Impetration, term defined, 38, 39. Of re- demption, how distinguished from ap- plication of the same, 39, 354. Of righteousness necessarily secures its ap- plication, 228, 229, 336, 370-373.
Impreventability of sin, the theory of, 80, 81.
Imputation of Adam’s sin, 84, 105. Im- mediate and antecedent, not mediate and consequent, 84-87. New England theory of, 83-89. Reformed doctrine of, stated, 105, 106. Of our sin to Christ, 161, 162. Of Christ’s righteousness to us, 210. Orthodox doctrine of, does not involve the absurd figment of the trans- fer of moral character, 289.
Incense offering, the symbolical design of, 144.
Innate corruption and guilt, 75-77.
Ireneus, 259.
Jenkyn on the Atonement, 325, 329, 334, 345,
John of Damascus, 262.
Jowett, 117, 120, 298, 314.
Justice not optional with God, 54. Es- sential attribute of the divine nature, 282-284.
Justification essentially forensic, 197-202. The doctrine of, the great principle of the Reformation, 202. Not equivalent to Sanctification, 201, 202. View of, held by the advocates of the Governmental Theory, 204, 205, 238. That it is not mere pardon, proved, 205-208. Founded on the righteousness of Christ imputed, 208-211. It is by means of, but not founded upon, faith, 210, 211. Calvin- istic view of, proved, 239-241. Arminian view of, 238.
Justin Martyr, 257.
Knox, John, 288.
Law. See Divine Law. Ceremonial and Moral, see distinction between, 57-59. The Natural, Federal, and Penal Rela- tions of, distinguished, 68-73, 232, 233. Can be satisfied only with a perfect righteousness, 209. Not relaxed by the introduction of the scheme of redemp- tion, 223-227. Christ owes no personal obedience to, 290, 291.
Limborch, 278.
26
INDEX, -
INDEX.
400
Litton on the nature of a type, and the dis- tinction between a type and a symbol, 133, 134.
Lollards, 297.
Luther, 249, 258, 267, 269. Misrepresenta- tions of his doctrine of Justification, ex- posed, 162, 163.
Lutherans, 297. Doctrines of, as to human inability, as to divine grace, and as to the indefinite design of the Atonement, shown to be mutually inconsistent, 339, 340.
Manicheism, 79, 80.
Marckius, 367.
Marrow of Modern Divinity, 351.
Maurice, Rev. Frederick, 115, 117, 120, 293, 294.
Maxey, 304.
Mediatorial office of Christ, nature of, de- fined by his character as High Priest, 151-158.
Meritum, meaning of term defined, 41.
Methodists, 297.
Miller, Hugh, 112.
Moravians, 297.
Motive of God in giving his Son to die, 28, 376, 377.
Miller, Julius 95-97.
Neander, 254.
Necessity of the Atonement founded on the essential attributes of the divine nature, 219-222 ; and proves the Orthodox doc- trine as to its nature to be true, 217-222.
Nevins, D.D., John, W., 89.
New England Theology, 83-89, 355.
New Englander, 51.
Nicene Fathers, 257-262.
Nicholas of Methone, 253, 264.
Obedience, active and passive, 41. Active and passive, how distinguished, 230, 245. Active inseparable from passive, 231, 232. Active and passive, do not con- stitute two distinct satisfactions to the law, but one perfect satisfaction, 244, 245. Perfect, demanded by the law, 209. Both active and passive, rendered by Christ in behalf of his people, 230-245. Christ did not owe any, for himself, 241, 290.
Objections to the Orthodox doctrine as to the Nature of the Atonement stated and answered, 279-291. To the Moral Theory of the Atonement, 296-303. Also those to the Governmental Theory stated, 306-320. To the Orthodox doc- trine of the Design of the Atonement considered, 385-3065.
INDEX
Objective and subjective, distinction pro- posed by Amyraldus, 333, 348.
Offer of the gospel to all men indiscrimi- - nately, what is involved in it, 385-390.
Olevianus, 270.
Order of the Divine Decrees, 347-351.
Origen, 89, 258.
Outram, 254.
Owen, John, 381.
‘
329, 336, 339, 358, 380,
Park, Professor. 355.
Parker, Theodore, 82.
Pelagius, 345.
Pelagians, 344.
Penal satisfaction of Christ a full equiva- lent for the penal obligations of his people, 225, 226.
Penalty defined, and difference between calamities, chastisements, and penal evils pointed out, 36, 37. The vain im- agination of “‘a substitute for a penalty,” 61. An essential part of law, 59. Was literally suffered by Christ, 61-63.
Perfection of the Atonement, 223-229.
Piscator, 244.
Placeus Joshua, 84, 85, 102.
Pena vicaria, what, 38.
Palycarp, 256.
Pre-existence, theory of, 89-92.
Priests, the effect of the work of, termi- nated on God, 141-143; and directly effected remission of sin, 144; and had definite respect to certain persons, 144, 145. é
Priesthood, essential nature of, proved,
141-144. Twofold function of, 148. Of Christ real, and not metaphorical, 145-148. Inferences as to the nature of
the Atonement drawn from that fact, 148, 149.
Priestley, Dr. 281.
Probation, a period of instable moral equi- librium, 69-71.
Propitiation, term defined, 38. Of God, 167-170.
Puritans, 297
Quich’s Synodicon, 350.
Ransom, 176, 177.
Rationalists, 77.