488
ἐμοὶ παραδέδοται, καὶ ᾧ
εα
av θέλω δίδωμι αὐτήν: 7. σὺ οὖν ἐὰν
προσκυνήσῃς ἐνώπιόν µου, ἔσται σου πάντα." 1
8. Καὶ ἀποκριθεὶς
αὐτῷ εἶπεν ὁ ᾿Ιησοῦς, ““Yraye ὀπίσω µου, Σατανᾶ 2 γέγραπται ydp,? ὁΠροσκυνήσεις Κύριον τὸν Θεόν σου," καὶ αὐτῷ µόνω λατρεύσεις.᾽ ” 9. Καὶ ἤγαγεν ὃ αὐτὸν eis Ἱερουσαλήμ, καὶ ἔστησεν αὐτὸν ἐπὶ τὸ πτερύγιον τοῦ ἱεροῦ, καὶ εἶπεν αὐτῷ, “Ei 6° υἱὸς εἶ τοῦ Θεοῦ, βάλε σεαυτὸν ἐντεῦθεν κάτω: 10. γέγραπται γάρ, ΄ Ὅτι τοῖς ἀγγέλοις αὐτοῦ ἐντελεῖται περὶ gov, τοῦ διαφυλάξαι σε" 11. καὶ ὅτι ἐπὶ
Χειρῶν ἀροῦσί σε, µήποτε προσκόψῃς πρὸς λίθον τὸν πόδα σου.
32
A 3 A 12. Καὶ ἀποκριθεὶς εἶπεν αὐτῷ 6 ᾿Ιησοῦς, “΄ Ὅτι εἴρηται, ΄Οὐκ
ἐκπειράσεις Κύριον τὸν Θεόν σου.
13. Καὶ συντελέσας πάντα
πειρασμὸν 6 διάβολος ἀπέστη am’ αὐτοῦ ἄχρι καιροῦ.
ς
14. ΚΑΙ ὑπέστρεψεν 6
᾿Ιησοῦς ἐν τῇ δυνάµει τοῦ Πνεύματος εἰς
τὴν Γαλιλαίαν: καὶ φήμη ἐξῆλθε καθ ὅλης τῆς περιχώρου περὶ
αὐτοῦ.
1 πασα in SABDLAE.
15. καὶ αὐτὸς ἐδίδασκεν ἐν ταῖς συναγωγαῖς αὐτῶν, δοξαζό-
Άνπαγε . . . Lat. omitted in NBDLE 1, 33 al. (from ΜΕ.).
3 yap omitted by the same authorities.
4 S9BDL al. have Kup. τον θ. σ. προσκ. (W.H.). 5 ηγαγεν δε in BLE, which also omit αυτον after εστησεν.
6 Omit o NABDLAE.
From the Jewish point of view, it is true, Satan might quite well say this (J. Weiss-Meyer).—Ver. 7. σὺ, emphatic; Satan hopes that Jesus has been dazzled by the splendid prospect and promise: Thou—all Thine (€o-rat cot πᾶσα).- Ver. 8. ὕπαγε Zaravaisno part of the true text, imported from Mt.; suitable there, not here, as another temptation follows. Vv. 9-13. Third temptation. Mt.’s second.—‘lepovoahyp, instead of Mt.’s ἁγίαν πόλιν.--ἐντεῦθεν, added by Lk., helping to bring out the situation, suggesting the plunge down from the giddy height—Vv. το and 11 give Satan’s quotation much as in Mt., with τοῦ διαφυλάξαι σε added from the Psalm.—Ver. 12 gives Christ’s reply exactly as in Mt. The nature of this reply probably explains the inversion of the order of the second and third tempta- tions in Lk. The evangelist judged it fitting that this should be the last word, construing it as an interdict against tempting ¥esus the Lord. Lk.’s version of the temptation is characterised throughout by careful restriction of the devil’s power (vide vv. 1 and 6). The inversion of the last two temptations is due to the same cause. The old idea of
Schleiermacher that the way to Jerusalem lay over the mountains is paltry. It is to be noted that Mt.’s connecting particles (τότε, πάλιν) imply sequence more than Lk.’s (καὶ, δὲ). On the general import of the temptation vide on Mt.—Ver. 13. πάντα π., every kind of temptation.— ἄχρι καιροῦ: implying that the same sort of temptations recurred in the ex- perience of Jesus.
Vv. 14-15. Return to Galilee (cf. Mk. i. 14, 28, 39).—Ver. 14. ὑπέστρεψεν, as in ver. 1, frequently used by Lk.—év rq δυνάµει τ. Π., in the power of the Spirit; still as full of the Spirit as at the baptism. Spiritual power not weakened by temptation, rather strengthened : post victoriam corroboratus, Bengel.—dypy (here and in Mt. ix. 26), report, caused by the exercise of the Svvapts, implying a ministry of which no details are here given (so Schanz, Godet, J. Weiss, etc.). Meyer thinks of the fame of the Man who had been baptised with remarkable accompaniments; Hahn of the altered transfigured appearance of Jesus.—Ver. 15. ἐδίδασκεν: summary reference to Christ’s preaching ministry in the Galilean ΥΠΑΡΟΡΙΕΣ.- αὐτῶν refers to Γαλιλαίαν, ver. 14, and means the
-7—18.
(µενος ὑπὸ πάντων.