The Pulpit Commentary — Matthew — Volume 1 — Section 324

Ver. 11.-Human and Divine fatherhoods. God can only be apprehended by man through some relations that are familiar to man. It may be assumed that the highest, best, most universal, of human relations will be found most fittingly to represent him. The one relation which is universal, and universally esteemed the highest, is the parental. It is passing strange that any difficulty should be found in securing the thankful acceptance of the doctrine of the Divine Fatherhood. Probably men a.re hindered by the desire to attain abstract conceptions of the Divine Being; certainly they a.re hindered by observing the patent fa.et of the imperfection of human fatherhoods. But it is the ideal Fatherhood, which hnman fatherhoods do but suggest, which alone can be applied to God. We not only have references to God as the Father characteriHtio of our Lord's teacbing-indeed, it is almost the only word he uses for God-but in this text we have his own comparison of the human and Divine fatherhoods, giving a precedent of which we may confidently take advantage. Probably theology would become altogether more human and more attractive if this comparison were more freely made. Man in the image of God is the best revelation of God. A.nd it should be easy to separate man as man from man the sinner. 1 THE HUMAN FATHEB 18 A PRAYER-HEARER. I. This he is by virtue of his relationship. A father has children; they are dependent on him. Dependence is the essence of prayer; it may be silent or it may be vocal. 2. This he is upon impulse of affection. His love~rnspires willingness to hear the needs of his children. Their good is a personal interest to him. 3. This he is by the persuasion of duty. All relations involve responsibilities; and a father is under obligation to meet the wants of his children, whether he knows them upon fatherly observation, or they make them known to him by cry and prayer. IL Tmc Drvnra FATHER IB A PRAYER-HE.&BEB, I. He also has been pleased to sustain relations as the Author of our being. And our dependence on our Creator is prayer to which he must respond. 2. He also has declared his personal love to us; and Jove must be heedful of the needs of its objects. 3. We may even think of God as being placed under honourable obligations by the relations into which he has brought us.-R. T. Ver. 12.-Primary moral duties not original. It is critically urged that our Lord'■ moral teachings were not original. We may gladly admit that they were not. How could they be? What a.re original moral teachings? Man was endowed from the beginning with the compkte circle of moral principles. If he had them not at the very first, he gained them all in the first experiences of human relationship; and the "Decalogue" did but state, in brief and formal sentences, the moral duties which man h~ always apprehended that he owed to man. Did any one arise now, and presume to teach us authoritatively new morals, we should know well what to say to him. "The new is not true, and the true is not new," It would have been the moralist'■ OD, VII. l-29.] THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO sr. MATTHEW. 319