_Why hurriest thou to seek thy love?_ (Lit. _why dost thou make good thy way?_ somewhat as we say, "to make good way with a thing") (ver. 33). The key to the meaning here is supplied by ver. 36: _Why art thou in such haste to change thy way? In_ (Of) _Egypt also thou shalt be disappointed, as thou wert in Assyria._ The "way" is that which leads to Egypt; and the "love" is that apostasy from Iahvah which invariably accompanies an alliance with foreign peoples (ver. 18). If you go to Assyria, you "drink the waters of the Euphrates," _i.e._, you are exposed to all the malign influences of the heathen land. Elsewhere, also (iv. 30), Jeremiah speaks of the foreign peoples, whose connexion Israel so anxiously courted, as her "lovers"; and the metaphor is a common one in the prophets.
The words which follow are obscure. _Therefore the evil things also hast thou taught thy ways._ What "evil things"? Elsewhere the term denotes _misfortunes_, _calamities_ (Lam. iii. 38); and so probably here (cf. iii. 5). The sense seems to be: Thou hast done evil, and in so doing hast taught Evil to dog thy steps! The term _evil_ obviously suggests the two meanings of sin and the punishment of sin; as we say, "Be sure your _sin_ will find you out!" Ver. 34 explains what was the special sin that followed and clung to Israel: _Also, in thy skirts_--the borders of thy garments--_are they_ (the evil things) _found_, viz., _the life-blood of innocent helpless ones; not that thou didst find them house-breaking_, and so hadst excuse for slaying them (Exod. xxii. 2); _but for all these_ warnings or, because of all these apostasies and dallyings with the heathen, which they denounced (cf. iii. 7), _thou slewest them_. The murder of the prophets (ver. 30) was the unatoned guilt which clung to the skirts of Israel.
_And thou saidst, Certainly I am absolved! Surely His wrath is turned away from me! Behold I wilt reason with thee, because thou sayest, I sinned not!_ (ver. 35). This is what the people said when they murdered the prophets. They, and doubtless their false guides, regarded the national disasters as so much atonement for their sins. They believed that Iahvah's wrath had exhausted itself in the infliction of what they had already endured, and that they were now absolved from their offences. The prophets looked at the matter differently. To them, national disasters were warnings of worse to follow, unless the people would take them in that sense, and turn from their evil ways. The people preferred to think that their account with Iahvah had been balanced and settled by their misfortunes in war (ver. 30). Hence they slew those who never wearied of affirming the contrary, and threatening further woe, as false prophets (Deut. xviii. 20). The saying, "I sinned not!" refers to these cruel acts; they declared themselves guiltless in the matter of slaying the prophets, as if their blood was on their own heads. The only practical issue of the national troubles was that instead of reforming, they sought to enter into fresh alliances with the heathen, thus, from the point of view of the prophets, adding sin to sin. _Why art thou in such haste to change thy way?_ (_i.e._ thy course of action, thy foreign policy). _Through Egypt also shalt thou be shamed, as thou hast been shamed through Assyria. Out of this affair also_ (or, _from him_, as the country is perhaps personified as a lover of Judah;) _shalt thou go forth with thine hands upon thine head_ (in token of distress, 2 Sam. xiii. 19: Tamar); _for Iahvah hath rejected the objects of thy trust, so that thou canst not be successful regarding them_ (vv. 36, 37). The Egyptian alliance, like the former one with Assyria, was destined to bring nothing but shame and confusion to the Jewish people. The prophet urges past experience of similar undertakings, in the hope of deterring the politicians of the day from their foolish enterprise. But all that they had learnt from the failure and loss entailed by their intrigues with one foreign power was, that it was expedient to try another. So they made haste to "change their way," to alter the direction of their policy from Assyria to Egypt. King Hezekiah had renounced his vassalage to Assyria, in reliance, as it would seem, on the support of Taharka, king of Egypt and Ethiopia (2 Kings xviii. 7; cf. Isa. xxx. 1-5); and now again the nation was coquetting with the same power. As has been stated, an Egyptian force lay at this time on the confines of Judah, and the prophet may be referring to friendly advances of the Jewish princes towards its leaders.