hie saving grace. But at last the end bas come. The day of grace must be fol10wed by the day of judgment. 2. Even OhriBfB desire to save may be jrU1Jtrated. It is not enough to know that he yearnB to eave. Men may be lost now, as Jerusalem was lost. 3. Obstinate refection of Christ will lead to ruin. Man's will may thllll frlllltrate Christ's desire. Note: It wae not for stoning the prophets, l::ut for rejecting Christ's ealvation, that Jerusalem was ultimntely doomed. Christ can save from the worst sin; but none can be saved who wilfully reject him.-W. F. A. Vere. 2-33.-Phariseea and Sadd'l/,CeeB. The Pharisee11 first appear under this name in Jewish history about the year B.o. 160. There had been Separatists, or Puritans, as far back as the Captivity, but it was after the return to Palestine that events gave an impulse to the Separatist idea so strong as to consolidate what might otherwise have remained a tendency. The Jews had learned the value of commerce, and it was found impossible, in dealing with foreign merchants, to observe the minute regulations pre- scribed by the more zealous. The minority, who even pretended to this, were obliged to become Separatists, not only from the Gentiles, but from their own less scrupulous coreligionists. Hence their frequent connection with the scribee. There had always been scribes in Israel, men who could draw state or legal documents. But after the influence of Ezra had stimulated, if it had not created, a desire to know the Law, synagogues were to be found in every town. And a synagogue implied a copy of the Law and a person who could read it. The scribes therefore necessarily became a pro• fession, with just such a curriculum for pupils and candidates as distinguish professions among ourselves. It was inevitable that they should acquire great influence among the people. For in their best days they were the guardians of the Law, and strove unceasingly to make it supreme over every act of every person. Not only did the scribe discharge all the fuuctions or a modem lawyer, but he was appealed to in all circumstances where the application of the law might seem obscure. 'They were both the makers of the law and its administrators, and they did not scruple, sitting a.part from active life, to enforce on men engaged in it all the wire-drawn and fantastic dis- tinctions which their minds, imbecile with attention to the letter of the Law and with unpractical pedantry, could contrive. It was this inconsiderate exercise of their authority which provoked our Lord's rebuke. But burdensome as was the teaching of the scribes, two causes operated to make them the most popular members of the com• munity. 1. To them was committed the key of the kingdom of heaven; they had power to bind and loose-they alone could give a man assurance that he bad actnally attained to the righteousness required by the Law. 2. 'l'he people were at one with them in their grand aim to give the Law absolute sway over the life of every Jew. The Pharisees who did live as the scribes enjoined, were in the eyes of the people the true Israel, the pattern Jews. The scribes and Pharisees, then, though not id:mtical, were closely related, so closely that our Lord subjects them to one common rebuke. The Zealots, who repudiated any king but J ehova.b, and refused to pay tribute to Cresar, were the natural result or Pharisaic teaching. And indeed the Pharisees did them- selves refuse to swear allegiance to Herod. They may be looked on, therefore, as the national party. Their influence was not solely and throughout evil, for to them and to the scribes was due the knowledge of the Law to which our Lord so often appealed. But the grave defects of their teaching, and its ruinous influences on the religious chal'acter, are so distinctly enounced in the Gospels that they need not be dwelt on. The origin of the Sadducees expiains their position in the state. It is generally agreed that they take their name from Zadok, who was elevated to the high priesthood by Solomon. It was the same line which inherited the office after the Exile, and through all the changes in the Hebrew state the high priests maintained great influence, and in our Lord's time we find them still sitting as presidents in the highest court, the San- hedrin. Still, also, there were grouped round them the Sa.dducees I It was to this party that men of wealth, men in office, and men of pure priestly descent, attached themselves, although many of the priests leant more to the Pharisees. They lived in luxury, and their morality was not high. At the same time, whether from envy of the popularity of the Pharisees, or from common sense, they resisted the l:'harisaic additions to the Law. Thus they refused to accept the doctrine of the resurrection, not being able to find it i11 the Ilooks of Moses. They are rarely mentioned in thi '-16 THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MATTllEW. [on. xxm. l-39.
Gospels_, because they were mostly in Jerusalem, and their ideas had found no acoept- an~e with the people. From the_ leaven of Pharisaism, or ultra-legalism, three mis- chievous results follow. 1. The mmute regulations which are extended to the whole of life leave no room for conscience to exercise itself, and accordingly it pines and dies. 2. Minute observances obtain a magnified importance. 8. The bare performance of the duty enjoined is reckoned everythi11g, while the state of heart is overlooked. We shall escape the leaven of the Pharisee if we learn to pay more attention to the heart than to the conduct; if we have so true a delight in pleasing the Lord that we do not consider what men think of us. The leaven ef the Sadduaes is perhaps even more certainly fatal to true religion. The Pharisee has sincerity, though it is quite superficial• he has zeal, though misdirected; but the Sadducee has neither. He is all for this w~rld, and, save to forward him in it, religion is an encumbrance. His heart is not gladdened with any loving thoughts of God, nor his spirit refreshed by fellowship with the unseen world. If we escape these influences we shall do what few have done. For all men are under the temptation either to make too much of the observances of religion or to make them a mere form. Worldliness deadens a ma.u's spirit to spiritual impres- s.ions, aD:d grad_ually saps his faith till he ceases to believe in anything but the palpable world with which he has now to do. On the other hand, if the leaven of the Pharisee prevails to the extent of ma.king us fear God more than we love him, and do by oonstra.int what we ought to do because we delight in it, we are in as unwholesome a state as the Sadducee we reprobate.-D.