with a Latin versi in his Cura Philological (Hamb.
17:;.'). Iio). vol. v ad fin.; these were reprinted in the Bibliotheca Palrum ofGalland (Venice, 177:>, fol.), vol. xiii. A further portion of eighteen Quastiones, under the title 'Etc t&v Qumov 'AfiipiKo^iwv riva, Ex Photii Amphilochiis quoedam, was published, with a Latin ver- sion, bj Angelus Antonius Schottus | Naples, l >• 1 7 . lto); and Bome further portions, one of twenty Quastiones, with a Latin version by .Mai. in his Scriptorum Vete- riini Nova Collectio, i. 193, etc., and another of a hun- dred and thirty Quaestiones, in i\. 1. etc. As many of the Quastiones were mere extracts from the Epistola and other published works of Photius, Mai considers that with these and with the portions published by him, ih< whole ofthe Amphilochia has now been pub- lished. He thinks (Scriptor. Vet. Nova Collect, vol. i,
Proleg. p. xl I that tin- patriarch, towards the (dose of his
life, < piled the work from his own letters, homilies.
commentaries, etc., and addressed it to his friend Am-
philochiuS, as a mark of repel, and not becaU8e the
questions which were solved had actually been proposed
to him by that prelate; and he thus accounts tor the
identity of man\ passages with those in the author's
other works.
8. Adversus Manichwos s. Paulicianos Libri Quatuor. No Greek title of the whole work occurs, hut the lour
books arc respectively thus described : 1. A<//y/j<r<c iripi rrjc yiavi\aiii)v avafSKaoTtimioQ, Narraiio de Manir chmis recins npullulantibus. 2. 'Airopiat Kai XvotlC, t&v Miifiytifif. I'nl, i, t ,/ Solutiones Afanichoiorum. .'!. Toii 'Vfiriui' \6yoQ r. Photii Sermo III. I. Kan) rrjc 7(7))' Mavixaimv aprubvovc, irXavrjc, ipoeviif toi ayuitTartp uovaxv irptapurkpip Kai f/yovpivip Tuii repair, Contra repullulantem Manichaorum Errorem ad Arsenium Monachum Sanciissimum Presbyterum el Prce- fectum Sacrorum, The title of the set I hook is con- sidered by Wolff to apply to the second, third, and fourth books, which formed the argumentative part ofthe work, and to which the first hook formed a historical introduction. The second book is intended to show that the same God who created spiritual intelligences
also created the holies with which they are united, ami the material world generally; the third vindicates the divine origin of the (Hd Testament ; ami the fourth reiterates some points of the second ami third hooks, and answers the objections ofthe Paulicians. The first hook has several points in common with the historical work of PetrUS Siculus on the same subject, so as to make it probable that one writer u-ed the Work ofthe
other, and it is most likely Photius availed himself of that of Petrus. This important work of Photius was designed lor publication by several scholars (see Wolff, I'm fat. In Anecdot. time. vol. i; and Fabricius, Bibl. Graze, vii. :('-".»: xi. 18), but thej were prevented by death from fulfilling their purpose. Montfaucon pub- lished the first book, with a Latin version, in hi- Bib- liotheca Coisliniana (p. 349, etc.) ; ami the whole work was given by Jo. Christoph. Wolff, with a Latin version ami notes, in his Anecdota drum (Hamb. 1722, 12mo), vols. i. ii. from which it was reprinted in vol. xiii of the Bibliotheca Patrvm ofGalland (Venice, 177'.'. fol.). A sort of epitome of this work of Photius i- found in the Panoplia of Euthymius Zigabenus. Oudin contended that the work of Metrophanes of Smyrna, on the Ma- iiichaans and on the Holy Spirit, was identical with this work of Photius; but this opinion is erroneous.
!». Kara tS>v rijc jraXaiac 'Pwujjc on Ik Xlarplc p,6vov hKirophifrai to Ylvevpa to ilyiov dXX' o«x' Kul ik tov riot/, Adversus Latinos de Procession* Spiritus Sancti. This work is incorporated in the Greek text of the Panoplia of Euthymius Zigabenus | f/ergovist 1710. fol., p. 112, 113), of which it constitutes the thirteenth rirkog or section. It is omitted in the Latin versions of Euthymius. The work of Photius contains several syllogistic propositions, which are quoted and answered seriatim in the Dt I noun Eoclesiarum Gratia T, of Jo- annes Veccus, published in the Grmcia Orthodoxa of Allatius (Koine. 1652, lioi.i. 154, etc. It is apparently the work entitled by Cave Disputatio Compen Procession* Spiritus Sancti a solo Patre.
10. '<>/!i\«n. Homilice. Several of these have been published: i I.) "EKfypamc, rrjc iv role (iaoiXtioic. via£ liacXnaiac, rrjc, virepayiac Qbotokov inro BaoiXelov row MaKeduvoQ olKodopnStione., Descriptio Nova Sanctissi- i,i,i Dei Genitrids Ecclesia,in Palatio a Basilio Mace- dont exstructa : a discourse delivered on the day of the dedication of the church described. It was first printed by Lambecius, in his now- to the work of Georgius Codinus, l<< Originibus CPolUams (Paris, 1655, fol.), p. 187, and is contaiued, with a Latin version, in the Bonn reprint of Codinus ( 1839. 8vo). It is also contained in the Originum CPolitanarum Manipulus of Combefis (Pari-. 1664, Lto), p. 296, with a Latin version and notes; and in the Tmpenum Oriental* of Bandurius (Paris, 1711. fol.), pats iii. p. 117. (2.) Ei'c re yevioiov rij£ VTrtpayiac, Oeotvkov, Homilia in Sanctissima !><i Ge- nitrids Natalem Diem, published by Combefis in his Auctarium Vi (Paris, 1648, fol"), vol. i. col. 1583,
and in a Latin version, in his Bibliotheca Patrum con- cionatoria (Paris, 1662, fol. etc.). Both text and ver- sion are reprinted in the Bibliotheca Patrum ofGalland. (3.) //' SepuUuram Domini; a fragment, probably from this, is given by Mai (Scriptor. Vet. Nova Collect. Pro-