32. καὶ ἐξεπλήσσοντο ἐπὶ τῇ
33. Καὶ ἐν τῇ
υναγωγῆ ἣν ἄνθρωπος ἔχων πνεῦμα δαιµονίου ἀκαθάρτου, καὶ συναγωγῇ ἦν ἄνθρωπος zx pa δαιµονίου ρτου,
ἀνέκραξε φωνῇ µεγάλη. 34. λέγων.ὶ “"Ea, τί ἡμῖν καὶ col, Ιησοῦ
Ναζαρηνέ; Θεοῦ.” καὶ ἔξελθε ἐξ 2 αὐτοῦ.”
Ch. ν. 9. Acts iii. το.
ἦλθες ἀπολέσαι ἡμᾶς; 35. Καὶ ἐπετίμησεν αὐτῷ ὁ
ἐξῆλθεν ἀπ᾿ αὐτοῦ, μηδὲν βλάψαν αὐτόν.
οἶδά σε τίς El, 6 "Ingots, λέγων, “ Φιμώθητι,
ἅγιος τοῦ
ς
Καὶ ῥίψαν αὐτὸν τὸ δαιµόνιον εἰς τὸ µέσον
36. καὶ ἐγένετο ’ θάμβος
ἐπὶ πάντας, καὶ συνελάλουν πρὸς ἀλλήλους, λέγοντες, “ Tis ὁ λόγος
οὗτος, ὅτι ἐν ἐξουσίᾳ καὶ δυνάµει ἐπιτάσσει τοῖς ἀκαθάρτοις πνεύµασι,
καὶ ἐξέρχονται ; τόπον τῆς περιχώρου.
37. Καὶ ἐξεπορεύετο ἦχος περὶ αὐτοῦ εἰς πάντα
38. ᾽Αναστὰς δὲ ἐκδ τῆς συναγωγῆς, εἰσῆλθεν εἰς τὴν οἰκίαν
Σίμωνος: ἡ " πενθερὰ δὲ τοῦ Σίμωνος ἦν συνεχοµένη πυρετῷ µεγάλῳ:
Sit BS , 2 8 ‘ 7a και ἠρώτησαν aUTOY περι αὐτῆς.
39. καὶ ἐπιστὰς ἐπάνω αὐτής,
ἐπετίμησε τῷ πυρετῷ, καὶ ἀφῆκεν αὐτήν ' παραχρῆμα δὲ ἀναστᾶσα
διηκόνει αὐτοῖς.
40. Δύνοντος δὲ τοῦ ἡλίου, πάντες ὅσοι εἶχον ἀσθενοῦντας νόσοις
1 Omit λεγων NBLE cop. Orig. 3 aro in NBCDLE 33 al.
as it is the first mention in Lk.’s own narrative. Yet the description is vague, as if by one far off, for readers in the same position. No mention here of the lake (vide v. 1).—Ver. 32. ἐν ἐξουσίᾳ: no reference to the scribes by way of contrast, as in Mk., whereby the charac- terisation loses much of its point.—Ver. 33. Φωνῇῃ µεγάλῃ, added by Lk: in Lk.’s narratives of cures two tendencies appear—(1) to magnify the power dis- played, and (2) to emphasise the benevo- lence. Neither of these is conspicuous in this narrative, though this phrase and ῥίψαν, and μηδὲν βλάψαν αὐτόν in ver. 35, look in the direction of (1).—Ver. 34. ἔα: here only (not genuine in Mk., Τ.Ε.) in N. T. =ha! Vulg., sine as if from é¢v; a cry of horror.—Naflapnvé: Lk. usually writes Ναζωραῖε. The use of this form here suggests that he has Mk.’s account lying before him.—Ver. 35. μηδὲν before βλάψαν implies expectation of a contrary result.—Ver. 36. 6 λόγος οὗτος refers either to the commanding word of Jesus, followed by such astounding results («quid est hoc verbum?” Vulg.), or = what is this thing ? what a surprising affair! (‘quid hoc rei est?”’ Beza, and after him Grotius, De Wette, etc.). In either case Lk.’s version at this point is
2 am in &BDLE minusc. 4 Omit y NABDLE.
altogether secondary and colourless as compared with Mk.’s, g.v.—Ver. 37. ἦχος (ἀκοὴ, Mk.), a sound, report; again in xxi. 25, Acts li. 2 = ἠχώ in classics.
Vv. 38, 39. Peter’s mother-in-law (Mt. viii. 14, 15, Mk. i. 29-31).—Ztpevos : another anticipation. In Mk. the call of Peter and others to discipleship has been previously narrated. One wonders that Lk. does not follow his example in view of-his preface, where the apostles are called eye-witnesses, ἀπ᾿ ἀρχῆς.-- ἦν συνεχοµένη, etc.: Lk’.s desire to magnify the power comes clearly out here. ‘* The analytic imperfect implies that the fever was chronic, and the verb that it was severe,’ Farrar (C. G. T.). Then he calls it a great fever: whether using a technical term (fevers classed by physicians as great and small), as many think, or otherwise, as some incline to believe (Hahn, Godet, etc.), in either case taking pains to exclude the idea of a minor feverish attack.—Ver. 39. παραχρῆμα, immediately, another word having the same aim: cured at once, and perfectly ; able to serve.
Vv. 40, 41. Sabbath evening cures (Mt. viii. 16, 17, Mk. i. 32-34).—8vvovros τ. %.: Lk. selects the more important part of Mk.’s dual definition of time.
32—44-
ποικίλαις ἤγαγον αὐτοὺς πρὸς αὐτόν - ἐθερά 9 μη ἐθεράπευσεν αὐτούς.
χεῖρας ἐπιθεὶς 1
δαιμόνια ἀπὸ πολλῶν, κράζοντα καὶ λέγοντα, ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ Θεοῦ. Καὶ ἐπιτιμῶν οὐκ εἴα αὐτὰ λαλεῖν,