(Gr.). The "Sibylline Oracles" (Gr.). The "Acts of Paul and Tiiecla" (Gr). The "Gospel of Thomas" the Israelite (Gr. and Lat.j.
IV. Literature. — The best accounts of these and other apocryphal documents will be found in Fabricii Codex Pseudipigraphus Y. T. (Hamb. and Lpz. 1713 and 1741), and Codex Apocryphus N. T. (Hamb. 1713-1722) ; Auctarium Cadicis Apocryphi N. T. Fabriciani, edidit And. Birch (Copenh. 1804) ; A new and full Method of settling the Canon of the N. T., by the Rev. Jeremiah Jones (Oxf. 1720— last edition, Oxf. 1827); Du Pin, Prolegomena (Amst. 1701); and Canon of the Old and New Testaments (London, 17( <n ; Volkmar, Eimle.it. in die Apocryphen (vol. i, Tub. 18G0-G3) ; and especially Ccdcx Apocryphus N. T. etc., edit, with notes, prole- gomena and translation, hy T. C. Thilo (torn, i, Lips. 1832, 8vo ; the remaining two volumes have not been published) — containing : (1.) The histoiy of Joseph the Carpenter, Arab, and Lat. ; (2.) The Gospel of the Infancy ; (3.) The Protevangelion of James, and the Gospel of Thomas the Israelite, Greek and Latin; (4.) The Gospel of the Nativity of Mary and the History of the Nativity of Mary and the Saviour, Latin ; (5.) The Gospel of Marcion, collected by Dr. Hahn from ancient Greek MSS. ; (6.) The Gospel of Nicodemus, Gr. and Lat.; (7.) Apprehension and Death of Pilate, Gr. ; (8.) The mutilated and altered Gospel of St. John, preserved in the archives of the
j Templars of St. John of Jerusalem in Paris, with Gries- bach's text; (9.) An apocryphal book of the Apostle
I John, Lat. Consult the following by Dr. Teschendorf : (1.) De Evangeliorum Apocryphorum origine et usu (Hague, 1851) ; (2.) A eta Apocrypha ex ant. codd. (Lips. 1852); (3.) Evungelia Apocrypha adhib. codd. Grcec. et Latinis (Lips. 1853) ; (4.) Apocalypses Apocrypha (Lips. 1866). Dr. Laurence, of Oxford, has published the following apocryphal works : (1.) The Book of Enoch (1838); (2.) Ascensio Isaice Vatis (1810) ; (3.) Primi Es-
| rce Lihri (1820). Comp. Lardner, Works, x, 31. See
! Acts, Gospels, Epistles, Revelations (spufious). The best commentary on the apocryphal books of
| the O. T. (i. e. those contained in the Sept. and Vulg.
I but not in the Heb.) is the Extgetisehes Handbuch zu den Apohryphm des A. T. by Fritzsche and Grimm
, (Leipz. 1856 sq.); a convenient one for English read-
; ers is Rich. Arnald's Crit. Comment, on the Apocrypha (Lond. 1744, and often since). Annotations on each book are also contained in Calmet's Commentary, and the Critiei Sacri, vol. iii; see likewise Parei Opera, i; De Sacy's Sainte Bible • Cappel, Commentarii, p. 560, Others are by Van Hamelsveld (Amst. 1797) ; Heze,
APOLLIN ARIANS
296
APOLLINARIS
(Lemgo, 1800) ; Wilson (Edinb. 1801) ; Gaab (Tub. 1818-19); Plessner (Berlin, 1834); Gutmann (Alton. 1841); Bosberg (Stutt. 1840). Different editions : Fa- bricius (Frkft. and Lpz. 1691) ; Leusden (Frcft. ad M. 1G94); Keineccius (Lips. 1732, 1757) ; Bendsten (Gott. 1790) ; Augusti (Lips. 1804) ; Apel (Lips. 1836). All the ancient versions of the texts extant may be found in the 4th vol. of Walton's Polyglot*. Davidson has given a brief but critical Introduction to each book in Home's Introd. new ed. vol. ii. Of a more miscella- neous character : Suicer, Thesaur. Eccl. p. 438 ; Giese- ler, Was heisst Apolcrypkisch ? in the Theol. Stud, ii, 141 ; Das Kriterium e. apokr. Bucks, in Augusti's Theol. Bl. i, 540; Raynolds, Censura apocryph irum V. el N. T. (Oppenh. 1611); Hencke, Prodromos ad apocr. V. T. (Hal. 1711); Benzel, De apocr. N. T. in his Syntag. i, 316 sq. ; Eichhorn, Einltit. in d. Apokr. des A. T. (Lpz. 1795); Frisch, D. Apokr. d. A. T. u. d. Schr. d. N. T., in Eichhom's Bibl. iv, 653; Bendsten, Exerc. in V. T. Apocr. (Gott. 1789) ; Bretsehneider, D. Apokr. d. A. T. (Lpz. 1805) ; Cramer, Moral d. Ap. d.A.T. (Lpz. 1815); Jenichen, De librorum X. T. it V. T. apocr. Ulustratione (V7iteb. 1786) ; Kuinol, Obs. ad N. T. ex apocr. V. T. (Lips. 179-i); Beckhaus, D. Apokr. d. A. T. (Dortm. 1808) ; Friinkel, Apocrypha a Grcec. in Heb. conversa (Lips. 1830) ; Appendices ad apocr. N. T., in J. Holler's Theol. Bibl. ix, 1 sq. ; Brockmann, De apocr. nomine (Grvph. 1766); Augusti, D. Apokr. d. A. T. (Bresl. 1816); Moulnie, Les litres apoci-yphes de V An- cient Test. (Genf. 1828); Bergguist, Messia in apocr. V. T. (Lond. 1826) ; Ebrard, Zeugnisse gegen d. Apokry- phen (Basle, 1851); Kierl, D. Ajwkryphen des A. T. (Lpz. 1852) ; Kluge, id. (Frcft. ad M. 1852) ; Stier's Es- says in the Evang. Kirchenz. 1828, 1853, 1855 ; Nitzsch, in the Zeitschr.f. christl. Wissensch. 1850 ; Bleek, Sttl- lung d. Ap. d.A.T. (in the Stud. u. Krit. 1853, p. 267 sq.). See each of the apocryphal books under its name. The following works are on the apocryphal addi- tions to the New Test. : Schmid, Corpus apocr. extra £iM/(Hadam.l804); Beausobre, De N. T. apocryphis (Berol. 1734) ; Kleuker, D. Apokr. d. N. T. (Hamb. 1798) ; Lorsbach, D. heiUgen Bilcher d. Johannisjiinger (Marb. 1807) ; Bartholma, Uebers. d. Apokr. d. N. T. (Dinkelsbuhl, 1832); Beausobre, in Cramer's Beitr. i, 251-314; Reuss, Di Ar. T. apocr. (Argent. 1829); Suckow's ed. of the Protevmgelium Jacobi (Vratisl. 1841); Ellicott, Cambridge Essays for 1856; Toland, Collection of Pieces, i, 350. Many of these spurious works are translated in Hone's Apocryphal N. T. (Lond. 1820 ; N. Y. 1849, 8vo), and Abp. Wake's Apost. Fathers (Lond. 1830; Hartf. 1834, 8vo).