3. the coming of luke. The introduction of the first person at this striking point in the narrative
Sec. 3. The Coming of Luke. 201
must be intentional. This is no general statement like XIV 22 (though even there the first person has a marked effect, p. 123). Every one recognises here a distinct assertion that the author was present. Now the para- graph as a whole is carefully studied, and the sudden change from third to first person is a telling element in the total effect : if there is any passage in Acts which can be pressed close, it is this. It is almost universally recognised that the use of the first person in the sequel is intentional, marking that the author remained in Philippi when Paul went on, and that he rejoined the Apostle some years later on his return to Philippi. We must add that the precise point at which the first-personal form of narrative begins is also intentional ; for, if Luke changes here at random from third to first person, it would be absurd to look for purpose in anything he says. The first person, when used in the narrative of XVI, XX, XXI, XXVII, XXVIII, marks the com- panionship of Luke and Paul ; and, when we carry out this principle of interpretation consistently and minutely, it will prove an instructive guide. This is the nearest approach to personal reference that Luke permits himself; and he makes it subservient to his historical purpose by using it as a criterion of personal witness.
Luke, therefore, entered into the drama of the Acts at Troas. Now it is clear that the coming of Paul to Troas was unforeseen and unforeseeable ; the whole point of the paragraph is that Paul was driven on against his own judgment and intention to that city. The meet- ing, therefore, was not, as has sometimes been main- tained, pre-arranged. Luke entered on the stage of this history at a point, where Paul found himself he knew
202 The Coming of Luke. Chap. IX.
not why. On the ordinary principles of interpreting literature, we must infer that this meeting, which is so skilfully and so pointedly represented as unforeseen, was between two strangers : Luke became known to Paul here for the first time. Let us, then, scrutinise more closely the circumstances. The narrative pointedly brings together the dream and the introduction of the first-personal element, " when he saw the vision, straight- way we sought to go " ; and collocation is everywhere one of the most telling points in Luke's style.
When we examine the dream, we observe that in it " a certain man of Macedonia " was seen by Paul. Paul did not infer his Macedonian origin from his words, but recognised him as a Macedonian by sight. Now, there was nothing distinctive in the appearance or dress of a Macedonian to mark him out from the rest of the world. On the contrary, the Macedonians rather made a point of their claim to be Greeks ; and undoubtedly they dressed in the customary Greek style of the JEgean cities. There was, therefore, only one way in which Paul could know the man by sight to be a Macedonian — the man in the dream was personally known to him ; and, in fact, the Greek implies that it was a certain definite person who appeared (avrjp -rt?, Latin quidam, very often followed by the person's name ; V I, VIII 9, IX 10, 33, 36, X i, etc.).
In the vision, then, a certain Macedonian, who was personally known to Paul, appeared, and called him over into Macedonia. Now, it has been generally recognised that Luke must have had some connection with Philippi ; and we shall find reason to think that he had personal knowledge of the city. Further, Paul, whose life had
Sec. 3. The Coming of Luke. 203
been spent in the eastern countries, and who had come so far west only a few days past, was not likely to be personally acquainted with natives of Macedonia. The idea then suggests itself at once, that Luke himself was the man seen in the vision ; and, when one reads the paragraph with that idea, it acquires new meaning and increased beauty. As always, Luke seeks no effect from artifices of style. He tells nothing but the bare facts in their simplest form ; and leaves the reader to catch the causal connection between them. But we can imagine how Paul came to Troas in doubt as to what should be done. As a harbour, it formed the link between Asia and Macedonia. Here he met the Macedonian Luke ; and with his view turned onwards he slept, and beheld in a vision his Macedonian acquaintance beckoning him onward to his own country.