Vers. 22-—~-24.—The Lord's Supper. The Lord’s Supper was the natural outgrowth of the Passover. The broken bread, which was made @ symbol of our Lord’s broken body, had been seen and partaken of for generations by the Jews, who had regarded it as “the bread of affliction” which their fathers once ate in Egypt. “The cup of blessing,” transformed into “ the communion of the blood of Christ,” was the third cup in the feast, which followed on the distribution of the Paschal lamb, and preceded the singing of the Hallel. The whole Passover was a symbolical festival of remembrance, and this we believe the Lord’s Supper was intended to be. It was not to be a repeated sacrifice; as Gregory the Great was the first to suggest, but was a feast to be eaten in remembrance of the Saviour. No symbols could be more appropriate. The bread represented the Bread of life; the broken bread that it was broken for us. The wine was “the blood of the grape” (Gen. xlix. 11), poured out from the true Vine (John xv. 1), which was its Source. The expression, “ This is my body,” surely could not have been taken in any literal sense by the disciples, who had their Lord in his physical presence visible amongst them when he spoke. It was equivalent to “This represents my body ; ” just as elsewhere we read, “The field és the world; ” “Iam the true Vine;” “Leaven ... which is hypocrisy” (see also Gal. iv. 24; Heb. x. 20). What, then, are some of the advantages of this commemorative feast ?
L. It REPRESENTS THE PROPITIATORY CHARACTER OF CHRIST'S DEATH. His blood was shed for many, for the remission of sins. His death was not merely a martyrdom; it was an atonement. He gave his life for the sheep. The prophets foretold this (Iss. liii.) ; the apostles declared it (Rom. v.); the redeemed praise the Lamb who was alain, because he washed them from their sins in his own blood.
IL Ir REMINDS US OF THH NECESSITY FOR PERSONALLY PARTAKING OF Curist. “ Take, eat: this is my body.” What we eat and drink becomes a part of ourselves. Once our Lord said, “ Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.” Food is useless unless we partake of it. Christ came to us in vain unless we trust him as our own Saviour and Lord.
Ti, Iv 1s oN rvsELF A MEANS OF GRACE. This is to be proved in experience rather than by Scripture. Just as a word which we can see or hear conveys a thought which we cannot see or hear, so the bread and the wine convey thoughts of Christ, of his sacrifice, of his claims, of his love, which refresh and strengthen our inmosi life.
IV. Ir 18 A PROCLAMATION OF FELLOWSHIP. 1 Cor. x. 16, etc, “For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread.” A ** communion ” is that of whieh we are common partakers, and St. Paul argues that by eating and drinking together thus we proclaim our unity; just as the Israelites in Egypt, on the night of the Exodus, met in families, each finding its centre of thought and safety in the Paschal lamb. It is the idea of the family, and not of the priesthood, that God makes the germ of the Christian Church. Those in it are to “ bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfil the Law of Christ.” By the extension of the Church will come about the true brotherhood, for which the world still sighs.
V. Iv is A PLEDGE OF FipELiTy. The “sacramentum” was the oath taken by the Roman soldier that he would never desert the standard, never turn his back on the foe, and never be disloyal to his commander. By our presence at the sacrament we pledge each other, before God, that with his help we will be true men, more courageous, more pure, more victorious, than before.
VI. Ir 1s 4 SIGN OF SEPARATION. The Egyptians had no part in the Passover. The scribes and Pharisees were not invited to the upper room. Judas, so far as we can judge, left before the new rite wis instituted. St. Paul spoke of the duty devolving on the Church at Corinth to remove the immoral from fellowship. Yet all true disciples, though they may doubt as Thomas did, or deny their Lord like Peter, are invited to eat and drink with each other, and with their Lord.—A. RB.
Vers. 32—35.—Gethsemane. The Mediator between God and mar, experienced all the vicissitudes of human life. From the loftiest height of joy he plunged into the deepest depths of distress. Because of the fulness of his nature he surpassed us in these
262 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MARK. [ca. xiv. 1—72.
X a
experiences, alike in the glory of the Transfiguration and in the agony of Gethsemane. Therefore we are never beyond the range of his sympathy. Weare all familiar with the outward circumstances of this incident, but the wisest of us knows but little of the depths of its mystery. Indeed, although our interest in the scene is intense, although we feel it is fraught with the destiny of our race, we shrink with hesitation from speak- ing much of it. A sense of intrusiveness overpowers those who are conscious of ignor- ance and sin, when they would gaze on that sinless agony of grief. It seems as if our Lord still said to his disciples, “ Sit ye here, while I shall pray.” The place whereon we stand is holy ground,