512 A DISSERTATION ON DIVINE JUSTICE. [PART I.
the liberty of the divine will diminished in any respect more by the necessary egresses of divine justice than by the exercise of other attri- butes; for these necessary egresses are the consequence, not of an abso- lute but of a conditional necessity, ^namely, a rational creature and its sin being supposed, and both existing freely in respect of God, but the necessary suppositions being made, the exercise of other perfec- tions is also necessary; for it being supposed that God were disiDosed to speak with man, he must necessarily speak according to truth.
CHAPTEK III.
A series of arguments in support of vindicatory justice — First, from the Scriptures — Thi'ee divisions of the passages of Scripture— The first contains those which respect the purity and holiness of God — The second, those which re- spect God as the judge — What it is to judge with justice — The third, those which respect the divine supreme right.
A second argument is talien from the general consent of mankind — A threefold testi- mony of that consent — The first from the Scriptures — Some testimonies of the heathens — The second from the power of conscience — Testimonies concerning that power — The mark set upon Cain — The expression of the Emperor Adrian when at the point of death — The consternation of mankind at prodigies — The horror of the wicked, whom even fictions teri'ify — Two conclusions — The third testimony, from the confession of all nations — A vindication of the argument against Rutherford — The regard paid to sacrifices among tlie nations — Different kinds of the same — Propitiatory sacrifices — Some in- stances of them.
These preliminaries being thus laid down, to facilitate our entrance on the subject, I proceed to demonstrate, by a variety of arguments, both against enemies and against friends from whom I dissent, that ihis punitive justice is natural to God, and necessary as to its egresses respecting sin. But because, since the entrance of sin into the world, God hath either continued or increased the knowledge of himself, or accommodated it to our capacities by four ways, — namely, by the written word, by a rational conscience, by his works of providence, and, lastly, by the person of Jesus Christ, his only -begotten Son, and by the mystery of godliness manifested in him, — wc will sliow that by each of tliese modes of communication he hath revealed and made known to us this his justice.
I. Our first arginnent, then, is taken from the testimony of the sacred writings, which, in almost numberless places, ascribe this vindicatory justice to God.
The passages of holy Scripture which ascribe this justice to God may be classed under three divisions. The first contains those which certify that the purity and holiness of God hostilcly oppose and de- test sin. Whether holiness or purity be an attribute natural to God,
ARGUMENTS FOR VINDICATORY JUSTICE — SCRIPTURE. 513
and immutably residing in liim, has not yet been called in question by our adversaries. They have not yet arrived at such a pitch of madness. But this is that universal perfection of God, which, when he exercises [it] in punishing the transgressions of his creatures, is called vindicatory justice; for whatever there be in God perpetually inherent, whatever excellence there be essential to his nature, which occasions his displeasure with sin, and which necessarily occasions this displeasure, this is that justice of which we are speaking.
But here, first, occurs to us that celebrated passage of the prophet Habakkuk, chap. i. 18, " Thou art of purer eyes than to behold evil, and canst not look on iniquity." The prophet here ascribes to God the STcatest detestation, and such an immortal hatred of sin that he cannot look upon it, but, with a wrathful aversion of his countenance, abominates and dooms it to punishment. But perhaps God thus hates sin because he wills to do so, and by an act of his will entirely free, though the state of things might be changed without any in- jury to him or diminution of his essential glory. But the Holy Spirit gives us a reason very different from this, namely, — the purity of God's eyes : " Thou art of purer eyes than to behold evil." But there is no one who can doubt that the prophet here intended the holiness of God. The incomprehensible, infinite, and most perfect holiness or purity of God is the cause why he hates and detests all sin ; and that justice and holiness are the same, as to the common and general notion of them, we have shown before.
Of the same import is the admonition of Joshua in his address to the people of Israel, chap. xxiv. 19, " Ye cannot serve the Lord" (that is, he will not accept of a false and hypocritical worship from you) : " for he is an holy God ; he is a jealous God; he will not for- give your transgressions nor your sins." God, then, will not forgive transgressions, — that is, he will most certainly punish them, — because he is most holy. But this holiness is the universal perfection of God, which, when exercised in punishing the sins of the creatures, is called vindicatory justice ; that is, in relation to its exercise and effects, for in reality the holiness and justice of God are the same, neither of which, considered in itself and absolutely, differs from the divine nature, whence they are frequently used the one for the other.