3—13-
379
7. ΚΑΙ προσκαλεῖται τοὺς δώδεκα, καὶ ἤρξατο αὐτοὺς ἀποστέλλειν "δύο δύο, καὶ ἐδίδου αὐτοῖς ἐξουσίαν τῶν πνευμάτων τῶν ἀκαθάρτων. b here only > a > ς 3 ε im “nay 8. καὶ παρήγγειλεν αὐτοῖς, ἵνα μηδὲν αἴρωσιν εἰς ὁδόν, εἰ μὴ ῥάβδον (Gen. vi
µόνον’ μὴ πήραν, μὴ ἄρτον,! μὴ eis τὴν ζώνην “χαλκόν: 9. GAN’ ἁὑποδεδεμένους ᾿ σανδάλια" καὶ “un ἐνδύσησθε” δύο Χιτῶνας.᾽ 10. Καὶ ἔλεγεν αὐτοῖς, ΄΄ Ὅπου ἐὰν εἰσέλθητε εἰς οἰκίαν, ἐκεῖ µένετε
ἕως ἂν ἐξέλθητε ἐκεῖθεν.
II. καὶ ὅσοι ὃ ἂν μὴ δέξωνται ξ spas,
1ο, 20). c Ch. xii. 41 > d Acts xii. 8. Eph. vi. 15. e Acts xii. 8 (Is. xx. 2. Judith x. 4; Xvi. ϱ)-
μηδὲ ἀκούσωσιν ὑμῶν, ἐκπορευόμενοι ἐκεῖθεν, ἐκτινάξατε τὸν * χοῦν { Rev. xviii.
τὸν ὑποκάτω τῶν ποδῶν ὑμῶν, eis μαρτύριον αὐτοῖς.
diy λέγω 19(=dust).
ὑμῖν, ἀνεκτότερον ἔσται Σοδόµοις ἢ Γομόρροις ἐν ἡμέρᾳ κρίσεως, ἢ
τῇ πόλει éxeivy.” 4
12. Kat ἐξελθόντες ἐκήρυσσον ὃ ἵνα µετανοή-
σωσιδ: 13. καὶ δαιμόνια πολλὰ ἐξέβαλλον, καὶ ἤλειφον ἐλαίῳ
πολλοὺς ἀρρώστους καὶ ἐθεράπευον.
1 µη αρτον µη πηραν in SBCLA. The order of Τ.Ε. conforms to Lk. (so in D). 2 (νδνσασθαι is the reading of W.H. (text), on slight authority. LE have
ενδεδυσθαι. “The Τ.Κ. is supported by $,ACDA, and is adopted by Tisch., Trg.
(text), Weiss (W.H. margin).
3 os av τοπος µη δεξηται in SBLA (Tisch., W.H.).
The T.R. is an adaptation
to ακουσωσιν in next clause, which refers to the people in the place. 4 From apny λεγω υμιν to εκεινη is an importation from Mt. not found in NBCDLA. 5 εκηρυξαν in S$BCDLA. The imperfect (T.R.) is an assimilation to εξεβαλλον in
ver. 13.
6 µετανοωσιν in BDL (Tisch., W.H.).
εκηρυξαν.
specifying an accompaniment of the mission, not pointing to separate em- powerment of each pair.—é£ovclay τ. π. τ. @., power over unclean spirits, alone mentioned by Mark, cf. Matthew and Luke.—Ver. 8. εἰ μὴ ῥάβδον µόνον: vide in Matthew, ad Ίοε.--χαλκόν: no mention of gold and silver, brass the only money the poor missionaries were likely to handle.—Ver. 9. ἄλλα... σανδάλια, but shod with sandals.— μηδὲ ὑποδήματα, says Matthew, recon- cilable either by distinguishing between sandals and shoes (vide on Matthew), or by understanding μηδὲ before ὑποδεδεμέ- νους (Victor Ant.).—8to χιτῶνας: In Mark the prohibition is not to wear (ἐνδύσησθε) two tunics, in Matthew and Luke not to possess a spare one. The sentence in vv. 8, 9 presents a curious instance of varying construction : first tva with the subjunctive after παρήγγειλεν (ver. 8), then ὑποδεδεμένους, implying an infinitive with accusative (πορεύεσθαι understood), then finally there is a transition from indirect to direct narra- tion in μὴ ἐνδύσησθε.---Ἱετ. το. ἐκεῖ, ἐκεῖθεν, there, in the house; thence,
µετανοησωσι (SSCA) sympathises with
from the village.—Ver, 11. καὶ ὃς ἂν τ. - . . ὑμῶν: another instance of incon- sequent construction beginning with a relative clause and passing into a con- ditional one = and whatever place does not receive you, if (ἐάν understood) they, its people, do not listen to you (so Schanz and Weiss in Μεγετ).---ὑποκάτω, the dust that is under your feet, instead of ἐκ and ἀπὸ in Matthew and Luke. The dust of theiy roads adhering to your feet, shake it off and leave it behind you. Vv. 12, 13 report the carrying out of the mission by the Twelve through preach- ing and healing.—tva μετανοῶσιν: the burden of their preaching was, Repent. Luke has the more evangelic term, εὐαγγελιζόμενοι,, The other aspect of their ministry is summed up in the expulsion of many demons, and the cure of many suffering from minor ailments, G&ppworous (cf. ver. 5). In Mark’s account the powers of the Twelve appear much more restricted than in Matthew (c/. x. 8). The use of oil in healing (ἐλαίῳ) is to be noted. Some have regarded this as a mark of late date (Baur). Others (Weiss, Schanz) view it as a primitive