A Brighter Day Begins with His Word.

History of the Christian Church • VOLUME 2

[413] Apol. I. 66 (I. 182, third ed. of Otto). Here also occurs already the term metabole', which some Roman controversialists use at once as an argument for transubstant

Schaff, Philip (1819-1893) • Public Domain (CCEL text metadata)

[413] Apol. I. 66 (I. 182, third ed. of Otto). Here also occurs already the term metabole', which some Roman controversialists use at once as an argument for transubstantiation. Justin says: Ex hes (i.e.trophes) haima kai sarkes kata metabolen trephontai hemon, ex quo alimento sanguis et carnes nostae per mutationem aluntur. But according to the context, this denotes by no means a transmutation of the elements, but either the assimilation of them to the body of the receiver, or the operation of them upon the body, with reference to the future resurrection. Comp. John 6:54 sqq., and like passages in Ignatius and Irenaeus.

[414] Adv. haer. IV. 18, and passim.

[415] In the second of the Fragments discovered by Pfaff (Opp. Tren. ed Stieren, vol. I. p. 855), which Maffei and other Roman divines have unwarrantably declared spurious. It is there said that the Christians, after the offering of the eucharistic sacrifice, call upon the Holy Ghost, hopos apophene ten thusian tauten kai ton arton soma tou Christou, kai to poterion to haima tou Chr., hina oi metalabontes touton ton antitupon, tes apheseos ton hamartion kai zoes aioniou tuchosin.

[416] 1 Pet. 3:20, 21.

[417] Const. Apost. l. V. c. 14 Ta antitupa musteria tou timiou somatos autou kai haimatos. So VI. 30, and in a eucharistic prayer, VII. 25. Other passages of the Greek fathers see in Stieren, l.c. p. 884 sq. Comp. also Bleek's learned remarks in his large Com. on Heb. 8:5, and 9:24.

[418] Adv. Marc. IV. 40; and likewise III. 19. This interpretation is plainly very near that of OEcolampadius, who puts the figure in the predicate, and who attached no small weight to Tertullian's authority. But the Zwinglian view, which puts the figure in theesti. instead of the predicate, appears also in Tertullian, Adv. Marc. I. 14, in the words: "Panem qui ipsum corpus suum repraesentat." The two interpretations are only grammatical modifications of the same symbolical theory.

[419] De Resur. Carnis, c. 8."Caro corpore et sanguine Christi vescitur, ut et anima de Deo saginetur." De Pudic. c. 9, he refers the fatted calf, in the parable of the prodigal son, to the Lord's Supper, and says: "Opimitate Dominici corporis vescitur, eucharistia scilicet."De Orat. c. 6: "Quod et corpus Christi in pane censetur," which should probably be translated: is to be understood by the bread (not contained in the bread).

[420] For this reason he considers the mixing essential. Epist. 63 (ed. Bal.) c. 13: "Si vinum tantum quis offerat, sanguis Christi incipit esse sine nobis; si vero aqua sit sola, plebs incipit esse sine Christo. Quando autem utrumque miscetur et adunatione confusa sibi invicem copitlatur, tunc sacramentum spirituale et cOEleste perficitur."

[421] Comment. ser. in Matt. c. 85 (III. 898): "Panis iste, quem Dem Verbum [Logos] corpus suum esse fatetur, verbum est nutritorium animarum, verbum de Deo Verbo procedens, et panis de pani cOElesti ... Non enim panem illum visibilem, quem tenebat in manibus, corpus situm dicebat Deus Verbum, sed verbum, in cuius mysterio est panis ille frangendus." Then the same of the wine. Origen evidently goes no higher than the Zwinglian theory, while Clement approaches the Calvinistic view of a spiritual real fruition of Christ's life in the Eucharist.

[422] Prosphora, thusia, oblatio, sacrificium.

[423] So among the Jews the cup of wine at the paschal supper was called "the cup of blessing,"poterion eulogias =eucharistias , Comp. 1 Cor. 10:16.

[424] Adv. Haer. IV. c. 18, §. 4: "Verbum [the Logos] quod offertur Deo;" instead of which should be read, according to other manuscripts: "Verbum per quod offertur,"--which suits the connexion much better. Comp. IV. 17, § 6: "Per Jes. Christum offert ecclesia." Stieren reads "Verbum quod," but refers it not to Christ, but to the word of the prayer. The passage is, at all events, too obscure and too isolated to build a dogma upon.

[425] Epist. 63 ad Council. c. 14: "Si Jesus Christus, Dominus et Deus noster, ipse est summus sacerdos Dei Patris et sacrificium Patri seipsum primus obtulit et hoc fieri in sui commemorationem praecepit: utique ille sacerdos vice Christi vere fungitur, gui id, quod Christus fecit, imitatur et sacrificium verum et plenum tunc offert."

Historical source record →