eternal. ‘This he will not conceal; from this avowal nought shall make him shrink. 2. He adds that his high position and glorious office shall be one day witnessed by his persecutors and judges, as well as by all mankind. There ig true sublimity in such an avowal, made in such circumstances and before such an assembly. To the view of man Jesus is the culprit, powerless before the malice and the injustice of the mighty, and in danger of a cruel and violent death. But in truth the case is otherwise. He is the Divine King, the Divine Judge. His glory is concealed now, but it shall shine forth in due time and ere long. Men on earth shall bow in his Name, receive his laws, and place themselves beneath his protecting care. The world shall witness his majesty, and all nations shall be summoned to his bar, and heaven shall crown him “ Lord of all.” What striking harmony there is between this profession and expectation of Christ on the one hand, and on the other that wonderful statement of an apostle, ‘“ For the joy that was set be.ore him, he endured the cross, despising the shame ”
V. THE SENTENCE. 1, The avowal is treated as a confession. No witnesses are now needed. From his own mouth he is judged. The charge, which Jesus’ own language is held to justify and substantiate, is one of blasphemy. And, if Christ were a mere man, this charge was just. 2, The whole court concurs in the judgment. The president is eager to condemn, but not more eager than his assessors. One mind moves them all— a mind of malice and hatred, a mind rejoicing in iniquity, grasping at the fulfilment of base hopes. 3, The sentence is death. It was a foregone conclusion. The destruc- tion of Jesus had beer resolved upon long since, Death for the Lord of life; death for
OH. xIv. 1—72.] THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST, MARK. 249
the Benefactor of mankind; death for the innocent but willing Victim of human ferocity and human sin ! ,