A Brighter Day Begins with His Word.

Hodge, Charles, 1797–1878 • SECTION 9

CHAPTER Vm. sm.

← Systematic Theology — Volume 2

§ 1. Nature of the Question ISO

§ 2. Philosophical Theories 182

Limitation of Being. — Leibnitz's Theory. — Antagonism. — Schleiermacher's Theory. — The Sensuoxis Theory. — Selfish- ness 144

Theological Theories.

§ 3. Doctrine of the Early Church 150

§ 4. Pelagian Theory 162

Arguments against it 155

§ 5. Augustine's Doctrine 157

Philosophical Element of his Doctrine. — Why he made Sin a Negation. — The Moral Element of his Doctrine . . . 169

§ 6. Doctrine of the Church of Rome 164

Diversity ol' Doctrine in the Latin Church. — Semi-Pelagians. — Anselm. — Abelard. — Thomas Aquinas. — The Scotists . .178

Tridentine Doctrine on Original Sin 174

The true Doctrine of the Church of Rome 177

% 7. Protestant Doctrine of Sin 180

Sin a specific Evil. — Has relation to Law. — That Law the Law of God. — Extent of the Law's Demands. — Sin not confined to Acts of the Will. — Consists in want of Conformity to the Law

of God. — Includes Guilt and Pollution 188

§ 8. Effects of Adam's Sin on his Posterity 192

§ 9. Immediate Imputation 192

Statement of the Doctrine. — Ground of the Imputation of Adam's Sin. — Adam the Federal Head of his Race. — The Representa- tive Principle in the Scriptures. — This Principle involved in other Doctrines. — Argument from Romans v. 12-21. — From

General Consent. — Objections 204

§ 10. Mediate Imputation 205

Origin of the Doctrine in the French Church . — Held by Theolo- gians in other Churches. — Objections. — Theory of Propagation 214

§ 11. Preexistence 214

§ 12, Realistic Theory 216

President Edwards' Theory. — Proper Realistic Theory. — Objec- tions 219

% 13. Original Sin 227

Its Nature. — Proof of the Doctrine. — From the Universality of Sin. — From the entire Sinfulness of Man. — From the incor- rigible Nature of Sin. — From its early Manifestations. — Eva- sions of the foregoing Arguments. — Declarations of Scripture. — Argument from the necessity of Redemption. — From the necessity of Regeneration. — From Infant Baptism. — From the Universality of Death. — From the common Consent of Christians 249 Objections. — Men responsible only for Voluntary Acts. — Inron-

▼1 CONl'ENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME.

Public-domain historical edition (1876). Text from OCR of an original Internet Archive scan; OCR may contain recognition errors.

Project Gutenberg source record →