23
354 •£*• P&ul in Rome. Chap. XV.
philosophers that Paul was likely to be listened to: they considered that they knew all he had to say, and could quote from their own lectures a good moral pre- cept to set alongside of anything he could tell them.
Yet there can be no doubt that some very striking parallels between Senecan and Pauline sayings occur ; and this is true of Seneca to a greater extent than of any other non-Christian writer. It is possible that the philosophical school of Tarsus had exercised more influence on Paul than is commonly allowed ; and it is certain that Seneca was influenced by Athenodorus of Tarsus. Lightfoot refers especially to the fact that both Paul and Seneca " compare life to a warfare, and describe the struggle after good as a contest with the flesh ". Seneca makes one long quotation from Atheno- dorus (de Clem.) 4), and in it the idea that life is a warfare is worked out elaborately ; and the saying (Ep. X), " So live with men, as if God saw you ; so speak with God, as if men heard you," occurs immedi- ately after a quotation from Athenodorus,1 and seems to be a reflection in Seneca's words of Athenodorus's intention. Athenodorus lived much in Rome, and died there in Cato's house, 60-50 B.C. ; but it is probable both that his system exercised great influence in the university of his own city, and that Paul's expression and language may contain traces of his university training in Tarsus.
But though there is no reason to think that Seneca was influenced by Paul's language or thoughts, yet there
1 " Know that you are set free from passions only when you have reached such a stage that you ask God for nothing which you cannot ask openly."
Sec. 3. Seneca and Paul. 355
is eveiy reason to think that the liberal policy of the Empire at this period in religion was due to Seneca's broad views. It is certain that he had exercised very- great influence on the Imperial policy, since his pupil Nero became Emperor in 54 ; and it is highly probable that the energy with which that policy was carried out in the East, and the generous freedom with which all religious questions were treated during that period, are due to Seneca's spirit. He is perhaps the only dis- tinguished politician of the first century who shows some of the wide views of Hadrian ; and it is remark- able that both Seneca and Hadrian were sprung from Spain, being thus thoroughly Roman and yet absolutely free from the old narrow Roman spirit It is clear that, in the later years of Nero's reign, the Empire began to fall into dangerous disorganisation, while in his early years the government at home and abroad seems to have been remarkably successful ; and it is not easy to account for the contrast, except by connecting the success with Seneca's guiding spirit. Now, the tone which marks the relations of the State to Paul throughout the period described in Acts, is quite different from that which began in A.D. 64 and subsequently became intensified. Surely we can best account for the change by the disgrace and retirement of Seneca in 62 : his spirit departed from the administration by rapid steps after that date. Circumstances had given him for a few years such influence as perhaps never again was exercised by a private citizen in the Empire. As a rule, the Emperors held the reins of government tight in their own hands, and allowed no subordinate to exert any influence on the general conduct of affairs ; and there are many great
356 •&• Paul in Rome. Chap. XV.
Emperors, but only one great Minister under the Empire, Seneca.
The household of Seneca during his ascendancy was likely to be brought into close relations with the great movements that were agitating the Empire. It is there- fore natural to expect that the new religion should affect it in some degree, as it did the Imperial household. Nor are we left to mere conjecture on this point. A remark- able inscription of somewhat later date has been found at Ostia, " M. Annaeus Paulus to M. Annaeus Paulus Petrus, his very dear son : " the name " Paul Peter " must be taken as an indubitable proof of religion. These persons possibly belong to a family of freedmen con- nected with the household of Seneca ; but, assuming that, it is no more admissible to quote this inscription as corro- borating Seneca's traditional subjection to Christianity, than it would be to quote the strong leaven of Christianity in Caesar's household in proof of Caesar's amenability to the same influence.