c\^'
the Lutheran Church. This controversy was for a time authorita- tively settled by the " Form of Concord," which was adopted and enjoined as a standard of orthodoxy by the Lutherans. In this document both the doctrine of cooperation and that of absolute predestination were rejected. It taught the entire inability of the natural man for anything spiritually good ; and therefore denied that he could either prepare himself for regeneration or cooperate with the grace of God in that work. It refers the regeneration of the sinner exclusively to the supernatural agency of the Holy Spirit. It is the work of God, and in no sense or degree the work of man. But it teaches that the grace of God may be eifectually resisted, and that the reason why all who hear the gospel are not saved is that some do thus resist the influence which is brought to bear upon them, and others do not. While, therefore, regeneration is exclu- sively the work of the Spirit, the failure of salvation is to be referred to the voluntary resistance of offered grace. As this system was illogical and contrary to the clear declarations of Scripture, it did not long maintain its ground. Non-resistance to the grace of God, passively yielding to its power, is something good. It is something by which one class is favourably distinguished from another ; and therefore the reason why they, rather than others, are saved, is to be referred to themselves and not to God, who gives the same grace to all. The later Lutheran theologians, therefore, have abandoned the ground of the " Form of Concord," and teach that the objects of election are those whom God foresaw would believe and persevere in faith unto the end.
According to this scheme, God, (1.) From general benevolence or love to the fallen race of man, wills their salvation by a sincere purpose and intention. " Benevolentia Dei universalis," says Hol- laz, " non est inane votum, non sterilis velleitas, non otiosa compla- centia, qua quis rem, quae sibi placet, et quam in se amat, non cupit efficere aut consequi adeoque mediis ad hunc finem ducentibus non vult uti ; sed est voluntas efficax, qua Deus salutem hominum, arden- tissirae amatam, etiam efficere atque per media sufficientia et efficacia consequi serio intendit." ^ (2.) To give effect to this general pur- pose of benevolence and mercy towards men indiscriminately, God determined to send his Son to make a full satisfaction for their sins. (3.) To this follows (in the order of thought) the purpose to giv(j to all men the means of salvation and the power to avail themselves of the offered mercy. This is described as a " destinatio mediorum, quibus tum aeterna salus satisfactione Christi parta, turn vires crc- 1 Examen Theohgicum Acroamaticum, Leipzig, 1763, p. 599.
326 PART m. Ch. L— the PLAN OF SALVATION.
dendi omnibus hominibus ofFeruntur, ut satisfactionem Christi ad salutem acceptare et sibi applicare queant." ^ (4.) Besides this, voluntas generalis (as relating to all men) and antecedens, as going before any contemplated action of men, there is a voluntas specialise as relating to certain individual men, and consequens^ as following the foresight of their action. This volu7itas specialis is defined as that " quae peccatores oblata salutis media amplectentes aeterna salute donare constituit."^ So Hutter^ says, "Quia (Deus) praevidit ac praescivit maximam mundi partem mediis salutis locum minime relicturam ac proinde in Christum non credituram, ideo Deus de illis tantum salvandis fecit decretura, quos actu in Chris- tum credituros prasvidit." Hollaz expresses the same view : * " Electio hominum, peccato corruptorum, ad vitam aternam a Deo misericordissimo facta est intuitu fidei in Christum ad finem usque vitae perseverantis." Again : " Simpliciter quippe et categorice decrevit Deus hunc, ilium, istum hominem salvare, quia perseve- rantem ipsius in Christum fidem certo praevidit." ^
The Lutheran doctrine, therefore, answers the question. Why one man is saved and another not ? by saying, Because the one believes and the other does not. The question. Why God elects some and not others, and predestinates them to eternal life ? is answered by saying, Because He foresees that some will believe unto the end, and others will not. If asked. Why one believes and another not? the answer is. Not that one cooperates with the grace of God and the other does not ; but that some resist and reject the grace offered to all, and others do not. The difficulty arising from the Lutheran doctrine of the entire con-uption of our fallen nature, and the entire inability of the sinner to do anything spiritually good, is met by saying, that the sinner has power to use the means of grace, he can hear the word and receive the sacraments, and as these means of grace are imbued with a divine supernatural power, they produce a saving effect upon all who do not voluntarily and persistently resist their influence. Baptism, in the case of infants, is attended by the regeneration of the soul ; and therefore all who are baptized in infancy have a principle of grace implanted m them, which, if cherished, or, if not voluntarily quenched, secures their salvation. Predestination in the Luthei'an system is confined to the elect. God predestinates those whom He foresees will
1 Hollaz, Examen, iii.; cap. i. qu. 6; ed. Teller, Holmiae et Lipsioe, 1750, p. 589.
2 Ibid. III. i. 1, 3; p. 586.
8 Hutter, Lod Communes. Tract. Artie. Prcesdent. Prov. Deer., etc., vii.; Wittenberg 1619, p. 793, b. < Hollaz, Examen, ed. 1750, ut supra, p. 619. 5 Hollaz, Ibid. lu. i. 2, 12, prob. c. ; ut supra, p. 631.