2 Ordained as a new thing to supersede the promise. — ED.
the promise, and at the same time severe. — svoj, of one) The middle term of the syllogism, of which the major and minor proposition is expressed, the conclusion is understood, One does not make use of that Mediator (that is, whosoever is one [one and the same unchanging being] does not transact first without a mediator, then the same one through a mediator ; nor does he afterwards withdraw himself [after having first dealt with His people immediately and directly], so as to transact through a mediator ; for familiar acquaintance does not generally decrease, but increase) : but God is one. Therefore God did not transact first without a mediator, then through a mediator. Therefore that party, to which the mediator belonged, is not one and the same with God, but different from God, namely the law.1 — 6 & ®sbg eTg earn, but God is one) There is not one God before and another after the giving of the law, but one and the same God. Before the law He transacted without a mediator ; therefore the mediator at Mount Sinai does not belong to God, but to the law ; whereas the promise belongs to God ; comp. on the unity of God, in reference to the same subject, Rom. iii. 30 ; also 1 Tim. ii. 5 : and the oneness of God before and after the law agrees most beautifully with the oneness of the seed before and after the law. Thus Paul infers from the very manner of giving the law, that the law was given on account of sin ; and thus the new objection in the following verse is in consonance.
21. OUK, then) This objection may be taken from the circum stance, that the law is said to have been given because of trans gressions. The answer is, that the law is not against the pro mises, and in regard to the answer two considerations are pre sented : The one is, the law in itself, though it were willing, cannot give the life that has been promised, ver. 21 ; the other is, nevertheless, as a schoolmaster, it assisted the promise of life ;
1 The syllogism is one of the first figure in Ferio. The major prop, is : One does not make use of that mediator. The minor is : But God is one ; and the conclusion is, therefore God does not use that mediator. But the conclusion drawn by Bengel is not directly from the major prop., but from the explanation of it within the parenthesis, and is perfectly sound according to his statement. The conclusion in the last sentence is not quite so clear. Let it be remembered, however, that there was a double media tion. God delegated the law to angels, who gave it to Moses : therefore Moses came between the law and the people.—TRANSL.