A Brighter Day Begins with His Word.

A. A. Hodge, 1823–1886 • SECTION 166

399

← The Atonement

Calvinistic Universalists, their position shown to be illogical, 384.

Cameron, 346.

Candlish, 331, 390, 391.

Catechismus Romanus, 268.

Charenton, the Synod of, 85.

Christ the Substitute of his people, 71, 72, 151-153. Our sins were laid upon him, 157-165. He is the Surety, Head, and Advocate of his people, 191, 192. He secures for his people more than par- don, 207, 208. His righteousness in- eludes active as well as passive obedience, 230-245. His work as High Priest was one work—he intercedes for all those, and only those, for whom he died,379-381. The obedience of. See Obedience.

Chrysostom, 260.

Churches, the Greek, the Roman, the Lu- theran, the Reformed, 250, 253, 268.

Claude, Bishop of Turin, 248, 253, 262.

Clemens Romanus, 256.

Coleridge, S. T., 319.

Confession of the Greek Church, 268. The Second Helvetic, 270. The Gallic, 271, 346, 362. The Belgic, 271, 346, 362. The Westminster, 98, 272, 336, 346. Canons of the Synod of Dort, 346, 362, 363.

INDEX.

French Synod of Alez and Charenton, 346. Formula Consensus Helvetica, 97, 98, 273, 346, 365, 367. The Consensus Genevensis, 359.

Council of Trent, Decrees and Canons of, 268.

Covenant of Grace between the Father and the Son in eternity, 374-2376.

Cranmer, 267, 268.

Creationism, 97, 108, 109.

Cunnringham, D.D., William, 314, 232, 339, 360, 365.

Curcelleus, 225.

Cyril of Jerusalem, 260.

Daitlé, 361.

Davenant, Bishop, 345, 349.

Definition of technical terms in their established sense, 31—42.

De Moor, 367.

Design or intended Application of the At- onement, 321-395. As involved in the Arminian controversy, 322-324. As in- volvedin the controversy with Calvinistic Universalists, 324-327. The Orthodox doctrine of, stated, 328-336, 354. The question shown not to relate to the sufti- ciency of the Atonement, 328, 329; nor to its universal applicability, 329, 330 ; nor to its universal offer, 830, 331. The question, how the problem as to the Design of the Atonement is related to the problem as to its Nature, discussed, 337-342, 368-371. Doctrine of, as held by the Reformed Churches, 340; and as held by the Arminians, 341. History of the doctrine of, among Calvinists, 343-356. Augustine’s opinion of, 345. View of, held by the French Professors at Saumur, 346-351. View of, taught by the ‘‘ Mar- row men,” 351-355. View of, enter- tained by Calvin, 357-360. The doc- trine of, common to all the Reformed Churches, stated and historically estab- lished, 361-367. Doctrine of, explicitly taught by the Westminster Confession demonstrated, 363-365. The Orthodox doctrine of, proved to be true, 368-384. Objections to the Orthodox doctrine of, considered, 385-395.

Diognetus, Epistle to, 257.

Disinterested benevolence not the whole of virtue, 52, 313.

Divine Law absolutely immutable, 55-63. Its precepts intrinsically good, 55-57. Penalty an essential part of, 59. Penalty literally and strictly suffered by Christ, 61-63. Asa whole fulfilled by Christ, 63.

Doctrinal definitions necessary, 18-22.

INDEX.

Dorner, 254. Du Moulin, 336. Dwight, President, 83, 304.

Edwards, senr., President, 101, 102, 274.

Edwards, junr., Dr., 83, 304.

Election, the Calvinistic doctrine of, settles the question as to the Extent of the At- onenient, 38].

Emerson, 82.

Emmons, 83, 304, 355. Doctrine of Justi- fication of, 238.

Error always partial truth, 17.

Erskine, Ebenezer, 351.

Erskine, Ralph, 351.

Eusebius of Caesarea, 255, 259.

Expiation, term defined, 38.

Faber, G. S., 254.

Faith, the instrumental cause, not the ground, of justification, 210, 211, 216. “In” or “‘on” Christ the single condi- tion of salvation, 212, 213. Includes trust, 212. Effects of, 214. Scriptural doctrine of, shown not to be consistent with the Moral Theory of the Atone- ment, 215 ; nor with the Governmental view, 215, 216.

Federal relation to the law, 69-71. ship of Adam, 74-118.

Fiske, D.D., Daniel T., 57, 60, 310, 317.

Formula Concordiz, 272. Consensus Hel- vetica, 97, 98, 273, 346, 365, 307.

Head-

General reference of the Atonement as held by the ‘* Marrow men,” 351-355.

Gethsemane, 338.

God, his ultimate motives to action always self-derived, 46. Holiness an essential attribute of his nature as well as of his will, 48. His hatred of sin proved, 49. The different reasons assigned why he punishes sin discussed, 50. Propitia- tion of, 166-170. Immutability not in- consistent with the doctrine of Propitia- tion, 173.

Gomarus, 367.

Grace intrinsically optional, 54.

Gregory the Great, 261.

Grotius, Hugo, 224, 278, 303, 313, 314, 319. His idea of law, 55.

Guilt, technical meaning of term defined, 38.

Hegel, 82.

Heidegger, 365, 367.

Heidelberg Catechism, 270.

History of the doctrine of the Christian Church as to the Nature of the Atone-

399

ment, from the second to the eight- eenth century, 246-278. Of the Atone- ment controversy in the Secession Church, by Rev. Andrew Robertson, 353. Hogg, James, 351. Hopkins, Samuel, 83.

Public-domain historical work by A. A. Hodge, 1823–1886. OCR from an original historical scan hosted by Internet Archive; OCR may contain recognition errors.

Project Gutenberg source record →