The Pulpit Commentary — Mark — Volume 1 — Section 129

APPLI0ATION, 1. Christ's first call is to discipleship. We must first learn that we may teach ; obey and serve that we may guide and aid others. 2. vVe are summoned to conijecrate all our gifts and acquirements to the service and cause of Immanuel. 3. It is the highest honour end the purest happiness to be employed by Christ as bis agents. 4. It is necessary to be much with Christ in order that we ma.y be fitted efficiently to work for Christ. Vera. 20-30.-Blasphemy. Great men are often misunderstood by reason or their very greatness. Aims higher than those of others need other methods than such as are commonly employed by ordinary persons. How much more must this have been tha case with the Son of man I His mission was unique-was altogether his own. He could not fulfil his ministry and do the work of him who sent him, without stepping aside from the beaten tracks of conduct, and so courting criticism and obloquy. He could not well conciliate public opinion, for he came to condemn and to revolu- tionize it. For the most pa.rt he went his way, without noticing the misrepresenta- tions and the calumnies of men. Yet there were occasions, like the present, when be pa.used to answer and to confute his adversaries. I. THE BLASPHEMOUS CHARGE BROUGHT AGAINST JESUS. Ilis friends charged him with madness; his enemies attributed his works to the power of evil. In the allega- tion of the former there may have been some sincerity; those of the latter were ani- mated by ma.lice and hatred. Probably these scribes were sent down into Galilee from the authorities at Jerusalem, to check the enthusiasm which was spreading throughout the northern province with regard to the Prophet of Nazareth. The same charges were brought against him in Jerusalem; so that there may have been an under- standing as to the method to be adopted in opposing the great Teacher. The scribes discredited Jesus, first, by asserting that he was possessed by Beelzebub, the Syrian Satan; and secondly, by explaining his power to dispossess demons by the league between him and the lord of the demons, whose authority the inferior spirits coulu not but obey. There was no attempt to deny the fact that demoniacs were cured; this would have been so monstrously false that to take such a position would have been to ruin their own influence with the people. II. THE REFUTATION OF TIDB BLASPHEMY, 1. Our Lord's reply was on the ground of reason-of what might be called common sense, He used two parables, by which he showed the unreasonableness, the absurdity of the allegations in question. Suppose a house or a kingdom to be divided against itself, to be rent by internal discord and faction; what ?.s the result? It comes to ruin. And can it be believed that the crafty prince of darkness will tum his arms against his own servants and minions? So, Satan would " have an end." 2. Having refuted their argument, our Lord proceeded with his own; gave his explanation of what was the spiritual significance of his ministry, especially as regarded the "possessed." So far from being in league with Satan, the Lord Jesus was Satan's one mighty Foe; he had already, in the temptation, overcome him, and was binding him, and now, behold I he was spoiling the house of his vanquished enemy, in expelling the demons from the wretched demoniacs of Galilee I He could not have done this had he been in league with Satan, had he not already vanquished Satan. Having effected this, he "spoiled principalities and powers." Ill. THE CENSURE OF THIS BLASPHEMY, Our Lord first reasoned; then (as recorded from ver. 28) he spoke with authority, as One in the secrets of Heaven, with power to declare the principles of Divine judgment. There is, he declared, an eternal and unpardonable sin. H the scribes were not committing this, they were approaching it. The sin against the Holy Ghost, the confusion of truth with error, good with evil,-is a sin, not of ignorance, not of misunderstanding, but of wilfulness ; a sin of the whole nature; a sin against the light without and the light within. Our Saviour, in con- demning this sin, speaks as the rightful Lord, the authoritative Judge, of all mankind! APPLICATION. " What think ye of Christ?" To think of him with indifference is unreasonable, and shows the most blameable insensibility to the great moral conflict of the universe, on one side of which Jesus is the Champion. 'l'o think of him dis- paragingly is blasphemy; for "he that honourcth the Son hououreth the Father," and he that hoooureth not the Son honoureth not the Father. It is blasphemy to speak against the character or the authority of the Son of God. What remains, then? This~  !26 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MARK. [ou. m. 1-36.