THE NEW SCHAFF-HERZOG
Cologne, 1646; London, 1648; Rome, 1657; and by William Romaine, London, 1747-49, in 4 vols. (15 leaves), 1,366, 1,234, 1,326, 852, 184 cols. (43 leaves), folio. John Buxtorf's concordance was published by his son: Concordantiw bibliorum Hebraicw, nova et artificiosa methodo disposita in locis innumeris depravatis emendatm. Accesserunt novcB concord. Chaldaicce per Johannem
Buxtorf fil., Basel, 1632 (10 leaves), and sheets A- Yj-j-yy. The preface tells of the earlier concordances. Buxtorf left the particles out (cf. Glauch, De tisu concord antiar urn biblicarum schediasma, Leipsic, 1668, p. 24). In Le Long, Bibliotheca sacra, Paris, 1723. there is found under Christopher Crinesius: "Cone. Hebr., Wittenberg, 1627, quarto." Jocher has |n3f TSD sen analysis Novi Ti. per 27 tabular. (Is that the same book?) Andreas Sennert published at Wittenberg, 1653, 12 leaves to announce a book that he would like to publish if some one would bear the cost: ItOpH DlpO riNID, sive manuals concordantiarum Ebrmo-Biblicarum cl. J. Buxtorjii. Christian Raue abbreviated Buxtorf: Cone. Hebr. et Chald. I. Buxtorfii epitome, Berlin and Frankfort, 1677. Christian Nolde gave the particles: Concor. particularum Ebr.-Chald., Co^ieiihsLgen, 1679; Sim. Bened. Tympe added to it Joh. Michaelis's and Christian Koerber's particles: Nolde, Cone, parlic. S. Gottfr. Tympiits summa cura recen-
su it inseruit concordantias pronominum sepa-
ratorum Ebr. et Chald. nunc primum congestas a Simeone Benedicto Tympio denique appendicis loco siibjutj.rit lexica particularum Ebraicarum Joh. Michaelis [cum prcefatione Aug. Pfeifferi ; cf. Bindseil, XXXV., note 1] et Christiani Koerberi, Jena, 1734. Le Long names William Robertson, Thesaurus ling, sanct. seu cone, lexicon Ebr.-Lat.-bibl., London, 1680, and Antony Laymann, Concordantias HebrwosacrcB iuxta seriem cuiusque constructionis syntacticce, n.p., 1681. (Is that really a concordance?) John Taylor made a very good Hebrew concordance adapted to the English text, 1764, 2 vols. Isaac ben Tsebi from Soldin in Prussia summarized Buxtorf: nTiJ "I'NO -iDDH nwp Nini v^" K'ltf
N'VJNTllpOlp Nnpjn, Frankfort-on-t he-Oder, 1768. Julius Ftirst's great work: E'TpHJIK'S IVIN, Leipsic, 1 840, is stiU much used ; editions by B. Baer, Stettin, 1847 and 1861. G. V. Wigram aided by S. P. Tregelles and B. Davidson published the Englishman's Hebrew and Chaldee Concordance, London, 1843, 3d ed., 1866; Davidson, revised by Joseph Hughes, London, 1876. Strack refers to concordances of proper names by Gid. Brecher, Frankfort-on- Main, 1S76, and by L. M. Schusslowitz, "ISD mD"*n niVN, AMlna, 1878.
In the year 1884 Solomon Mandelkern announced a new concordance: Die neubearbeitete Hebraischchalddische Bibel-Concordanz . nebst Gutachten von Fachgf'lehrten, and published 15 pp. quarto; later an approving word of H. L. Fleischer's was added on a separate leaf. Finally the book appeared: Solomon M andcU:ern Veteris Testamenti roncorduntiac Hehraic(r et ChtildfiiecE (and a
Hebrew title), 2 vols., Leipsic, lS(»(i, xv., 1,532 pp. folio. Later Mandelkern made a small edition without the wording of the pasK,'\jj;('s, Leipsic, n.d., viii. (1), 1,010 (1) pp. quarto. This work had been
long preparing and was published at Leipsic where there are good compositors and good proof-readers in every branch; it should therefore have been careful and accurate, but it is not at all well done. Consequently it is desirable that scholars in this department should collect their contributions to the correction of the errors and send in the
lists of mistakes found, so that the 2. Mandel- publishers can issue a supplement, kern's Con- which they are willing to do. The best cordance. way would be to divide the book up
between a large number of men, so that nothing could escape detection. Some of the contributions are already made: Carl Siegfried, Stellenfehler in Mandelkern' s V T cone. Hebr., in ZWT, 1897, 465-467; Rudolf Kittel, Ein kurzes Wort uber die beiden Mandelkernschen Concordanzen, in ZATW, 1898, 165-167; B. Jakob, Georg Beer, Gustaf Dalman, Bernhard Stade, ZATW,
1898, 348-351; Herman L. Strack, TLZ, 1898, no. 13, 358-359; (Mandelkern, Pro domo, ZATW,
1899, 183-186); A. Biichler, B. Jakob, K. Ludwig, E. Konig, A. von Gall, ZATW, 1899, 187-191, 350; (I. I. Kahan, ZATW, 1899, 353-356; Mandelkern, ZATW, 1900, 173-176; Kahan, ZATW,
1900, 338-344); E. Rosenwasser, ZATW, 1902, 320; A. Zillessen, ZATW, 1903, 94-95; Von Gall, ib. 95-96; Mayer Lambert, ib. 352-354; Von Gall and E. Nestle, ib. 354; Rosenwasser, ZATW, 1904, 146, 326; M. Brann, in Monatsschrift fUr Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums, 1898, 529-537; Badt, in Monatsschrift fiir Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums, 1899, 523, 524; J. Gottsberger, Biblische Zeitschrift, ii., 1904, 259; Sven Hemer, in ZDMG, Ixi (1907), 7-17. Doubtless other scholars have further corrections. Professor Kautzsch in Halle has given the following:
p. 34 D3iDin "Si read Hos. 2, 3, instead of 2, 2. p. 251 read \-iStJni instead of TiStjnn. p. 315 read but Job 6, 21, DP'^n.
p. 371 l^in Ct 3, 4 should be put by itself as stat. constr. p. 479 Why has Mandelk. I Chr. 3, 5, itSu ? Ed. Mant., Baer, Ginsb. have here also itSu. p. 488 ^ain Prov. 30, 6 is wanting.
p. 503 at least I Ki. 18, 3 does not belong under the perfect but under the adj. verbale, and probably also I Ki. 1, 51; 18, 12; Prov. 14, 16; Job. 1, 9.
p. 729 instead of njin ed. Mant., Baer njin.
p. 733 read P.l ( = t:p instead of i:i and t')-
p. 771 nNU'O (infin. absl. Niph.7)II Sam. 19, 43 is wanting.
p. 1005 iXMGen. 32, 8, instead of 32, 7.
He expressed the wish that some one would make a concordance of the words arranged according to the end of the words, so that a scholar could work rapidly with fragments of the inscriptions and of manuscripts; cf. Friedrich Zimmer's Greek termination-concordance.
III. Greek Concordances: Sixtus Senensis relates that about 1300 a Basilian monk, Euthalius of Rhodes, made a Greek concordance of the whole Bible, following Hugo of St. Cher's example in the Latin Bible. This is said to have been seen in manuscript at Rome, but is unknown. Another Greek, George Sugdures, who studied at Rome toward the end of the seventeenth century and afterward taught at Constantinople, is said to have worked thirty years on a Greek concordance of the