Ομαρτεε VI.
VI. τ---δ. ΕΥΑΓΓΕΛΙΟΝ
VI. τ. ἘΓΕΝΕΤΟ δὲ ἐν σαββάτῳ δευτεροπρώτω } διαπορεύεσθαν αὐτὸν διὰ τῶν ” σπορίµων' καὶ ἔτιλλον of μαθηταὶ αὐτοῦ τοὺς στάχυας, καὶ ἤσθιονὸ Ψώχοντες ταῖς χερσί. 2. τινὲς δὲ τῶν Φαρισαίων εἶπον αὐτοῖς, “Ti ποιεῖτε ὃ οὐκ ἔξεστι ποιεῖν ἐν τοῖς σάββασι; 3. Καὶ ἀποκριθεὶς πρὸς αὐτοὺς εἶπεν ὁ ᾿Ιησοῦς, “ O58e τοῦτο ἀνέγνωτε, ὃ ἐποίησε Δαβίδ, ὁπότε ὃ ἐπείνασεν αὐτὸς καὶ ot pet αὐτοῦ ὄντεςτ; 4. ὣς ὃ εἰσῆλθεν eis τὸν οἶκον τοῦ Θεοῦ, καὶ τοὺς ἄρτους τῆς προθέσεως ἔλαβε, καὶ ἔφαγε, καὶ ἔδωκε καὶ τοῖς μετ᾽ αὐτοῦ, οὓς οὐκ ἔξεστι φαγεῖν εἰ μὴ µόνους τοὺς ἱερεῖς; 5. Καὶ ἔλεγεν αὐτοῖς, '' Ὅτι 10 κύριός ἐστιν ὁ vids τοῦ ἀνθρώπου καὶ
σοι
τοῦ σαββάτου.” Ἡ
1 S9BL 33 al. omit δευτεροπρωτω. Vide below.
2 S8BL al. omit των (from parall.).
3 και ησθιον τους σταχυας in BCL (W.H.; Tisch.=T.R. with 9).
4 Omit αυτοις BCL minusc. a, c, e, cop.
5 B omits ποιειν, and S$BL omit ev (W-H. omit both).
6 ore in S$BCDL minusc. (W.H.; Tisch. has οποτε with less weighty witnesses,
vide below).
7 Omit οντες with BDL 33 al. (W.H.). 8 B omits ws (W.H. in brackets), D also, reading εισελθων. 9 For ελαβε και BCLX 33 have λαβων, and BL omit και after εδωκα,
10 $B 1, 131 aeth. omit οτι (W.H.),.
1 του σαβ., without και, before ο υ. τ. av. in $B cop. aeth. (W.H.).
(Tisch.).
Mt.’s οὐκ = not even; have ye so little understood the spirit of the O. T.? (De Wette). The word might be analysed into ov, δὲ, when it will mean: but have ye not then read this? So Hofmann, Nésgen, Hahn.—émére, here only in N. T., if even here, for many good MSS. have ὅτε (W.H.).—Ver. 4. Lk. contents himself with the essential fact: hunger, overruling a positive law con- cerning the shewbread. No reference to the high priest, as in Mk., and no additional instance of the Sabbath law superseded by higher interests, as in Mt. (xii. 5). The controversy no longer lives for him, and his accounts are apt to be colourless and secondary.—Ver. 5. καὶ ἔλεγεν : in Lk. this important logion about the Son of Man’s Lordship over the Sabbath is simply an external annex to what goes before = and He said: instead of arising out of and crowning the argument, as in Mt., and partly in Mk., though the latter uses the same phrase in introducing the logion peculiar to him about the Sabbath being made forman. If Lk. had Mk. before him,