THE NEW SCHAFF-HERZOG
RLS
times. While he was not a notable scholar, he was a man of learning and earnest in his pursuit of knowledge. He had a talent for organization, the sense of practicality, and a ready eloquence. His diplomatic ability was such that, had his sphere been that of politics, he would have won eminence asa statesman. His piety was earnest, and he died in peace with his conscience. (S. D. van VEEN.)
BrsuiocrapuHy: Sources are: The autobiography, Johannis
Wtenbogaerts Leven, n.p., 1645, 3d ed., 1647; and his
Brieven en onuitgegeven Stukken, ed. H. C. Rogge, Utrecht,
1868-75. Consult: H. C. Rogge, Johannes Wtenbogaert
en zijn Tijd, 3 parts, Amsterdam, 1874-76; idem, in
Godgeleerde Bijdragen, vol. xxii.; idem, in Jaarboeken van
wetens. Theologie, new series, vol. i.; J. M. Schréckh,
Christliche Kirchengeschichte seit der Reformation, v. 226-
276, 35 parts, Leipsic, 1772-1803; J. L. Motley, John of
Barneveld, 2 vols., New York, 1874 (often reprinted); and
the literature under Arminius, JAKoBUS; EPiscoPpius,
Srmon; and REMONSTRANTS.
UZZIAH, vz-zai’a (AZARIAH): Ninth king of Judah, son and successor of Amaziah (q.v.). His dates, according to the old chronology, are 808-756; according to Kamphausen, 777-736; according to K. Marti (ZB, i. 797-798), 789-740. His name appears in various forms in the Hebrew: ‘Uzziyyahu (II Kings xv. 32, 34; II Chron. xxvi. 1 sqq., xxvii. 2; Isa. i. 1, vi. 1, vii. 1), ‘Uzziyyah (II Kings xv. 13, 30; Hos.i.1; Amosi.1; Zech. xiv. 5), ‘Azaryah (i Kings xiv. 21, xv. 1, 7, 17, 23, 27; I Chron. iii. 12), and ‘Azaryahu (II Kings xv. 6, 8); the meaning is ‘‘ Yahweh is my strength” or ‘‘ Yahweh hath helped.” There is no satisfactory explanation of the employment of the two names; the Septuagint does not follow strictly the forms in the Hebrew. Both names have parallels in form and meaning in Assyrian and Phenician.
The narrative in II Kings xiv. 21-22, xv. 1-7 makes Uzziah succeed to the throne at the age of sixteen, assigns to him a reign of fifty-two years, gives him a good character, even though the high places were not removed, states that he restored the possession of Hlath (on the eastern arm of the Red Sea) to Judah and so implies the reconquest of Edom, and that he became a leper, on account of which his son Jotham acted as regent. II Chron. XXvi. agrees with Kings so far as this narrative goes, but adds: (1) that Uzziah warred successfully against the Philistines, Arabians, and Meunim, and that the Ammonites became tributary; (2) that he strengthened the fortifications of Jerusalem; (3) developed a strong military establishment; (4) engaged extensively in pastoral, agricultural, and viticultural pursuits; and (5) that, puffed up with pride in his achievements, he became vain and entered the Temple to burn incense, (according to the Chronicler) an exclusively priestly prerogative, and that, in spite of priestly remonstrance, he persisted in his purpose and was stricken on the spot with
leprosy. While the Chronicler’s explanation of the cause of the leprosy may be regarded as a late midrashic legend, the details regarding Uzziah’s military measures receive incidental and weighty corroboration (cf. J. F. McCurdy, in The Expositor, Nov., 1891). The success of the Assyrians in their assaults on the Syrian powers would naturally result in such measures of defense as stronger fortifications and increase in murtitions and forces, and in the creation of such engines of war as are attributed to Uzziah. Moreover, the control of Philistine territory shown by Hezekiah only a few years later must have dated from this reign (cf. II Kings xviii. 13 sqq.). The Taylor cylinder of Sennacherib speaks of Arabians as forming part of the garrison of Jerusalem during Sennacherib’s attempts against the city, which is explained by Uzziah’s conquest over a part of the Arabian territory, going well with his command of the region south to Elath. The presperity of Judah which appears even during the weak reign of Ahaz must be traced to this reign; and the power of Judah at the beginning of the Sennecharib campaigns is explicable on these grounds. Uzziah’s force of character and foresight and wisdom doubtless prolonged the life of the southern kingdom, and his achievements thus make him one of the most important kings of Judah.
The passage in the annals of the great Tiglath- Pileser (most accessible in Eng. transl. in DB, iv. 844; see Assyria, VI., 3, § 9, ef. VI., 2, § 1) which refers to ‘‘ Azariah of Yaudi”’ is now by most scholars held not to refer to the subject of this sketch but to a king Azariah of a territory called Yaudi (the writing of which might easily be read as the Assyrian equivalent of ‘‘ Judah’’) not far from Alexandretta Bay in northwestern Syria. The places named in connection with the confederation against the Assyrians of which the document speaks are regarded as too remote from Judah to permit Azariah of Judah to take the leadership in such a confederation (cf., however, J. F. McCurdy, History, Prophecy, and the Monuments, i. 413-415, New York, 1894). A matter of some interest is the occurrence in Uzziah’s reign of an earthquake which was so severe as to serve as a sort of date of reckoning (Amos i. 1; Zech. xiv. 5).
Gro. W. GILMORE. BrsiiogRapHy: Besides the pertinent sections in the literature under Anas; and IsranL, Hisrory oF, consult: EB.
Schrader, Keilinsciisien und Geschichtsforschung, Giessen,
1878; H. Winckler, Alttestamentliche Forschungen, i. 1-
23, Leipsic, 1893; J. F. McCurdy, in Expositor, Nov., 1891,
pp. 388 sqq.; idem, History, Prophecy, and the Monu-
ments, i. 348-351, 413-415, New York, 1894; T. K. Cheyne,