THE NEW SCHAFF-HERZOG 54
closer definition was left to theology. Henceforth, the doctrine was a factor in the kenotic controversies (see Knnosis; Curisronoay). Like Chemnitz and Hunnius, the Giessen theologians taught, beside potential possession, the “ kenosis of the use
of the divine properties on the part of the /humanity and the “ immanent presence,” in Christ’s humiliation, thus reserving the omnipresence of his humanity for his exaltation. The Tiibingen theologians, on the other hand, logically maintaining the communicatio idiomatum even during the humiliation, granted merely a ‘‘ concealment of the use ” of the divine properties, asserting also for the humanity in the state of humiliation an omnipresence merely dissimulated. A ‘‘ kenosis of function ”’ is conceded only of the high-priestly functions of Jesus with reference to omnipotence. Thus, however, the humanity of Christ was imperiled. These two types continued to exist side by side, in modified forms, for Lutheran theology, with the former generally in the ascendancy. The rise of Pietism and rationalism retired Christological speculation to the background, and the Lutheran theology of the nineteenth century had scant interest in ubiquity.
A. W. HunzincEr.
BrstiogRAPHY: The subject is to be pursued in the his-
tories of doctrine, such as Harnack, Dogma, vi. 239, vii.
243, 262 sqq.; F. A. Loofs, Halle, 1908; and .R. Seeberg,
2d ed., Leipsic, 1908; in the works on the history of Prot-
estant theology, such as W. Gass, 4 vols., Berlin, 1854—
1867; and G. W. Frank, 4 vols., Leipsic, 1862-1905; in
the works on systematic theology, e.g., C. Hodge, ii. 408
saq., iii. 670 sqq., 3 vols., New York, 1871-72; and W. G.
T. Shedd, ii. 323-327, New York, 1889; and in those on
Christology, e.g., I. A. Dorner, Person Christi, vol. ii.,
Berlin, 1854, Eng. transl., vol. iv., 5 vols., Edinburgh,
1861-63. Recourse should be had also to the articles
mentioned in the text and the literature under them, such
as CHRISTOLOGY; HucHARIST; TRANSUBSTANTIATION;
and the like; under Lorp’s Supper to the works by J.
H. A. Ebrard, Frankfort, 1845-46; K. F. A. Kahnis,
Leipsic, 1851; A. W. Dieckhoff, Géttingen, 1854; and
H. Schmid, Leipsic, 1868. Consult further: F. C. Baur,
Die Lehre von der Dreieinigkeit und Menschwerdung Gottes,
vol. iii., Tiibingen, 1843; M. Schneckenburger, Zur kirch-
lichen Christologie, Pforzheim, 1848; idem, Darstellung des
lutherischen und reformirten Lehrbegriffs, Stuttgart, 1855;
H. Heppe, Geschichte der deutschen Protestanten .. .
1655-81, 4 vols., Marburg, 1855-59; A. Schweizer, Die
protestantischen Centraldogmen in threr Entwickelung in
der reformirten Kirche, 2 vols., Zurich, 1854-56; F. H. R.
Frank, Theologie der Concordienformel, 4 parts, Erlangen,
1858-64; G. Plitt, Hinleitung in die Augustana, 2 parts,
Erlangen, 1867-68; R. D. Hitchcock, in Journal of Chris-
tian Philosophy, ii (1883), 381 sqq.; K. G. Gétz, Die
Abendmahlsfrage in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwickelung,
Leipsic, 1904; J. Késtlin, Luthers Theologie, 2d ed., 2
vols., Stuttgart, 1902; T. M. Lindsay, Hist. of the Refor-
mation, pp. 4, 7, 57, 412-413, New York, 1907; Schaff,
Christian Church, vi. 625-626, 628.
UDALL (UVEDALE), JOHN: Puritan; b. about 1560; d. in London toward the end of 1592. He studied at Christ’s and Trinity Colleges, Cambridge (B.A., 1581; M.A., 1584); was presented to the living of Kingston-on-Thames before 1584, of which he was deprived in 1588 for bold and offensive preaching of Puritan doctrine, and issued three volumes of sermons, Amendment of Life, Obedience to the Gospell, and Peter’s Fall (Kingston, 1584). A fourth volume, The True Remedie against Famine and Warres, appeared 1586. He was a friend of John Penry (q.v.) and gave him certain information which was used in the first Marprelate tract. Inde-
pendently he wrote The State of the Church of Englande Laide Open in a Conference (generally known as ‘ The Dialogue ” from its form) and A Demonstration of the Trueth of that Discipline which Christ hath Prescribed . . . for the Government of his Church, both printed by Penry’s printer, Robert Waldegrave, in 1588 (reprinted by Edward Arber, The
English Scholar’s Library, nos. 5 and 9, London,
1879, 1880).. He was suspected of complicity in the
Marprelate tracts (q.v.) and summoned to London
for examination, Dec., 1589; in July, 1590, he was
brought to trial, charged with publishing ‘‘ a wicked, scandalous, and seditious libel’ (the Demonstration); was found guilty, and sentenced to death, but no desire was manifested to execute the sentence; in June, 1592, on the intercession of influential friends, he was pardoned by Queen Elizabeth.
He was a good Hebrew scholar and translated
from Latin into English the Hebrew grammar of
Peter Martinius (Paris, 1567), adding exercises and
a dictionary (The Key of the Holy Tongue, Ley-
den, 1593), and wrote a commentary on Lamenta-
tions (London, 1595).
BrsiioGRaPpHy: A New Discovery of Old Pontifical Practises for the Maintenance of the Prelates Authority and Hierarchy . . . , London, 1643; W. Maskell, Hist. of the Marprelate Controversy, London, 1845; C. H. and T. Cooper, Athene Cantabrigienses, ii. 148-150, London, 1861; E. Arber, An Introductory Sketch to the Martin Marprelate Controversy, London, 1879; DNB, lviii. 4-6; and the introductions to the reprints named in the text. UGOLINI, a’go-li’ni, BIAGIO (BLASIUS UGO-
LINUS): Italian Roman Catholic Christian antiqua-
rian; flourished in the eighteenth century. Of his life
nothing is known, but there is little doubt that he
was a Jew by birth. In an open letter to C. B.
Michaelis (Venice, 1748) he mentions the fact that
he frequently associated at Venice with J. E. I.
Walch (b. 1725) and his brother, C. W. F. Walch
(b. 1726), and likewise requests Michaelis to give
his greetings to the Halle professor, Sigismund
Baumgarten (d. 1757).
Ugolini’s fame rests upon his Thesaurus antiquitatum sacrarum, in thirty-four enormous folios (Venice, 1744-69). This contains first a reprint of numerous treatises on Biblical archeology by various authors, and then a series of studies by Ugolini himself: Altare exterius, de mensa et panibus propositionis (x.); Altare interiws: De candelabro (xi.); De sacerdote castrensi [Deut. xx. 2 sqq.], (xii.); Sacerdotium Hebraicum (xiii.); De ritibus in cena Domini ex antiquitatibus paschalibus illustratis (xvii.); De phylactertis Hebreorum (xxi.); Triheresium [Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes] (xxii.); De re rustica veterum Hebreorum (xxix.); Uxor Hebrea (xxx.); and De veterum Hebreorum et reliquarum gentium, presertim Grecorum et Romanorum, funere et preficis (xxxiii.). All these treatises show a thorough knowledge of Jewish literature, as well as much other learning. A third portion of the Thesaurus consists of the text and Latin translation of ancient Jewish writings: thirty-one tractates of the Tosephthah (collection of pronouncements on matters of the law), twenty tractates of the Palestinian Talmud, three tractates of the Babylonian Talmud, four old Midrashim, and a number of tractates from the great Yad Hazakah of Maimonides. (H. L. STRACK.)