ΕΟ, αι TO, ὁ καταβὰς αὐτός ἐστιν καὶ ὁ ἀναβὰς " ὑπεράνω πάντων ' τῶν τε,
Ὁ Acts ii. 2 οὐρανῶν, ἵνα Ἡ πληρώσῃ ” τὰ πάντα.
v.28; =
Rom, xv. 13. i Ch. i. 22 reff.
1QOmit, P 113 Thdrt., Euseb,
view not only ascended but also descen- ded. Hence what is in the writer’s mind here is held not to be the incarnation or humiliation of the pre-existent Christ, but the descent of the exalted Christ to His Church, supposed to be referred to also in such passages as ii, 17, ili. 17, ν. 31, 32. But it is nowhere taught in the Pauline Epistles that a descent or a de- parture from heaven after the exaltation was necessary in order that the ascended Lord might bestow gifts upon His Church. The passages cited do not bear out any such idea. The first (ii. 17) does not refer to a coming of the glorified Christ ; the second (iii. 17) speaks only of the spiritual presence of Christ in the heart; and the third (v. 31, 32) deals obviously with a ‘‘mystery” of relations, and has nothing to do with any coming of Christ out of heaven following on His ascen- sion or required for the bestowal of His gifts. Nor is there any reason why the καί should have more than the familiar additive force.—twepdvw πάντων τῶν οὐ- pavev: up above all the heavens. Soin Heb. vii. 27 our High Priest is described as ὑψηλότερος τῶν οὐρανῶν γενόμενος. There may be an allusion here to the Jewish ideas of a gradation of heavens, a series of three or, as the case rather appears to stand, seven heavens, with which the Pauline τρίτος οὐρανός (2 Cor. xii, 2) may also be connected; on the conceptions of a plurality of heavens which prevailed among the Jews, the Babylonians and other ancient peoples, see the writer's article on ‘‘ Heaven”’ in Hastings’ Dictionary of the Bible. But the point of the phrase as we have it here is simply this—that whatever heavens there are or may be, Christ is above them all. So high has His ascension carried Him. It means the highest possible exaltation—the supremacy of One who shares in the sovereignty of God. For the term ὑπεράνω see on i. 21.—tva πληρώσῃ τὰ πάντα: that He might fill all things. The use of the conj. with ἵνα after a past tense may be due to the fact that the ‘‘filling” is to be viewed as a continuous action (ΕΙΙ., Alf.; cf. Klotz, Devar., ii., p. 618), if it is not to be explained simply by the laxer employment of the conj. in NT Greek.
11. καὶ αὐτὸς ᾿ ἔδωκεν τοὺς
3 πληρ. εαντω 47.
The sense of fulfilling or completing has been given by many to the πληρώσῃ. Thus the idea has been taken by some to be that of the fulfilling of prophecy (Anselm, etc.), the accomplishment of all things that Christ had to do in His re- deeming mission (Riick.), the making of all perfect (Oltr.), etc. But, as in i, 23, the verb has the sense of filling, and τὰ πάντα is to be taken again in its widest application, and is not to be restricted to the world of believers or to the Church of Jew and Gentile (Grot., Schenk., εἰς,). Nor is there anything to suggest that the ubiquity of Christ's body is in view, as some Lutherans have argued (Hunn., Οαἶον., εἰς). The idea that is in the paragraph is not that of a ‘‘ diffused and ubiquitous corporeity,” as Ellicott well expresses it, but that of a “ pervading and energising omnipresence”, The thought is the larger one that the object of Christ’s ascension was that He might enter into regal relation with the whole world and in that position and roses bestow His gifts as He willed and as they were needed. He was exalted in order that He might take kingly sway, fill the uni- verse with His activity as its Soverei and Governor, and His Church with His presence as its Head, and provide His people with all needful grace and gifts. In OT prophecy to “fill heaven and earth” is the note of Deity (Jer. xxiii. 24).—We may be in a position now to determine Paul's object in introducing the passage from Ps, Ixviii. and in applying it as he does. The general connection is clear enough, He bids his readers study lowliness, forbearance and unity, because there is one faith, one baptism, etc. They are not to be vexed or divided because one may have more of the gift of grace than another. All receive from Christ, each in his own way and measure as Christ wills; for, as the Psalm shows, all gifts come from Him. Now some take the point of the quotation to be this—He who is the subject of the Psalm is One whose seat is in heaven, a Sovereign Giver of gifts (Ell.). Others are of opinion that the words are cited in order to bring out the fact that Christ’s bestowal of gifts “stands in ne connection with His general position of