181-8 (rights and revenues of the tribe of Levi).
189-22 (law of the prophetX
18io» (Molech-worship ; cf. 12>1).
IglOb-ll (dillereut kinds of divi- nation and magicX
191 13 (asylum tor manslayer : murder).
1914 (the landmark).
1916-21 (law of witness).
ch. 20 (military service and war ;
cf. 24^). 211-9 (e.xpiation of an untrmced
murder). 2110-1* (treatment of female cap- tives).
2115-17 (primogenitureX
2118-21 (undutiful son).
2122.23 (body of malefactor).
221-* (animal straying or fallen ; lost property).
225 (sexes not to interchange gannents).
22«- ' (bird's nest).
22s (battlement).
2'29ii (against noD-natural mix- tures).
2212 (law of 'tassels').
2213-21 (slander against a newly- married maidenX
222227 (adultery).
222sf (sciuction).
231 (it^) (incest with step- mother).
23*9 (18) (conditions of admit- tance into the theocratic comnmnitv).
231018 (9 u) (cleanliness In the camp).
23I8 (15) (~ (humanity to escaped slave).
23I8 (17) r. (against religious pro- stitution).
2320 1191 (- (usurv).
232iS* |21 ill (vows).
2325 (Ui t. (regard for neighbour's crops).
241-' (divorce).
248 10-13 (pledges).
247 (inan-steaiingX
248'- (leprosy).
Lv 17H.« NuSS".
LvlQffl'.
„ 11*21 20».
„ 1716 11*0.
„ 273WB; No lg2i«.«
„ 251 '.*
253I»-46.» N'ul81"-*(Ct Ex
131f- ; Lv
2726;Nu3H
817). Lv 2S' ; Nu 28-
29.*
„ 191». „ 261.
2ai'-»t.
.. 7»"«*;
181-7. B.»>.-
„ isai 20".
„ 1926b. »1.
208-n. Nu 859«; L»
24170.
Hi
Lt 1»1».
cJ. Lv tO».
Lrl»19. NaUC-O.
Lr 18» tOl«.
„ 18»a)i .
NuW-f.*
Lv25»^ NuSW
LtU-I^
DEUTERONOMY
DEUTEROXOMY
601
JG.
DKnTEROMOHT.
P (Dicitnirao HX
2il4f- (wo^eA Of hired servant
Lv I9i«.
not to be detainwl).
24J* (the family of u criminal
not to 8UfTer witli liini).
Kx 2Z«>^»
2il7f. (Justice towartlH stranger.
.. !»»«■.
/n Mj js».
widow, und orptiau).
241 its; (ylcanini.'s).
„ IV- 2SZ>.
26i-J* (nuKlenitioii in infliction Of
the l>astinado).
tb* (tiiresliin^ ox not to b«
muzzled).
26*-*'-' (levirate marriageX 2611- 12 (modestv in womenX
mlUB (lust weiithU). 26" 19 r Amalelf).
„ l«»t.
17".
of. »«• n»»i
261 11 (thaniisgiving at the offer*
of. Nu 18>».
43l9.84a»..
ing of liret-fruita). 261»i»(tlianl!K|{iving at the pay- ment of tlie triennial tithe).
M»».
ch. 28 (peroration, presentini; motives for the observance of the Code).
LtS«M».
20<.as«n.
231».
of. 18* 1«. 20> IS"- '«. 18".
8411 IH.. 23Mb Sill.
18«22»«.
22»(«l)«a».
2318»84«»«.
I36f 23I» S41».
4IS-IB. 33 7» (a^inst images).
61*b (philanthropic object of Sahlmth).
6» 11'" (law of frontlet*).
014 iil« (a^inst ' other gods'X
6* (instruction to children).
7** l*(no oompoct with Canaan- Itee).
7» 12s (Canaanit« altars, 'pil- lars,' fto. to be destroyed).
1* 14i 21 2«i» 28» (Israel a • holy people '). (in difTerent connexionsX
1019 /to love the ' stranger').
121*0 1623 (blood not to b« eaten).
10^ (leavened bread not to be eaten with I'ajisover).
IQfbus (nnleaveiu-d cakes for seven days afterwards).
ld*b (flesh of F'assover not to remain till morning).
IflU. 16 (feast of ' booths,' 'seven davs ').
17« 19I5 ('two o» three wit- nesses ').
1»»1 (Ux talionis).
(hut in a difTerent applica- tion in each case).
27*- « (altars of unhewn stonesX
Lt 1S«> 201.
I. !»*•■
Nu 83».
„ 83W.
Lv ll«'. 19> 20'. »; Nu 16«.
19S4
II ivio-'i* 19311. fcf.SiTTMf; On I
i9»). Ex 128.
„ 12iB.I8-», Lt
2S«. „ 1210, No 9".
Lt 2SM. 39. 41-41.
NuSiM.
LT241W..
eo».
{The instances in which the divergence la moat marked are indicated by an asterisk *.]
vii. Date and Autiior.siiip. — The date to which tlie composition of Dt should he assigned cannot he determined witli any degree of cer- tainty. But it is clear, from what has hecn already said, that it cannot reosonahly he attri- huted to any very early period in the history of Heb. literature.
a. The testimony of the style and languaj^e connects it with the period jireccdiiit; the age in which the imitators of the Deut. style wrote and flourished. Certainly, the rich and mient oratori- cal periods of Dt belong to a period of ^i^)e literary development, and not to the rough beginnings of A national literature.
It has been asserted that this is contradicted by the presence of certain archaisms. But, even ii there were a few archaisms, their presence would not atl'cct the general impression produced by the character of the Deut. style. The alleged 'archa- iairs,' however, are not of a kind to furnish any proof of the antiquity of the book.
(a) Kin. The 'epicene' use of tlie j>ronoun throws more light u|>on tlie history of the text than u[)on the antiquity of the hook.
'I'lie vowels in «in and h'.t were in all probability absent from the original autographs.
The fern, form hi seems to have existed in the earliest periods of the language.
(6) Sxn for r\';iin. This form occurs 8 times in the Pent., 4 times in Dt 4^ 7-'' 9", once in 1 Ch 20" Sn. As the usual ' dissyllabic ' form occurs in the I'ent. some '260 times, and in the cognate dialects the dissyllabic form was usual, the monosj'llable is almost certainly an ortlio''r;iphical anomaly, and sliould have a second vowel, "tn, hxn ; cf. nx.
(c) loi (le'" 20"'), as in Ex 23" Si^] instead of "V!, which ia used over 50 times in the Pent. The use of T31 for iji goes back to the old law of Ex 23".
(rf) im.; (32<» 34'''), as elsewhere in Pent. In Jos it is spelt 'inn; 28 times, and we have 'im- in 2 S 10», Jer 39» 52". The suggestion has been oflered that ' Israel picked up a new pronunciation after they came to tiie place,' in other words, that until the death of Moses the Israelites called the place 'Yuvcclio' incorrectly, and that this was embodied in the Pent., but that the local uro- nuncialion was given by Joshua. It might have been siiiiposed that the writer of the account of the death of Moses (Dt 34'-*) would have had as good ojiportunities for ' picking up a new pro- nunciation ' as the writer of Jos 2'. But the pro- nunciation followed in the Pent, is found also in K, Ezr-Neh, and Ch ; so that no argiuuent can be based upon the variety of the spelling.